TBayXXXVII

The Steelers are doing the right thing. If you don't have a franchise QB, don't spend $30M+ on a JAG. Save $20M, and give some rando $10M and spend that $20M on building a better team around said rando. Bide your time until you believe you can draft one. Right now, I see 5 franchise QB's in the NFL... Mahomes, Burrow, Jackson, Allen, and Herbert. I believe Burrow was the only one taken in the top 5, so teams don't have to tank, they just have to be right. Of the other 4, the team that drafted them, had to trade up to get them, so you don't even have to be a "bad" team. The Bills had pick 12 I believe, and traded up to #7 to get Allen. KC traded up from the 20's I believe, to #10 and the Ravens traded back into the 1st round to get Jackson at #32. If the Steelers think there's a franchise QB in this draft, they should be proactive in trying to get him. They're picking at #21, to get to pick 10, it should only cost a 3rd this year and a 1st and 3rd next year. From what I've read, people are all of the place on who's a 1st rd QB, who's not, and who's a top 5 pick and who's not. One could fall pretty far to where compensation might be minimal. They also might be able to get a guy later in the draft, someone like Howard, Dart, or Riley... who at the very least/worst, may be just as good as Kenny Pickett. Some may laugh, but Pickett was 14-10 as a starter with Pittsburgh and they had a winning record those 2 years and made the playoffs in one of them.

It's the typical leftist cancel culture. If they disagree with you politically, and you have control, their group think hits you financially.

You're right, he should've done what everyone else was doing... hiding it.

You're better off destroying the place and rebuilding it than you are wasting the money slow playing it. On top of that, you're getting your military personnel killed. Around 100k Russians fighting in this war have been killed. There's no way that it's cheaper, better, or planned to draw this incursion out for 3+ years, getting approximately 100k of your own people killed, spending all that money, and using all of those military resources than it would be if you leveled a few infrastructure and military installations necessary to bring Ukraine down.

If you're supposedly the 3rd or 4th best military in the world and you can't beat Ukraine and 3 days before they got any help from anyone, you're either not really trying or your military isn't that strong. If we wanted to take over Ukraine, we'd do it 3 hours... let alone 3 days. Russia's military is a joke.

If they actually beat Ukraine, they'd have all of the land. Hence, it's not a W.

We shouldn't have even been involved in this in the first place. We're choosing to help the lesser of two evils. It would be like China invading North Korea and we jump in to help North Korea because they're the ones who got invaded. The only reason we got involved in this, is because Biden is a corrupt politician who got help from Ukraine to make his son independently wealthy.

Then you'd be wrong.

Russia can't beat Ukraine... you think they're going to beat a NATO country?

I know this isn't you, but this is absurd. "Very good"? The dude was elite and one of the 3 best in the NFL during his prime. The Jets were crappy with Saleh before Rodgers got there.

I wouldn't be surprised, the dude is corrupt as heII and a total scumbag.

You're positive that the Navajo tribe didn't wipe out any other tribes in their pursuit of land?

You remind me of Dems who think they're smart but are actually incompetent.

Blocked? No, I'm not a b!tch like Squistion, I just skip over their comments 95% of the time.

They're probably finally turn a profit now. They lost $40M last year, but apparently their new deal will get them 4x more than the previous one. They should give Clark $50M just for being in the league. LOL Without here, that deal is no where near that high.

The OP doesn't have thoughts, he's a leftist parrot troll.

The problem is that the messaging from the Democrat party is the easy way out and that women are convinced they're victims. The Republican's shouldn't do that. The Republican's are fighting for women in sports and Democrats are still coming out with a pro-trans movement and women are still backing them. College women, because that's who's voting Democrat, are brainwashed. That's not going to change.

You're saying that Republican's should actively make victims out of women and blame Democrats for it? I mean, that's what the Democrats are doing... which apparently is working. You seem to agree with that agenda.

This young lady agrees with you.

Oh, ok. I gotchya. You're ok with deportations, you're just not ok when the left-wing media & politicians politicize it and right-wing online trolls laugh about it? Seems like the root of your problem is the left-wing media and politicians. Not sure why you're complaining about it on an online message board that NO left wing media members or politicians visit.

They're putting out the ones where it's criminals. You know, to let the people in the country know that their country is getting safer. You do know that the vast majority of this country is ok with that, right?

The OP's link was from mercurynews.com, out of San Jose, CA. Do you think that is a right or left leaning outlet? My money is on left. Seems like that's where your ire should be directed. The vast majority of coverage on these deportations from right leaning outlets, are focusing in on the criminals. That should give comfort to those who do favor deportations of the that type of people. The occasional person because caught in this, like the ones in this article, are being covered by left leaning outlets.

Was Biden using them as political pawns when he was deporting illegal immigrants? How about Obama when he was deporting them? Or is it only political when Trump does it? How come there weren't Democrat politicians and media outlets encouraging outrage when Obama and Biden deported those people? The only conclusion I can draw is that it's only political when a Republican does it.