TBayXXXVII

Before steroids, Bonds was a H.O.F.er.

Thanks for proving my point that liberals are such suckers as per the irony of your post.

Probably because women are nuts, but that's only a guess. Seriously though, I'm thinking it's not accurate. Women aren't physically as violent as men. I have a hard time believing that lesbians would have a higher rate of domestic violence than heterosexual men or even gay men. If I had to guess most likely to least likely to be involved it would be... 1. Transgenders (w/anyone), because it is a mental illness. Those people need help. I'd fully expect half of these relationships to involve domestic violence. 2. Gay men, because men still are men. Two of them means double the likelihood. Now, I'm guessing the physical damage would be less, but the occurrence rate, I'd expect to be the 2nd most frequent. 3. Heterosexual relationships. Because men are stupid. 4, Lesbians, because women aren't that violent. I'd expect them to have the highest non-report occurrences though.

Boring... I never heard of the vast majority of those people.

Started reading that article, I bailed. He’s literally playing the victim. We WeRe LiEd To!!!

He, as well as both Hillary and Bill campaigned on building a "barrier", between the US and Mexico... and that was 'ok', because a "barrier" and a "wall" are (D)ifferent.

I don't think there's a single person that Obama nor Harris wouldn't have thrown under the bus, if it meant getting Trump. If the Epstein list came out in October with Trump on it, Harris wins in November, I have no doubt of that. There's a strong likelihood that most of the scum that went to Epstein Island are white politicians and Hollywood A-listers (any race), and Harris and Obama, as big of racists that they are, they'd throw every one of them under the bus to Harris in the White House.

They were "Democrats", not "Leftists" nor were they trolls.

Exactly. If Trump was on that list, there's a 0.0% chance Obama doesn't put it out there in 2016.... unless Bill and Hillary were on it.... Even still, Biden's DOJ has been going after Trump since the day he took office. If Trump were on the list, his DOJ absolutely would put it out there, prior to the election.

You'd be wasting your time with her too, lol. But in this case, he's also a troll. He knows he's full of crap with his posts and doesn't care, no matter how many times you prove it to him.

You should ask yourself, why are you even bothering to respond to his post. You're wasting your time. Even far left "media" outlets state that there's no evidence that Trump was ever at Epstein Island.

Liberals are such suckers. Is there anyone in the country that liberals HATE more than Donald Trump? Hillary would sell out her husband, Pelosi would sell out hers, Harris & Obama would sell out everyone, to take Trump down. If the Democrats had any proof that Trump was actually involved in Epstein's affairs or parties, it would've come out by now. If not in the Republican primaries in 2015, then the general election in 2016. If not then, it would've come out during one of the two impeachment trials. If not then, it would've surfaced during the 2020 election. If not then, it would've come up this past election. Clearly, there's no evidence tying Trump to Epstein.

Spain, in the 1600's.

I think the problem the Democrats were going to have was that regardless who ran, they had no answers. It's why they had to keep Biden and/or Harris on the ticket. If they had a strong candidate that they needed to win, that candidate would've had to trash the Biden / Harris administration because the key topics that the country was concerned with, Biden and Harris had horrible policies. Even when asked about it, Harris never even addressed the issues. She said she wouldn't have done anything differently than Biden. So the only path that someone like Newsom, Shapiro, or someone else, was to say that mistakes were made and changes need to happen. That was NOT going to happen. There's no way they could campaign on an economic and immigration policy that would be similar to Trump, especially since they've been trashing those agenda's for 8 years. They needed to sink or swim on losing policies and hope their name calling was enough to distract the public. Many on this board fell for that hook, line, and sinker, and still do.

Here's my reasoning, we all saw the campaign they ran. It was all about the "Who's who" of victimhood. They never discussed the economy and immigration to the standards at which was obvious that were the most important to the citizens... as well as government funded transgender surgery as we later found out. Throughout the election run, even when Biden was the expected candidate, these topics were the most important according to all the polls (even though I'm not really a big supporter of them), and the only answers the Democrats had... and STILL to this day, talk about, is how Trump is a liar, a felon, and racist. They're playing the victim instead of discussing the topics. They wanted to win and hoped their bs campaign would work, but I don't think they expected it too. I mostly think it's the billionaires we don't know about, who fund the party, and the higher ups who just pander and never actually give answers. I don't think people like Elizabeth Warren even know who's calling the shots.

I didn't say they wanted to lose, I said they knew they were going to lose and were willing to accept it. Harris was the only candidate they could get to take job. No real candidate, like Shapiro in PA, wanted any part of this campaign. THAT's why he wasn't the VP choice. He and the party knew this was a losing ticket. It's why they chose Walz, who was just as unlikeable as Harris. They didn't care about him, he can go back to Minnesota and run for something there. Also, I noted that it was the people actually running the party. The true shot callers... not the rank and file morons like AOC and the like.

I wouldn't be surprised if the people actually running the Democrat party were perfectly fine with losing this past election. They know they focked up and didn't know how to get it back under control. So, their plan was to just let crap happen. If Harris won, they keep going while continually lying to the public that the problems of the country were set in place by Trump and useful idiots like some on this board, will go along with it. If Trump won, they wait until 2028 and blame Trump for everything that went wrong. The Democrats were going to either lose in 2024 or 2028. They knew this. They probably felt that it was better to lose in 2024 and hope that Trump fixes most of their fockups (yet still blame him for all kinds of crap), and take a shot at 8 straight years... 2028-2034, than it would be if they won in 2024 but lose from 2028-2034. To me, this is why Trump and Musk are more reliable than either of the two parties. With Trump and Musk, I know who's in charge. If Harris won, we know she wasn't in charge and have no idea who was, just like we have no idea who was calling the shots under Biden. Had someone other than Trump won the primary in 2015, Republican's would be in the same boat.

The ones that had evaluations, were the departments that were told they didn't have to respond.

I'm guessing that's the idea, but I can tell you this, I would have loved to been a fly on the wall in some of those offices.

They have until tonight, at midnight. So, IF they got in to work today on time, they would have 16 hours to complete the task. Do you need more than 16 hours to tell you boss what you did last week?

DEI for the win, am I right?

I don't support either one. I think both countries are crooked and I don't see a reason why we need to say "we support this one because they're less crooked."

I think every one of them are guilty of 1 of 2 things..... 1) Actively participating in illegal activity Or 2) Knowing illegal activity was going on, and looked the other way.

I wouldn't be surprised if all of them were Seafoam, Gutterboy, or Rusty, in some form or fashion.