TBayXXXVII

Him and Rusty have been the 2 worst for years.

I can see a scenario where the Titans trade down. If you're Tennessee, do you take Vegas' #1 and #2 this year and next year for #1 overall? Ward and Sanders may be the top 2, but what if the Titans like someone else (say McCord), just as much. Take him at #6 and add pick #37 and a potentially top 10 pick next year. Still, in this scenario, you're right that the Sanders and Ward are gone by pick #3... just might not be the two teams we expect.

Even in a league where passing is made easier, a good pass rush will trump a great QB.

Of course you didn't... I'm just smart enough to know that's what you'll do. I was born on a day... but it wasn't yesterday.

The Democrats have billions of dollars going to "fund" left wing ideologies abroad. We know this, do we not? All of that money is solely for the purpose to launder it back into the Democrat coffers to pay back for their financial and verbal support. The Clinton's, Obama, Biden, Harris, all of them... all got money to use to pay those people back. Trump spent 4 years raising money for this past election, even used his OWN money, and got what... $400M? Harris ran for 4 month's and got $1.5B? You think the people donating that kind of money were doing it because they actually thought that piece of trash was a good presidential candidate? Of course they didn't, but they did know they were getting the money back. Programs like USAID are just one of the sources.

LOL, trampling established law. All they're doing is bringing it out into the light. Trump has the ability to pause the funding, which is what he's doing. The media and communist party are telling you that he's actually stopped the funding. No, you're reading that wrong. Republican's wouldn't be opposed to it, they know the Democrats wouldn't do it because they're the bigger problem of the two. The Democrats DO NOT want this door opened. It's why they have people like you believing that Trump is breaking the law.

I don't trust the original source that the OP provided. Based on the content of that account, it looks like it's a Democrat just trying to stoke the flames of conservatives to do exactly what the OP did. I have NO DOUBT that the Clinton's got money from USAID that ended up being used for personal use. Willing to bet it's 7 figures. I don't think however Chelsea got $84M. The person whom you are championing, @Mike Honcho is doing exactly what the intent of that initial tweet was. He's saying you're an idiot for believing Chelsea got $84M and then using that as motivation to poo poo anything involving Democrats being corrupt or fraudulent. Go check out the second post of this very page. I gave an example of government fraud/corruption. I know those on your side of the aisle will either dismiss it, excuse it... or be short, and say "Well, he was wrong and shouldn't have done that".

I agree with you. Trump and Musk are cracking down on government subsidizing that kind of act. The left are trying to use the court system to stop it. Just wanted to see where you stood. I expect that in threads about the USAID and alike, you'll be in there cheering Trump and Musk along.

The point is, anyone that anybody brings on to look into wasteful spending is going to be someone they have ties to. Let's say that Harris won this past election and she wanted to look into this. Who do you think she'd bring in? It would be a DNC donor. There's a 0.0% chance that anyone in the White House wouldn't bring in someone they or the party is comfortable with. That person will be a political donor... guaranteed. So, that's why I said, "you mean someone on your side". You're ok with a Democrat president doing what Trump is doing and you'll acquiesce to whomever they choose to do what Musk is doing.

Yup, moving in the right direction.

That's actually pretty funny.

I believe that was coal miners he said that to.

Sure it's not.

Ok, so you don't want to answer the question. I mean, it was a "yes" or "no" question.

So no then. Got it. Why didn't you just say that you want your side to do it? At least you'd be honest.

Well, then I'm sure you have a list of names to share, right?

You mean like when a VP openly admits to a quid quo pro (which was proven to have happened), on national tv (which gets ignored), using government money to protect his son?

So a far leftist politician then?

Who said anything about research? It was a simple question. I'm asking if you'd have a problem with the government funding your so called "Some conservative dark money non-profit propaganda outfit", to make these ad campaigns against the Cleveland Clinic.

Nope, not confused at all. I'm simply asking if you'd have a problem with the government funding your so called "Some conservative dark money non-profit propaganda outfit", to make these ad campaigns against the Cleveland Clinic.

This thread is a perfect example of how 90% of the country agrees with Trump on this issue while the other 10% don't. While that is the case, the left side of the aisle will champion the cause of the 10% because they don't like the person leading the 90%. But when the left side of the aisle gets back into power, they'll eliminate men playing women's sports and take credit for it.

For our board leftists... to be clear, you're saying that if the federal government funneled tax dollars into "Some conservative dark money non-profit propaganda outfit", who's job it was to target organizations like the Cleveland Clinic in this fashion, you wouldn't want Trump and DOGE to shut it down?

Winner!

No, he blocks me because I prove how stupid he is all the time. He doesn't like that.

Yeah, that would be funny.