TBayXXXVII

I think the people who used to say "Trust the science", called this kind of thing "evolution". That's not a money grift like "Climate Change" is, so they switched gears.

Only when I was going to a special occasion with a woman. Just making sure she didn't get rained on.

Stop it dude, people are going to the games to watch her!

Definitely a better show than Around the Horn.

I used to watch it when I watched ESPN. At the time, I thought it was pretty good. Obviously, haven't watched it in at least 10 years.

This.

I didn't even know she was still putting out albums.

I think if you want fantasy relevant information on this, you might need to pay for it. Listening to the fantasy sports channel on SiriusXM, the guys from fantasypoints.com (John Hansen), talk about their separation stats a lot. I went to check out their website, and obviously this stat is behind a pay wall. No problem with that, but to get that stat, you need to pay $200 for that subscription. Yeah, ain't happening.

Depends on who the one is that pulled the trigger on Richardson. Oddly, Richardson has a winning record as a starter and Steichen is .500 as the HC. They've been at worst, league average over the last two seasons on offense, but bottom tier on defense. I don't think Steichen's job is at all tied to Richardson... even if it were him that campaigned for him. If it were Ballard, then I think Steichen is definitely safe. I think Jones is a better fit for that offense anyway. He's closer to a comp to Hurts than Richardson is. If Jones shows to be a competent QB in training camp, he might win the job and as long as the defense doesn't stink, they should be at worst, a 9-win team.

He's like 20-25 other QB's in the league. Put a good team around him and he'll produce. Put a bad team around him and he'll be 'meh'.

Come on. That was funny.

I sure don't. "If he dies, he dies".

Self hate?

This is the exact example of government waste that Trump & Musk are/were trying to fix, and all they get from the public, is hate.

Of course they want it.... and no, their citizens aren't paying for it. The federal government does not tax people or states, to award it back to other states to use that money for police protection. What the Federal government is doing, is forcing states who want to avoid using their tax for police enforcement/protection, to not be able to do that anymore. So, states who want to continue on that route without federal help, they can.

Big win for states rights.

Meh, he played 3 years in college. A lot of guys do that. He had 40 starts, so it's not like he was a 1 or 2 year starter with only 12 to 25 starts.

See, that's exactly why I don't understand why the tush push is even legal to begin with. What you stated is illegal. What's the difference between carrying and throwing? In both cases, the person moving the ball isn't on the ground.

Wrong. Its not illegal because Trump isn't using it after he leaves office AND will be paid for by the Air Force on Jan 1, 2029. But, you keep pretending he's doing something wrong.

If it's going to Trump, how come it's going to the library and not being used by Trump? Third time I've asked. Stumped? (again, showing the premise of your question is stupid)

Your premise is an accusation that it's going to be a plane for Trump and not the country. If it's not, then you should have no issue because it's not a gift for Trump. If it's going to the library, who cares and why would you? He would be doing it to be political and taking a gift that "an ally" gave us. It's something that Leftists say is a problem with Trump. They complain he's not political and always petty. Here he's being political, and now it's an issue.

I'm calling out the premise of your question, as being stupid.

If it's going to go to the library, what use does Trump get out of it?

Where's the "whatabout"... calling you a hypocrite? Joe Biden called Qatar a non-NATO ally, did he not? No one had an issue with that, right? Ok, so they're an ally. If they're an ally, and Trump accepted a gift FOR THE COUNTRY, not himself, then there should be no problem. The only way this is a problem, it's because Biden is now out of office and you want to retroactively call Biden wrong, so that you can bash Trump. In other words, you're a hypocrite. It's not a "whataboutism". Now, make another post proving you're an idiot.

I added more.