TBayXXXVII

You can literally say that about every single politician, past, present, and future. I know, I know, TrUmP dOeS iT mOrE!!!

For dynasty, the investment was already made, so the production is what it is. I'd expect similar to last year. In the end, the numbers will look good, but how he gets there could be frustrating. He'll probably have a few big games (which won't be monster games... meaning, mid-high 20's, just nothing in the 30's or 40's), but games where he produces like a WR2 or 3. He's not a Chase or Jefferson, but he's still probably a mid-tier WR1. If they get a real QB in there, then he might put up high end WR1 numbers. That said, if they bring in another WR, that has the ability to catch the ball, unlike the rest of their roster last year, that could prove to be detrimental. For example, lets say the draft a QB at #3 overall, but see their #1 WR on the board at #34. They may take that WR and give their QB a good foundation of weapons. Despite missing 2 games, Nabers still had 170 targets. A rookie QB and 2nd viable receiving option may result in Nabers getting only 150 targets. Still WR1 territory, but maybe more low-end at that point.

Without listening to it, it's probably pretty bad.

Evidence of "mentally ill".

Well duh, that goes without saying.

This.

From the article.... "Three Democratic sources close to the budget negotiations who spoke on the condition they remain anonymous told KCRA 3 that while Newsom's administration has said the healthcare for undocumented people is not the sole reason for the cost increases, they want more specifics from the Newsom administration." In other words, these 3 Democrats know that Newsom is full of crap and don't want to go on record defending him because they know that the truth will eventually come out and they don't want to look like fools. Especially since Newsom is done as Governor and those people hope to get re-elected.

You should ALWAYS look for ways to lose weight in a healthy, metered, productive way. If you eat healthy (and no, not just vegetables), but have the proper diet of quality protein, carbs, and fats, while exercising, you WILL lose weight AND add muscle. Both of those are the ideal outcomes you want. If you are very heavy and do stuff like medication or crash diets and what not, odds are the act isn't going to stick. There WILL be side affects that make you quit. The rebound will be worse than your starting point. A healthier lifestyle WILL make you feel better and keeping up with that process WILL be desired. The added perk is your appearance in the form of skin. When you lose large amounts of weight in short period of time, your skin doesn't tighten. You get saggy skin. If you do it slowly, your body adjusts and tightens. Other perks are a healthier body, lower medicals bills, no chemical dependency, and no other chemicals will need to be added to counterman side affects. You want better national healthcare, have everyone take care of their bodies and be prudent in diet and exercise. Watch how fast everyone's and the nations medical costs plummet.

You should never take chemicals for what normal habits could accomplish.

I always think there's wrong doing when the government is handing out money for special interest groups.

Apparently Greenland's election swung towards independence from Denmark. I don't think it'll ever become a US territory or state, but I do believe this would make it a lot easier for us to deal with Greenland by not needing to deal with Denmark. My inclination is that this would be best for both the US, Trump, Republicans and Greenland, not so much for Denmark and Communists Democrats, sorry, Freudian slip.

Sounds good to me. Let's see where the money is going and why.

I think the issue was in reference to a new stadium. I believe insurance is fixing the old one, so I don't think there's any money out of pocket on that front for the team or the city.

In reading the whole article, it matches what I heard on the radio. There's rumblings about that indicate the Rays ownership might be selling the team. It's my guess that the current ownership doesn't want to spend any more money than they have to before they sell the team.

That's true. Biden was better than Obama. Fortunately we have Trump now.

That should be concerning. I know it is to me.

I haven't seen a mock have McMillan drafted in the Top 5, so he's probably going to be there. That said, they don't have to take a WR in round 1. From what I've been reading, Emeka Egbuka could fall to the late 20's, Matthew Golden & Tre Harris are likely to fall into the 2nd round. A trade up to get Egbuka or sit at 36 and wait for Golden or Harris would work fine too, if the Jags like them. I've read like 7 or 8 different guys that could go between 20 and 40, so any of them, that the Jags like, would be the direction I think they should go in.

If they're smart, they keep Strange and spend a pick on a WR. Their second best WR wouldn't be a #4 on almost any other roster.

That I completely agree with.

Cut federal funding.

I don't disagree with this.

States rights. I believe in letting state regulate their own constituency. The thing is, they'll have to forfeit any and all federal money. The United States has a boundary to protect. If a state wishes to go against that, then they pay a price. That price is no federal funding, for anything, at all. Money is fungible. So, there's no way to regulate and ensure that federal money isn't being used to help illegal immigrants, so the only way to protect the federal boundary and money, is that these states are 100% financially independent. If the residents of that state are ok with it, so am I. If people don't like it, then they vote to change the laws... or move to a state that better supports their beliefs. I do think a wrinkle that would need to be addressed is sanctuary cities that are not in sanctuary states. My inclination is that the state allows it, but withholds any and all state funding. That city must be 100% financially independent. That said, as @Hardcore troubadour pointed out, this isn't a States Rights issue. I'm just willing to meet them in the middle.

The problem is, not every sanctuary city is in a sanctuary state. I'm fine with sanctuary cities and states, with my previous posts conditions.

I'm fine with sanctuary cities as long as those cities never get federal funding and those people NEVER leave the city. If they leave and go to another sanctuary city, then I'm ok with that too. If they go to a non-sanctuary city, then they can be deported with no issue. If it's a sanctuary state, I'm ok with this under the same premise.

Kupp isn't a bad option, but I'd target Keenan Allen before Cooper. Could probably sign either Kupp and Allen for $10M AAV. Probably not bad if they plan on addressing the position early on in the draft. I'm reading that solid WR's could fall to the late first round (possible trade up), or down to the second.