TBayXXXVII

Yes, the Supreme Court should allow the states to do as they wish... BUT, not at the cost of violating someone's rights. There's no issue here. The Supreme Court should ALWAYS... 100% of the time, side with someone's rights over the government - at ANY level.

I don't read liberal sites, when a board communist said it was a bi-partisan measure, then I assumed that elected Republicans were involved as well.

I don't care if they do or don't, my main point was that the people involved at the state level (who are Republican's), should be recalled. If the measure went through, then the right thing to do by the public is to write him in.

While it is not "official", the lawmakers in Maine and Colorado are planning to have Trump not on the ballot. A scenario where that happens, is what I'm referring to for the write-in ballots.

Yes.

We can't end racism until people stop voting for Democrats.

Every Republican in Colorado and Maine, who actually cares about democracy, should sign a recall petition against every Republican involved in taking Trump off the ballot. Then, come November, every one of them should write-in Trump, forcing the states to count a million+ (in CO), write-in's and over a 100k in Maine. The ONLY reason to push this, is because the powers that be in those states, think Trump is going to take the state.

FIFY

Oh, I agree, but you'll never hear anyone on the left who thinks that the news they're getting is bias. Well, that's not true. They do know there's a "slight" bias. LOL

Liberals don't see the media bias... they just see Fox News as the ones who lie.

That may be. I haven't watched many Chargers games.

The result may have been to some. But that game was pretty crappy. To someone with no hat in the ring, wanting to watch "good football", they were disappointed.

It's not possible for a liberal to say that a man can't get pregnant because they're all in lock step that if a woman says she's a man, then she's a man... period. If that woman gets pregnant, by proxy, a man has to be able to be pregnant. So, in essence, a liberal must either say a man can get pregnant or they say there are two genders and women can't be men. No liberal EVER says the second part, so they must then subscribe to "Men can get pregnant".

Liberalism, today, is leftism. They get 0 benefit of the doubt from me. If a liberal says they don't think men can get pregnant, they're only saying that in an environment where they feel threatened.

You just have more faith in liberals than I do.

I think your percentages are too optimistic. I think the numbers are closer to... 15% aren't afraid to be honest. 35% have an opinion but are deathly afraid of the woke mob. 50% are just crazy people who buy into anything or live for virtue points. I don't think there are any liberals who are worthy of giving the benefit of the doubt to.

I have a feeling the Chiefs know this (not specific to fantasy, but know they need a WR... BAD), and they're going to write Mike Evans a blank check in the off-season.

I think the biggest issue is that none of will ever and can never, know how quickly they pickup and how well these guys learn, the playbook. Knowing where and when to be at a spot is more important that actually catching the ball. The QB will never throw it to a spot unless they believe the WR will be there.

I'm going to guess it was seafoam and MDC in a close match. My guess is that seafoam made a post (or two), and MDC wasn't far behind with a post laughing at seafoam for posting on Christmas Day.

Imagine the ratings if the games didn't suck!

He's an Uncle Tom grrrrrr.... You're a racist, grrrrrrrr!!!!! Liberals HATE people like Sowell, because he destroys their platform.

I don't go on twitter... who's getting the party backing? The black guy or the transgender? Curious to see who the bigger "victim" is.

His crystal ball wasn't working. According to @iam90sbaby, because Reagan didn't know what was going to happen in the future, that was Reagan's fault.

I'm starting to think that you know absolutely nothing about Ronald Reagan's tenure.

And I'm the partisan? LOL, there's literally videos ON C f'king NN of Biden groping a little girl's chest. Rape, no, he wasn't found guilty of rape. A bunch of partisan NY'ers believed a woman because she wasn't Donald Trump. That was a 100% political jury decision. Women let Trump touch their genitalia? Let me know why it's a problem that a woman gives consent to a man to touch them please? Also, just to make sure we're addressing things correctly, please provide the clip when Trump says the women let HIM (specifically), do that and that HE (specifically), did do it... you know, because from what I heard, sounded like he was making an in-general statement of observation. LOL, the Miss USA contest, he was "allegedly" exploiting and trafficking underage women? Again, yeah, I'M the partisan. LOL