TBayXXXVII

How long until we hear 2008 all over again... "Anyone who disagrees with Harris, does so only because they're racist"? Or has that started already?

You know what, I forgot Cooks was still there. I thought he went somewhere else when FA started. Yeah, 200 seems like a stretch now. LOL

I'd choose Lamb in that group because he's the only guy commanding targets. I think he could hit 200 targets this year... unless he signs a new deal.

Injuries are always a concern for everyone. Sure, some may be more expected, but I tend to not care unless it happens every year. McCaffrey played every game his first 3 seasons. The first time he got hurt, was the COVID year, where there was not training camp. As with a lot of star players, I think they're rushed back sooner than they should, he missed a lot of games the following year. Well, the next two, he played every game... the only game he missed last year was Week 18, where they punted. So, in 7 seasons, McCaffrey only missed games in 2 of them. In 2018, he had 328 touches and over 400 the following season. In 2022, he had over 320 touches and over 320 last year. He's shown that he can stay healthy and have consecutive workload seasons. So, he's not, and never has been a durability concern. If I'm on the clock and am taking a RB, I'm taking McCaffrey over everyone else and it's not even a debate. I like Robinson's potential in ATL and I think Allgeier being there is a good thing. It prevents Robinson from being over used. Last year, the Falcons were 3rd in the NFL in rush attempts behind only Baltimore and Chicago, both who've used their QB as RB's. I do expect them to be more efficient this year and expect them to throw more than last year, but I think they'll run more plays because they'll have longer drives, so I don't anticipate a big drop in overall rush attempts. I'm not worried about Hall's TD's because they had trash running the offense the last two seasons and the team didn't score TD's at all. I mean, I think his 9 TD total is very promising, considering that the team only scored 18 (on offense). I like the idea of my RB scoring half of his teams total TD's. Gibbs to me would be a great flex option/RB2 because I think he is a boom/bust kind of guy. He played 15 games and had 6 games where he failed to score double digits and 2 more where he was less than 13. Last year, 23 RB's averaged at least 13 fpg. I like Barkley a lot. I think his presence should scare Hurts owners and not the other way around. Kelce being gone is going to limit the number of TD's that Hurts gets and I believe Barkley will be the beneficiary. I think Barkley could end up with 15+ total TD's this season. He is someone who I would be concerned about with durability issues. I think there should be some durability concerns with Taylor, but based on the build of this team and their offseason moves, he's going to get the ball a lot. They let Moss walk and they really don't have anyone else to give the ball to that is a concern. I wouldn't say he's not a threat to catch the ball. He's averaging about 3 targets and 2.3 receptions a game. I think 40 receptions is a nice number. Me, I'm going with McCaffrey every day over everyone else. I'd rank this group as McCaffrey Hall Barkely Robinson Gibbs Taylor

LOL, he offered, I just took it. Honestly, I didn't even read the whole offer. In that league, I make all kinds of draft trades to see what can happen. I think a lot of people in the league do the same. Kind of like a "what do I need to offer"/"what can I get away with", type thing for people to use as a base in their big money leagues. I may kind of screw other people up though.... I just take offers without really reading them. It's the offers that I make and deals I initiate, are the ones I care about.

In my medium-competitive 10-team office league, I had the #1 pick and traded it to the guy with the #7 pick. Other than flipping firsts, I got his 2nd, 3rd, & 5th, he got my 6th, 7th, and 8th.

He probably knows Trump's going to win. He can stay Commie though. We don't want that kind associated with us.

You replied to me initially, did you not? Thanks for playing.

I'll take this as you saying: "Ok, I was just looking for a reason to argue, can't find one, so I'll move on".

I didn't say the lead it, I said they supported it. You don't remember Harris and others saying that they'd donate money to gofundme's for people to use as bail money if they got arrested? Short term memory, eh? I never said the GOP wouldn't side with him... I said they would. My point was that the Leftists in the media and DC have been telling people for years that the GOP would love to have a reason to get rid of Trump. I said they were lying. You seem to agree but don't want to say it. After Trump wins, he has no leverage with the GOP anymore as he can no longer run again. If the GOP really wanted to get rid of him, all they have to do is have a few Leftist activists concoct a reason to impeach him, like they did twice last time, and it will only take a couple people on the right to get rid of him. It actually will be pretty easy. Proving how delusional you are, I don't like Trump, he's an azzhat, but I like his policies. If the GOP did 25th him, I wouldn't care too much. In 2024, the worst people in the world, are involved in the DNC.

What's delusional is that you think the conservative populous is as demented as the liberal populous. The conservative voters do not think that the handful of moron's was as big of an issue as the wacko's on your side of the aisle. We all know and believe that the summer of 2020 was way worse and the liberals didn't just condone the activities, they supported it. True or false, if Harris is picked to run on the Democrat side and she literally shoots Trump in the face, she gets more votes than Obama in 2008? When you answer True, you can stop with the "it wouldn't matter" crap.

That's no where near the mother of examples, lol... that's a copout b.s. example. Trump lost the election at that point and the public thought everything about the election was crap. The GOP knew that they had no chance to stop Trump's popularity, and why they didn't even try hard in the primaries to back Haley, because they knew she had no shot. BUT, after Trump wins the election, that's all over. The GOP has every incentive to help him win and then would have every incentive to get rid of him. The left would have the greatest ally in an impeachment process, the GOP, if they truly wanted him out. Trump can't run again, the GOP can have Vance in the White House, and no more Trump. Right? Sure, some would say that's political suicide, but let's be honest... all it will take is like a handful of Republicans who would be on their way out anyway, to side with the Communist party and boom, Trump is gone. Those handful of Republican's would lose their re-election bids and go work for CNN or MSNBC and trash the GOP, the GOP would save face with the rest of the constituency and we move on.

Let's just remember that 4 years ago, we were told that Biden would've just accepted the loss to Trump and went on his merry way. Well, everyone wants Biden out and he's not going quietly.

Ok, so the left has been lying the whole time that the GOP would love to have a reason to get rid of Trump?

Oh, I know they will... the leftist rhetoric for the last 9 years has been that the GOP would do anything to get rid of Trump. Well, if they had a chance to do it, and didn't... that would mean that the left has been lying the whole time about the GOP, right? I mean, they'd have a great chance to get rid of him and if they truly like Vance, there's no reason why they wouldn't 25th him and insert Vance. That was my point.

IF that happens... do you really think the GOP will cover for Trump like the DNC did for Biden? Liberals all over the place, the media, in DC, and even on this board have said that the Republican establishment doesn't like Trump. Were they lying about that before/about it now? Note: No, he's not rapidly approaching that, that's your wishful thinking.

This is a lie. Every single post by liberals is racist because the starting point of their entire point is that black people can't do things because they're black... they just disguise it under pandering.

Of course you can call out racism when you see it. It's just your fault that your meter changes on what is and isn't racism, based on who's saying it. You tend to give a conservative an inch and a liberal a mile. Honestly, I'm fine with that... it's what your kind does and I'm used to it. It's all good.

That should concern you because we've known this for years... not weeks.

Exactly

I wouldn't doubt it.

Money is irrelevant. They have more than enough for their age. What they would want is assurance that Hunter doesn't go to jail.

1) Ok, my bad, sorry 2) When you say racism, with your M.O., it's political.

Pretty sure I wasn't the first, just clarifying the problem. Once someone brings up racism (I believe it was you), we now have a political thread.

Boy how I wish that were true. Well, seafoam is, I'll give you that one.