TBayXXXVII

The only poll that matters is the one that they hold in November.

This is funny, because it's a side step to needing an ID to vote (which is apparently racist), and this is apparently championed by liberals. Like @Voltaire said above, this really isn't an issue unless they're planning to use their DL rolls to mail everyone out ballots. Also, like what @Baker Boy said, it's not a problem either unless another plan they're envisioning is giving illegal immigrants DL's.

It is a shame that throughout time, we've always had Democrat policies that kept people down.

I think they're going to get lucky. I think they end up with a top 5 pick this year, because it won't be too long before the team quits on Wilson again, like they did last year. They'll be able to draft a future QB to sit behind Rodgers next year. If Rodgers can't go, or gets hurt again, they just make the move at that point in time.

Now that the Rams traded Akers, I'd definitely take that offer. With the RB's you have, you need a starter you can rely on. If you really want to hang on to some Spears, see if he'll just do Lamb for Nacua and Williams.

Long term, I still like Wilson over Moore. I think Moore is going to be an "ok" WR, but nothing more. There was no WR of note on that team last year, and none this year. He has no reason why he can't separate himself from the others, unless he's not good enough. We'll see how he does this year, and maybe he can change my mind, but so far after the first two games, I think he's at best a WR4. That's a great haul from this year's draft.

Yup, and that got him all the way up to WR27 on the week. He was WR22 last week. On the season (as short it is), he's a low end WR2/high end WR3 right now. He was drafted to be top 5 to 7. Right now, he's at best, a flex play. Because of that, I'll have him on the bench until I think he's better than one of my other 3 WR's. Last year, in half his games, he had single digit points. Yeah, he had a few monster games, but it's clear that you can only play him in games where the matchup works. If the matchup is 50/50 or harder, bench him.

I wouldn't have either... not with Zach Wilson at QB. I have Garrett Wilson on the bench because of that dude.

It's the national message, not just have an open house for parents to come to a school. At every turn, come Summer during election years, when we're bombarded with ads and what not, EVERY LIBERAL candidate is telling people how racist white conservatives are and how oppressed black people are. You're going to tell me that over 70 years, that message hasn't ingrained itself in society?

Ok, so black people don't vote... it's only white people voting for Democrats and those policies and agenda's are having a greater negative impact on black lives?

Spoken like a true leftist. Ignore ways to help and keep promoting things that won't, just so you can say that conservatives don't have answers. You jump when your leftist masters tell you to, don't you?

No, it wasn't. Instead of the Democrat leadership (locally and nationally), telling black people that they are victims and white conservatives hate them, how about taking the conservative approach and telling them that they aren't victims and that being more involved in their kids education will greatly improve their children's chances on a productive future. That in turn will help their lives as well.

You've been arguing with for 5+ pages, when you literally said exactly what I said. Yet, you called me a racist!

That's in reference to Baltimore. There's been less than 5 Republican's in political office, in the city of Baltimore, since the Civil Rights Act.

I think it's funny that you guys say this. It's exactly what I said. Democrat ideology. I simply mentioned that it's a bigger issue for black folks than white. I didn't say it was the black people's fault, I said it was the Democrats policies and ideology that is having a greater negative impact on black people.

Wow! The irony is astounding... and to think, some board members think that the Democrats are the "educated" group.

LOL, this is ironic.

Historically, you are correct, but things are very different today... and over the last 70 years, than they were the prior hundred. Black people today have tons of opportunities, they just have to go get them. Even the poor ones. Go to school, get good grades, & graduate. That's all they need to do. They can go to a community college. You can even get 4 year degrees from community colleges today. They never have to leave their homes. The problem is that too many buy the racist bull crap and how the country is against them, they continue to stay in their ways instead of advancing their livlihoods.

When you take that out of context, well yeah, that's what you get. You chose to ignore the rest of the statement. The next sentence said what? It's said, "Not across the whole race, but it's more prevalent among black folks... but it stems from a culture issue and a culture that has listened to Democrats for 70 years." You and I both agree it's a culture issue, you said so earlier in this thread that you think it's a culture issue. I simply pointed out that the culture was created by the dominance of their culture putting faith in the Democrat party. That's why black people struggle in this country.

I wasn't playing the race card either. I wasn't pointing out that Democrat policies are negatively affecting black people. It's being proven in Baltimore. The culture is the issue, the culture that has been derived from the Democrat ideology over the last 70 years. Proof? Go look up how many Republican's sat on a governmental seat in the city of Baltimore, the County of Baltimore, and the 7th legislative district of Maryland since 1950. When you find out that the answer is less than FIVE, maybe you're realize that the political platform in Baltimore IS in fact, the problem.

Interesting. I always heard it was 7 years. Or is that something different... like presumed dead with no body?

Tim proved my point...

I think that proves my point, right? Neither Vermont nor New Hampshire have racial demographics higher than the national average, where as Baltimore (and cities alike), can be as much as 5x the national average (the city of Baltimore is 65% black). Neither Vermont nor New Hampshire have major cities with extreme racial disparities against the national average. Baltimore has more than 10x the black people (375k), than Vermont and New Hampshire (30k), combined. When you have policies that negatively impact a group of people, and that group represents two-thirds of your population, the results are pretty clear.

Both are actually right. It is systemic racism caused by liberal policies.

Agreed, I don't trust polls, so like you, I'll believe it when I see it.