TBayXXXVII

I'll take your deflection as saying I'm right.

Does getting shot count?

Any decision that a DEI hire makes, is woke. It's the reason that person was put in that place.

@Stu82... what @Ray_T said.

If you have to start 2 RB's, easy, Irving in the 15th. You're getting an RB1 at the price of a kicker. This decision is made even easier if players round value increases. Next year, you'd probably have to give up a 2nd for Nabers where as you'd have to give up a 12th for Irving.

If you say so.

The first four weeks? Maybe. You should probably be able to grab him off the waiver wire after the draft though. In the 14 games he played, 68.8 of 140.6 fantasy points came in Weeks 7-9 when Godwin, Evans, and McMillan were out. ADP says he's TE23, going 193 off the board, a 12-team league generally has what, 168 players (who aren't K's or DE's)? If you waited late to draft a TE and you got someone like Tucker Kraft, grabbing Otton late could give you a few weeks to see what's going on in GB.

The arguments they're making, aren't wrong. Pointing out what's happening isn't "complaining" or calling for a boycott.

Two of those (#1 & #3), are pretty reasonable.

After reading up on this a little bit, this looks like a nothing burger. People across both aisles think this is a bad idea and the market showed it. I didn't see anyone saying they're not going anymore. I don't see anything about mass calls to boycott. All I saw was Jr tweet "WTF?" Looks like liberal media making it political more than anything else.

Sadly, the country would fock it up and elect more of the same.

It couldn't have hurt. Isn't Hooters big in the south? I don't find them to be that big up here.

Everyone is paying over $10 for pancakes. I don't recall the last time I paid less than $10 for pancakes.

Don't know, this thread is the first I heard of it. If I had to guess, it's a deviation from historic pride. White washes it. Basically tells their customer base, that they don't want them any more.

There's one in Pennsville just off of the Delaware Memorial Bridge and one in Mt. Laurel (next to Cherry Hill), not sure of others in South Jersey. Would need to google it.

Funny how that works out, huh? I mean, they have the worst public schools (because that's where the poor/minorities are), they have the worst crime rates (because, that's where the poor/minorities are), and the elites get to stay far away from them. They use the money that they make pandering to the poor/minorities, to make the elitist areas great. Then, they get to tell everyone how great of people they are. Meanwhile, the poor are still poor, they're still poorly educated, and they're still victims. Go figure.

I think Trump should assemble a private investigative team to search the home, finances, and technology device of every federally elected politician and employee. Who can pay for it? Simple, the 90% who are found guilty of the litany of crimes they committed, pay for it. The ones who are guilty, we will seize all of their assets to pay the bills. Then, we can hit the 50 governors. Probably take down a good 20+ of them too. Lets get rid of the criminal element in our government and start fresh.

Just my 2 cents... Cracker Barrell is like Bob Evans, they have a niche. They should stick with that niche. When I traveled to the south and went to those places, they were hopping. Very busy and the food was fine (well, Bob Evans was, like I said, didn't care for Cracker Barrell), but the clientele seemed to love it. They tried to expand up north, apparently. The few I've been to up here were only a slight upgrade from Denny's. My guess is that expanding out of their wheelhouse caused the quality of their product to decline. Both chains would be best served saying in their market and catering to that crowd. If you stop doing that and try to cater to others, you're going to lose your base and not gain new people fast enough. I think both chains are going to progressively fade out of existence in the future if they keep with their current agenda.

Don't know or care about what Cracker Barrell did or didn't do... I never liked their food anyway so I never go there.

Nope. I never take QB's early. I decided to try that this year in the FFToday mock and took Daniels in the 4th. Didn't like the result. I felt like I was chasing every round thereafter. Jackson averaged 25 fpg last year, his norm is around 21/22, I wouldn't bank on 25 again. You can get good QB production in every round... there's no need to do it in R's 2, 3, 4, or 5, when that's where the best RB/WR talent is. I'd want at least 2 (preferably 3), RB's and 3 (preferably 4 or 5), WR's and maybe 1 TE, before I'd even consider a QB. Waiting until R8 (for example), to take a QB will likely land you Jared Goff, Dak Prescott, Justin Fields, or Justin Herbert... all of which who could get you about 19+ fpg. If you didn't want to wait that long, Mayfield is probably the best value on the board going in R6. He's got great targets, an excellent OLine, a great backfield that isn't run dependent, and a fairly aggressive offence. Do I think he throws for 4500 and 41 again this year? No, but I think 4200 and 35 is realistic. Gotta figure he'll give you something running... call it 250 and 2. All of those are a regression and would still get you 20 fpg. Now, those are ADP's. I don't think in home leagues, Mayfield goes that early. Again, look at the FFToday mock that we did, Mayfield went in the 8th. Look at those other guys I mentioned... Goff and Fields went in the 9th, Dak the 11th and Herbert in the 12th.

It was actually a trick question. Player B is Tyreek Hill. I was curious to see if anyone would say no to both when we know the results of one of them. Listening to Siriusxm, guys were doing this with callers to see how people reacted. The hosts would give 2 players with similar numbers in similar situations and ask what they thought the odds were off success for both players. One of the two were always an established veteran, be it someone who was a stud or a dude. Curious to see how people here would participate. Clearly, not many people were interested in the exercise. LOL

That was my thought when he was hired. After their offseason, I'm not so sure. Tampa had substantially more talent than the Jags have.

I can see him being more impactful on the NFL game than the fantasy aspect. Let's say he is a stud... how many plays is he going to be able to run on both sides of the ball, before he dies? There's no way this dude runs more than 55% of the teams overall snaps and stays healthy. Here's how I see it... early on in games, when he's fresh, he'll probably be all over the field. But how fresh will he be as each game winds down. He won't have a full series to rest up like everyone else. He'll get beat up faster. He'll get tired faster. He'll be out there catching (benefit of the doubt), passes and helping the offense move the ball... but for how long? How effectively? How many times will he have to drop an open pass because he's exhausted in the 3rd quarter, before they give him a 2 to 3 consecutive series rest? How many times will he need to be burned for a big play on defense, because he's exhausted, before they give him a 2 to 3 consecutive series rest? How many weeks will he go before he's physically exhausted. We all know these guys are young, but we hear all the time (and see it), how rookies are metered or hit a wall. Playing both sides of the ball will get him to his wall faster. If I draft him and he has a strong start? I'm trading him. I'll risk him being a unicorn to get a sell high/buy low deal.

Possibly.

Irony from the pro-slavery / communist.