TBayXXXVII

LOL, this guy thinks his statement only applies to Republicans.

Sounds like a great time to buy. Especially since we're trending down on the inflation rate. MAGA baby. Maybe we can find a way to get 4 more years of Trump after 2028.

Inflation rate is steadily going down. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/inflation-cpi In January, it was at 3%, then 2.8% in February. March, by their numbers, projects to go down 2.5%.

LOL, Fnord thinks that if someone is smarter than him, they're smarter than everyone else on the board. Meaning, he thinks he's the smartest one.

Nah, I was just being an azz. His schtick has gotten old for me. He's only a step down from rusty and gutterboy... not a big one though.

It's not me being obtuse, it's you being slow. I don't think anyone other than slow people, who ever thought influencers were neutral. Influencers go where the money is. If you thought otherwise, that's your fault.

I thought the general was rusty? Is he gutterboy then?

Influencers are made to look more neutral? Where? When? They're bought and paid for... just like lobbyists.

So.... yes then. How are "influencers" any different than "lobbyists"?

Maybe he meant Buffalo. After all, they're the only team that plays in NY.

He couldn't learn from Drew Brees & Sean Payton..... Wilson will probably make the Giants competent. If he gets hurt, they're toast. Now, if they draft a QB this year, he'll probably beat out Winston (who may get cut at that point), and they'll possibly have a chance to not stink.

The article is talking about SNAP and soda, right? That's what I wrote on.

It's because he's the typical Democrat. He knows it's a problem but he doesn't care because it doesn't affect. In the future, when it becomes a national public health concern, he'll use these people to champion as victims and blame the Republicans for it. This way, his party can pander to them while sitting on their faux pillar of moral superiority... ignoring the fact the fact that they were wrong in the first place. Dude, Democrats STILL, to this day, don't take the blame for slavery or the KKK... they claim that the parties switched.

Correct, I don't care what the article says. Here's what I know is fact. Soda (diet or non, just like other extra sugary drinks), like alcohol and tobacco, are not good for you. Here's another fact that I know... unhealthy eating/drinking, leads to higher rates of unhealthy bodies. Here's another fact that I know... people who are getting income from the government about 80% of them getting healthcare from the government. Did the article dispute or contradict any of those facts? Willing to bet it's "no". So, knowing all of those facts, it's common sense to me that like alcohol and tobacco products, drinks like soda (even diet), just like other artificially sweetened drinks, should should be restricted from any government assistance purchasing outlets. Why? Because tax payers are helping them survive AND supporting their health. Why should we be supporting them to be unhealthy and then pay for them to get (more expensive), medical help? Also, I've heard from other people many times over that people on SNAP are not just buying Coke or Pepsi, but a lot are buying DIET Coke or DIET Pepsi, which isn't as bad. Well, a punch in the face isn't as bad as broken leg, but they both hurt. Same applies here. Artificial sweeteners and alike, that are found in diet sodas are linked to other health conditions such as high blood pressure, liver disease, and kidney disease. All of those require extra medical costs. If these people want to drink soda, let them... they just have to use their own money. These people are free to live and make any unhealthy choices they want... we as a country don't have to give them the money do it. That's my stance. I don't care what ANY politician says. I don't care what any influencer says. I'm willing to bet that they article (from an accused right-leaning outlet), has to say on the matter when I know for a fact, that they won't dispute or disprove any fact I said earlier.

That's right, it's because I'm smarter than you. You should just shut up, sit down, and learn from what I type.

Just like you King of Irony.

Personality-wise... he may be a horrible fit, but not on the field. The Steelers want someone who makes good/safe/correct decisions. Rodgers' whole career... even "the bad ones", consist of good/safe/correct decisions.

That's fine, and I don't trust influencers any more than I trust politicians.

It's actually based in fact, but go on with your little leftist echo chamber.

I don't care about what the article says, I just have beliefs. If a person is on government assistance, then the government should have a say in how you spend the money you are given. It's an encouragement to get off of it. Also, healthcare is an issue in the sense that we're spending too much on it. The reason for that is unhealthy lifestyles and not the insurance or healthcare industry itself. So, if the government is supplying you with assistance, not only in daily living but in healthcare as well, they should have every right to restrict your spending to be healthy. Sadly, because we have dbags in government, there will always be someone who'll change the restrictions when they need to pander for votes.

The irony of a leftist calling someone's response stupid. I don't have to own anything that isn't mine to own... but, if you want to go to the actual origin on cancel culture, you'll be the one owning it. It started in liberal Hollywood in the early 90's. It was popular in the black community. Let me guess... the party's and races switched since then?

Your premise is false. You're assuming it was only righties who did that. Where I live, NJ, a very liberal state... there were less righties against them than lefties.

The Steelers want a QB who at worst, won't screw things up. That's NOT Jameis Winston.

Just more evidence that the Democrat party (leadership), is all about STILL, using black people to further their own wealth while keeping the black community down.