TBayXXXVII

Something I heard today on the fantasy sports channel (I think it was Jeff Mans), is that he thinks that Jeanty may be in contention with Bowers, for the most targets on the team. Last year, between Ameer Abdullah, Sincere McCormick, Alexander Mattison, Zamir White tallied about 300 carries and totaled around 1100 yards (3.6 ypc). I don't see why with 220 carries, White can't average 4.0 (at worst). From that standpoint, you're looking at 880 yards. They never addressed the hole at WR, so lets say that Mans might be right. Lets give Jeanty 115 targets (Bowers had 153 last year), and 75 receptions while averaging 7 yards per reception. You're talking about a RB with 1400 yards and 75 receptions. That's 215 fantasy points without taking into account TD's. Last year, that would be RB19. Give him 10 TD's, now he's at RB7. I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility that he could be a top 5 RB.

Outside of wanting to breed or find a genetic history of illness, is there a reason to want to do this? I would also assume you'd want this before purchasing the dog... no? Just curious as this is something that I would not even consider doing.

It's almost as if the guns themselves aren't the problem... but the people obtaining them through illegal means.

Nope.

Yes, mental torture is worse than physical. I thought this was already known. They actively create victims. That's a huge problem. Then, they pander to them and blame someone else. Meanwhile, they never actually fix the problem... they just move the goalposts.

...and that's where you lose. Just stop dude. You're already wrong... you've double downed, you've triple downed, just end it. I'm going to stop your bleeding for you.

To HIM, not gay people. You said it was a slight to gay people as she was "homophobic". That's where you're wrong. You trying a bait and switch here? LOL LOL, the new Rick Roll ="@TimHauck"

Not against gay people, no. The comment only has to do with Olbermann, not gay people.

I just said it wasn't a slight against gay people.

That’s certainly a take.

So you agree that she isn't homophobic then? Good for you. A step in the right direction. Now, just admit you were wrong and that'll be "the end".

Where she's wrong, is lowering herself to the standard that is Keith Olbermann. Her actively trying to trigger him on purpose, using something she know will piss him off, is funny. No, it has nothing to do with gay people... it has everything to do with getting Keith Olbermann's blood pressure up. It again, is why you're wrong.

You're a clown because she's trying to trigger him. She's actively trying to pizz him off. It actually has nothing to do with gay people. You're such an idiot.

Ok, I will start slowly. You are a clown.

LOL, yeah, wrong again. You should say "The end". I'll hold you to it... let's see how long that lasts.

What @TimHauck does is, when he knows he lost, he'll inject an inference that was never made, then hold you accountable to that inference. He'll do that ad nauseum until he can find a gotchya, and claim a win... even though his original point was an actual loss. Then during his lashing out phase, he'll "@" you to call you out, as if he was never wrong in the first place. The best part is, he'll hammer on the fact that you never admitted you were wrong (even though you weren't), but won't admit when he is. ... and we're the ones that are "predictable". The dude is such a clown.

Republicans are bad, never said they weren't. I've always maintained that there's always 537 azzhats in DC and to specifically call one out, is just being a hypocrite. That said, they are bad, but not as bad. The current DNC is the worst political party this planet has ever witnessed. They are quite possibly the most disgusting people to ever live.

She didn't. @TimHauck has a hard time admitting he's wrong, even though he demands it from others.

Thank you for proving me right.

Democrat party leaders care about 1 thing, 1 thing only, and it's literally their only platform.... "How can we pander/create, victimization, blame it on Republican's, and profit from it".

I thought it was funny that @Grace Under Pressure's 3 biggest reasons were based on false assertions and 4 other people liked the post.

A possible steal could be Lawrence. If Coen can get Mayfield to throw for 4500 and 41, Lawrence is way more talented... and with a trash can defense and losing all the time, I can see the Jags throwing the ball 650 times next year and putting up good numbers. If his metrics improve slightly from better game planning and system and he completes 67% of passes, has a TD% of 5 and ypa of say 7.4, with 650 pass attempts you're looking at 4800 yards and 32 TD's. Just those numbers alone translate to about 19 fpg. Let's say that's too aggressive in terms of attempts (I say attempts because the other metrics [comp%, TD%, and ypa] are all perfectly reasonable), and you want to go with just 600 and lets say he rushes for 250 yards and 3 TD's... we'll go with 12 Ints, we're talking about 331 points, approximately 20 fpg. From a total points perspective, last year, that would be QB6. I'm in a 2QB keeper league where I'm either going to keep Burrow or Mayfield (and Penix because he's almost free), but I'm going to target Lawrence for my QB2. If he's going as QB19, I can probably get him in the 3rd or 4th round of my draft and not have to get into the dog pile that usually happens in the first 2. In a 1 QB league, I may be willing to chance it and take him as my QB1, very late.

LOL, I'm sure your leftist propaganda sites had those written out 2 years ago.

LOL, so you have a link that shows all 5M people Biden deported and the "due process" he followed? You also have a link that shows all of the people the Trump deported and the "due process" he followed and/or did not follow, right? Because in his last term, he did things the "legal" way and it worked... so now he's doing it the "illegal" way, just for kicks, right?

I'm ok with the deportations, why would I care if a Democrat is deporting them? Apparently, only Democrats are having a problem NOW, all of a sudden. Almost as if it's purely political.