TBayXXXVII

Now I'm thinking you're one of them as well.

We definitely knows he does have them... I'm probably more of a cynic than most where I think he's a lot more than what others may perceive.

I still think it's Rusty. I wouldn't be shocked if he's the majority of alias' that are nominated.

That may be... but my point still remains.

Agreed, Kimmel's always been like that, just fake click bait videos. I didn't see a need to watch him.

Risky. I not so sure there'll be a market for him getting more than $84M over the next 2 years. Unless he'd be ok with less AAV but more years/money... like 4 for $120M.

So that is her!?! Ugh, what did she do to herself?

I didn't watch that last video, but the graphic.... is that Sandra Bullock, with a ton of bad plastic surgery?

This guy!

From what I've seen/read about her, she comes off worse than Trump. I'm guessing that if she's elected as governor, democrats (more specifically in California), will stop complaining about Trump's personality and ethics. Oh wait, they still will... it's (D)ifferent.

Wow, dude did some great work. Well done by him. R.I.P.

It's because he's trying to get a "gotchya" when one doesn't exist. When he was given information that will not allow him to get his gotchya, he'll move the goalposts to find another way to get it. He's annoying. Now, I just read his nonsense, laugh at him, and move on.

It can be... as long as no federal positions are on the ballot. States can run their own elections any way they see fit. The rest of the country shouldn't have to be forced to accept it.

All registered voters do have the option to request a ballot. At NO POINT, should a ballot be mailed arbitrarily... unless all federal seats are removed.

Nope. The only people who should receive a ballot by mail, is if they requested one... in person, or filled out the forms with the required information. Now, if a state wants to do local elections that way, fine by me. States are allowed to run their voting anyway they wish. That said, anyone running for a federal position, should not be on that ballot.

My thinking was FAAB and he had the most money available in the league.

FAAB or FCFS? I'm guessing FAAB

Agreed. I've always said, the best teams that will yield the best results are the ones where the QB and HC/OC are all on the same page. If one isn't, you'll never maximize your potential. Have all 3, and lesser groupings will still succeed (see Tampa).

The #1 seed's at the 33% mark of the season are lead by Baker Mayfield and Daniel Jones. I'll bet 0 people had that on their bingo cards back in August.

I've always made that argument, but I don't think you can put Mahomes in there. He's been to 5 Super Bowls, won 3. Of those, he did make the Super Bowl 3 times (won twice), after getting paid. Rodgers never went back. Neither Allen or Jackson have ever been there. At least Burrow has made it once in his career (as compared to Allen and Jackson), but I think he has the ability to match Mahomes if they can get an OLine together. Honestly, had they spent the money on that, instead of Higgins, they'd be better off. I believe I read that Cincinnati had the 31st ranked OLine last year along with the 25th ranked defense. Despite that, they missed the playoffs by 1 game. If the Bengals were just 20th at both, they most likely make the playoffs... probably win at least 1 game too.

I think Allen is better than Jackson as well, but here's how I see both... neither are truly great quarterbacks. I think that if Lamar was forced to be even a scrambling QB, he'd only be "ok". He's only a great talent if he has the ability to run. I think Allen would be good, a tier above, but in the same boat. I don't think that you could put a better team around them and yield better results. In saying that, it's why I think both have a true ceiling, even right now when they're at their best. Their ceiling is a great regular season with continual post-season disappointment. At some point in the playoffs, they will always play against "team" that is better than who either Allen or Jackson can beat. Right now, they both have the "Well, we have to get past each other AND Mahomes", excuse. The thing is, IF (a big "if"), Cincinnati ever gets an NFL caliber offensive line together to keep Burrow on the field, the Bengals will be another obstacle for Allen and Jackson. Heck, I don't think either could beat Indy right now... and they have Daniel Jones.

That's correct. Where's the problem? Don't worry, you don't need to answer. It'll probably be dumb like everything else you type.

If I were a gambling man, I'd drop a Ulysses S. Grant on the Bucs to win the chip.

Hot take: Yes, Josh Allen is a great player, but I think in order for him to be at his best, the rest of the team suffers. They weren't better or worse with Diggs (at his peak), than they were last year with jags. Simply, I don't think he makes any player better nor do I think he maximizes his teammates' abilities. Double down... I think the same for Lamar Jackson.

This sounds right to me.