TBayXXXVII

So your prior post was just trolling then?

I heard on the radio that Zach Ertz's wife retired too, after their loss in the World Cup.

They focked around, they found out. Good. I don't care about the races of any interaction... if the dipsh!ts get their azz kicked, they deserved it.

/thread

Gerrymandering is only relevant at the federal level, meaning House and Senate seats. If you take away the importance of the federal level seats, you reduce the need for gerrymandering. When you run for a seat on your towns council, districts are meaningless because the whole town votes for you (except major cities which are already monopolized by Democrats already). Same with the county and state level. The whole county votes for you. The whole states votes for the governor and they're all popular vote. Except for the major cities, there's not need to gerrymander.

He's a troll, nothing more nothing less. I read his posts, laugh at him, and move on. That's what everyone should do.

He's going to end up enraging the LGBTQ group and not be allowed on college campuses.

If the scope of government fell at the local level, gerrymandering wouldn't even be an issue. The only reason why it's a real issue is to win congressional seats. If you reduce the power of the congress by keeping everything as local as possible, there's virtually no need to for gerrymandering.

The problem with this country is that whenever there's a problem at the local level, meaning as small as a 500 resident town, the result needs to be kicked up to the federal level all the time. We handle too many things in DC when the vast majority of things should be handled at the state level, as intended. The result is national polarization, too much control at the federal level, and too much bull crap in the media.... abortion is something that comes to mind with this, and so is marriage. Neither of these things need to be handled at the federal level, but simply at the state level. Too many people complain on other people's behalves and want the minority to force the majority into things they don't want. It's quite simple really, if you want a law passed, vote for the people IN YOUR state, who will do it. The only things that should be taken care of at that federal level is infrastructure (the way it's intended - not the liberal version where everything falls under infrastructure), military, protect the borders, and taxation. Not that hard. If you don't like the way things are done in your state, vote in the other people or move. If you have an opinion that 9 other people disagree with, why should they have to live by your opinion?

Are we to assume that Archer is an expert on Federal law?

Link

The Communist Regime (sorry, the Obama administration), already acquitted her of any wrong doing and the investigations were over before Trump even ran in the primary. Plus, we know she was guilty, Comey even said as much, before he said they weren't going to prosecute her because she already destroyed the evidence.

Well, he's not wrong.

I'm not a fan of guns, but Sara Gonzales' response (whether this tweet is real or not), is the reason I will always support 2A.

When I was younger, I'd have agreed with you, but as I got older and saw the results of the Crime Bill and the Telecommunications Bill that he passed... might be 2 of the worst bills that this country enacted in about a hundred years. Both had massive negative affects on the country that are still plaguing us today.

The independents are being turned off by liberal policies and the bull crap Biden regime. They're already voting Red. What your side is doing is helping Trump win the primary.

It's funny because I remember in middle school, the message from the Global Warming constituency, was that we needed to stop using paper and aluminum and move to plastic to help secure the environment.

My guess is that the laws are written to where if the parent who owes child support is in arrears, then they have their visitation reduced. If that's not the case, then I don't know what they're talking about.

People should be allowed in... but not out. Let the communists congregate in one spot and leave them there.

Based on how he handled everything or his policies?

In the 4 games to end last season, Moss started 3 of them. In the one he didn't, he had 24 carries. In those games, he totaled 4 receptions, 346 yards, and 1 td, that's 44 points, an average of 11 fpg. That's not a good average. It's worse when you realize that in one of those games he had 21 of those 44 points... against Houston. Moss stinks. He's not even worth a roster spot. Just how I see it. Strong has an upside, sure, it's a bit of a long shot, bu Moss only has a downside. If I'm going flyer on the Colts backfield, I'm taking Hull, not Moss.

Nailed it.

Yeah, she's been around a long time. I think all the ladies who work the women's college games are really good, Burke, Rowe, Rebecca Lobo, Leiberman, etc.

I like Doris Burke in the girls college bball games.