TBayXXXVII

Exactly. I even saw one "fact check" website say... what @squistion is saying. They said claimed that "Believe All Women" was a Republican thing and their proof was a quote that the original statement was that "Every woman should be believed". Like you said, no, it's not "Believe All Women", but yeah, it's the exact same thing.

Still sticking to that eh?

So we're back to not "believing all women" again?

The push for EV's will result in the same thing that every other liberal pushed venture... being worse than what was in existence causing more problems down the road. As a prime example, see paper vs plastic.

Probably because the liberals special interest groups are heavily into Lithium mining.

Appreciate the info, but lets be honest... in both instances, the data is being created (or analyzed from), the people who are trying to sell you the product. It's like having someone who works for Chevy telling you why Chevy's are the best product.

Salon? LOL

Cherry picking? No, I'm telling you what their results were. Why didn't I quote that? Because it's not realistic. You can't come to a conclusion of "no causation" when there's a "significantly higher" rate in one group than the other. There HAS TO BE a cause. Even if you want to blame the straight white conservatives male (who doesn't exist in those areas), you have to have a cause.

Under the "Results" section... DIRECT QUOTE! "And, when all 100 of America’s largest cities are grouped together, all violent crime rates (with the exception of rape) are significantly higher in cities with Democratic mayors."

You literally said: "Watson has elite elite speed. Burks does not. I think his upside is way more" I simply pointed out that the two aren't that far apart. I agreed that Watson was fast, posted a link saying hit almost hit 21 mph... but also posted a link where Burks was clocked at 22.6 mph.

I think you're naïve to how fast Burks is. Yeah, at the Combine Watson ran a 4.36 and Burks a 4.55, but Burks is fast. Here's an example. At the end of that article, based on watching him play, they projected Burks to run a 4.37 at the Combine. Just because he didn't, it doesn't mean he's not fast. As I said, the Combine isn't the be-all-end-all, that goes for Watson too. Just because he ran a 4.36, doesn't mean that's the fasted he can run, but here's an article on game speed about him. He hit 20+ mph 12 times last year, with his top being 20.97. As you saw in the link I gave you with Burks, he hit over 22 mph. So it's not like they're all that different. I don't think either has more upside than the other, I think they're both top end guys.

Maybe. That doesn't always work though, as we all know. You think Clements wouldn't say great things about the guy he has no choice but to work with? Allen and Roethlisberger were drafted to be Day 1 starters... Love was drafted knowing that he wouldn't play for at least 3 years. Big difference. Yeah, Rodgers went to a community college, but he did play multiple years in the Pac 10... Love can't say that.

I'm always skeptical of small college QB's. Yeah, I know, "Utah State is Div 1". But the MWC is mediocre at best. I know his last year he had a new coach, but I wouldn't have cared less either way. I know you're going to give me a "he help his own against KC", song and dance, and how he played well when he came in. Yeah, he came in when they were getting blown out in some of those games. I don't really watch a lot of college football, but I've watched games here and there when a lot of people were talking him up back in the day. When I watched him, he did put up good numbers, but it always looked like he drops back, waits for his WR to outrun the DB, then heaves it downfield. That'll work in the Mountain West Conference, it won't work in the NFL. I think a lot of NFL people thought that too, which is why he dropped into the mid-20's. I think the only reason he got drafted there was because the Packers were probably stroking their ego thinking they could hit on another later first round pick again, while sitting him for a few years. I think Burks and Watson are on the same level. I think the Packers got a steal with Watson. The reason I favor Burks is our keeper system. The fact that Burks went to Tennessee was the reason I was able to use a later pick on him and get him at a cheaper price. In a sense, I see Watson and Burks at the same level of talent, but because of cost to keep players, is the reason I'm choosing Burks. If they were the same price or closer, I'd have gone with Watson. I'll add that I think Love is the better of the 3 QB's involved, including Willis and Levis, but as you said and we already know, there's a lot more talent in the WR room in GB to spread the ball around. In Tennessee, there's Burks and 5 JAG's. I expect Burks to be a target monster.

Watson isn't the guy I'm worried about... I think he's a high end talent with a good shot to be a great NFL WR. I think Love is gonna blow chunks. I think the Packers are drafting new QB in 24 months, maybe 12. Aaron Rodgers, since 2017 has been a 1-target guy, where Adams would get like 80 targets more than the next guy. Last year proved what most of us knew, that Lazard is a JAG. Watson & Doubs were the real talent in that locker room... the problem was that neither could stay on the field together. I think they played 7 games together all year. This year, had they kept Rodgers, I think would've mimicked a year like 2016 (just not quite to the extent that Nelson and Adams reached). I think both could've been in the 85 reception, 1100 yard, 10 TD range (if they stayed healthy). With Love, I think the ceiling is that one of them might come close to that. Meaning, Watson be at 80, 950, and 7 and Doubs being at 70, 800, and 4... again, "ceiling". Nothing wrong with those numbers, I mean, that's decent WR2 numbers for Watson, but I think he's a top 7 guy with Rodgers.

Yeah, because the Right is the side that wants to mandate EV's. LOL

Because liberals are everywhere. We need to ban them.

Just so you don't make a false generalization, that laughing emoji is me. I'm not laughing at the situation, I'm laughing at you.

I don't. Liberal media and politicians are national, not local.

How do you know she's a liberal? I wasn't talking about her anyway. It's the vast majority of the Democrat party/electorate who need to leave. Kids like this young lady would never have been a victim of this incident had there not been politicians, media outlets, activists, and people in general (Liberals), promoting policies that increase, promote, and condone violence in this country.

I think this problem goes away if we ban Liberals. I mean, we don't need them. They should be forced to go live in Canada, Venezuela, Cuba, Russia, and China where they can live in their government controlled / gunless utopias.

If we fix climate change though, all our problems will be taken care if.

LOL, yes it does.

I can give you a list of liberal politicians demanding hate crime charges against white people... can you give me a list of politicians demanding hate crime charges when the victim is white?

You'd think that the people championing the cause of "equality", would make sure that all versions of hate crimes get pursued.... yet, they are silent. Why do you think that is? My guess, when they are championing hate crimes.... they're just pandering.