TBayXXXVII

Yup. In other words... 'We need to pretend to help black people, but what we're really doing is giving black men the excuse to not pay for their kids. Then, when the mothers and kids don't have enough money, we'll tell the woke idiots in our state that it's because the state needs to raise their welfare payouts. They'll buy it because they don't want to be called racist. After that, we'll increase minimum wage so that they can afford the tax increase. The net result is, "there's always a victim we can pander to and capitalize off of, so that we can stay in our big mansions taking money from the citizens and corporations". In reality though, this is only to pander to black men. They saw that in 2016, the biggest switch from left to right, nationally, was black men. If the left starts to lose black men, it's only a matter of time until they lose the vast majority and then the women will follow. It's just another pander scheme, just like reparations, to keep black people voting blue. They're never going to actually do anything.

The poor one's? He wants your tax dollars to pay them reparations so that they can be millionaire's for 10 years, then broke again. That way he can claim that white republican's are the reason to push racism that they democrats can stay in power.

If the schools want diversity, why the outrage?

The part I find the funniest about the Democrats on Affirmative Action is blatant admission of racism by their side and the people don't see it. The DNC is pushing the narrative to that Affirmative Action is necessary and that only racists would be opposed to it. Yet, the education system... especially at the college/university level, are the most leftist group in the country... further left than the DNC. The politicians are telling people that the colleges would be racist if Affirmative Action doesn't exist. LOL, the Democrat party is literally telling you that a Democrat organization is racist, and their constituency ignores that. That is too funny. If Democrats are supposedly the most educated people in the country, how come they're the dumbest?

You're misinterpreting my posts. I do agree with you... I even responded to your first post (that our resident lefties ignored). I'm simply saying I'm not going to buy the b.s. that they're going to spin and gave reason's why. I'm not arguing with you.

Or Mark Furman.

Nah, just not falling for the leftist shill crap. Odds are that the "investigation" will tell us that it's a nothingburger. Common sense should tell you that they're covering up the truth. Do you think that the most secure building in the entire world, has no video footage who left the coke there?

Again, there's still camera's. Again, every day, the Secret Service sweeps EVERY area outside people go. They know exactly where and when the cocaine was left and found. It doesn't take long to view the footage. Go take a tour of the White House. They are quick to tell you that everything is recorded by video. You can clearly see a ton (but by all means, not all), of the camera's. As I said in an earlier post, you can't fart in the White House without the S.S. knowing... they're certainly not going to miss a "white powdery substance"... nor with the dogs. If it was a random person, be it a tourist, a maid, a gardener, what have you, that would've come out by now. If that's the case, there's no downside to coming out on Tuesday, when it was reported, and say this is what we found, it's a small amount and we relieved that employee of their job. Story over. Them not saying it until 8 days after it's found is proof enough of a cover-up.

You really think that those cubbies aren't checked after every single tourist group goes through there? Seriously? You don't think that the Secret Service lets people just store stuff in there, willy nilly, without checking it? I'm not down a rabbit hole, you're head is so buried in the azz of Team Blue that you're desensitized to seeing sh!t.

Yeah, you are probably correct on this more than I am. But, I think they're not wrong. It's clearly a cover-up if the W.H. say's they don't who it was or if they pass it off as a tourist. Too much time has gone by for the "tourist" angle.

Those locations are on camera too. You do NOTHING on W.H. property that isn't on camera. If it was found in the cubby, all they have to do is check the footage of that area for the people who put stuff in there. There's literally on a few hours they have to review (maybe less). After every tour group goes through, those area's are swept by Secret Service. If that's when they found it, they know exactly who it was because they only need to check the footage of those people entering for that group. Also, if that were the case, they'd have mentioned it already. They found it Sunday. It was reported on Tuesday. When it was reported, the story from the W.H. should have been something like "We found a white powdery substance in the tourist area where people put their belongings before entering the White House. It was a small amount that isn't prosecutable, so we're not going to use any resources to track the person down". End of story.

Translation: I'm a Democrat shill who'll believe whatever my masters tell me to believe and stay true to Blue. This guy thinks there's "a lot of footage to go through".

I don't need the Secret Service or the White House to tell me anything. Common Sense already won. No, the location is irrelevant. As I said, it's the most secure building in the entire world. There's camera's everywhere. They knew Sunday night who's it was and tried to keep it quite because it was someone important. It got out, now they're trying to find out how to either say "we don't know where it came from", without sounding incompetent or full of crap or to tell us that they found the person (a low level staffer/"tourist"), and wanted to protect their right to privacy/justice. Either way, it's all bull crap because they should've come out with it on Monday morning.

Maybe. I thought the NBA was already crap before that and the fact that they were built to be dominate, and didn't dominate, made those years inconsequential. They had one 60-win season and lost 2 of the 4 championships they made (should've lost 3, but the Spurs crapped the bed that first matchup).

I don't care about the reports saying where it was found... that's irrelevant. The more wide-open (and/or public accessible), the location, the more video surveillance there is, hence, the person who left it there is known. If it's a more secure area, then it further proves that it was someone important to the DNC. How much did they find? Not even enough to warrant trafficking/dealing charges. Most likely single person (or couple people), use amount. Something that would get you a slap on the wrist. With that being the case, there's only ONE reason to not tell us who it was. It would look bad for the party. Plain and simple. It was found on Sunday and first reported on Tuesday. They had 48 hours to "find" the person responsible without this being an issue. It's now Friday and we don't know who it was. At this point, it's clear that it's a high profile person important to the DNC.

Which should prove what I said is true, don't you think? If it isn't true, they'd tell who it was, so it goes away.

It's been going downhill since Jordan left, the second time. Kobe staved it off... a bit, but not much. The NBA thrived on pushing players, not teams. After Jordan, they needed a new face, and they didn't have one. The pushed Kobe who was close, which is why he helped slow the downhill turn, but he wasn't good enough.

They all lie, even when there's video evidence, they show you want they want you to see. The truth always sits somewhere in the middle. In this case, common sense should tell everyone that the person who left it there is important to the DNC (or their circle), and the W.H. is holding it back. They have video footage and they reviewed it. The person who left it there was either a Democrat politician, a high power Democrat donor, or that donor's family member that was in the W.H. Saturday night/Sunday morning. If it were a W.H. staff member or politician staff member, they'd have been fired already because then the story is over.

I already said that in my prior posts without knowing she ever said that. It's common sense. I don't need anyone to tell me that. I've been to the White House, I've taken the tour. There's camera's EVERYWHERE. Like I said in my very first post, they know exactly who left it there. They knew the day they found it.

If it's the simplest "explanation", as you put it, it would've come out already because they'd have checked the security video's. The fact that they didn't say it already is proof enough that they're purposefully not saying it. Also, they don't run tours on Sunday's, when it was found. Are you trying to tell me that the cocaine was in the library for 24 hours and NO ONE found it? You expect me to believe that the most secure building in the entire world, had NO ONE walk through the building after the tours were over on Saturday to secure the area's where people toured? Do you actually believe that? It's not a conspiracy theory, it's common sense. Have you ever been to the White House? I have. You can't FART in that building without security knowing about it. They're NOT going to miss a "powdery substance" for 12 to 24 hours. GTFOH with that bull crap.

Well, the media never tries to hide it, do they?

I don't trust her either. Anyone involved in DC automatically has 0 credibility in the trustworthy department, as far as I'm concerned. Like I said above, I'm 99.99% confident they know exactly, who left it there because there's 100% video coverage of the entire building at all times. The ONLY way they don't know who it is, is if someone with authority to have the camera's disabled, gave an order to do so. What they're doing is delaying as long as possible to say anything as to either... 1) Hope the story goes away (because it will), like everything else. 2) A bigger story comes along (again, because it will), like every other time. 3) Find a patsy to take a payoff. Here's what I do know... the person is a very high profile person in regards to the Democrat party. No, that's not speculation, it's a fact. It's a fact, because we all know that they know who the person is, and they still haven't told us 5 days after the fact.

I couldn't care less what Trump says, even though the media or W.H., in my opinion has no credibility where I'd believe them if they said Hunter wasn't there, but common sense and logic tells you that... 1) It's someone very important to the administration (because they were allowed to be in the library of the executive mansion, unsupervised). 2) It's been 96 hours since they found it and haven't said who it was... and we know, they know who it was (i.e., there's camera's EVERYWHERE in that building). I don't think they'll ever say who it was unless that person gets paid off. Willing to bet it's a Biden/Harris staffer who gets fired and we never hear from again... but that person will be sitting at home with an 8-figure bank account and a signed NDA.

I have no idea who it was. What I am about 99.99% certain of, they know exactly who it was, and they're covering up. I'm also 99.99% confident that there's a video surveillance of it and it's being kept quite because of who the guilty party is. I'm not saying it was any Biden family member or Harris, but I'm pretty confident it is someone that the White House doesn't want the public to know. If it was a random staffer, they'd have said it and fired that person by now as they're an easy scapegoat. It's definitely someone important.

That's apparently what @Hawkeye21 is eluding to.