TBayXXXVII

She misspent $2.7T in tax payer money. Probably best she just not go down that path.

The right response to this would have been to laugh at her. Then when she asks why, he says, "I just think it's funny that you sit there with an air of superiority questioning me about $14M when you've misplaced or overspent almost $3T in the last 20 years".

LOL, what an idiot. I didn't tell you what to think... YOU SAID what YOU THINK. "I only said that to him because he's been doing the same schtick recently." I just pointed out the facts. You're free to ignore or accept them as you wish. Well, I will thank you for thinking I was smart... I never thought you were.

She was cute.

The point still remains and you know it's true. It's why you're trying to down play it as a joke.

Oh, I'm sure she was spoken to, but not the way she should have. She was probably just told to not say that in public and probably told how to do damage control, but that's it.

Well, at least we now know what the impeachment proceedings this term will be about.

Yeah, it's only ok for the left to do that up until the election. After the divisiveness served it's purpose, it shouldn't be done anymore.

He's the main reason I didn't take Justin Jefferson in my playoff fantasy league. Figured they'd be a 1 and done and a bad one at that.

Agree completely.

I completely agree that a QB/HC/OC match makes all the difference in the world. I just think that it's easier if the coach and HC find the right QB for their system than trying to figure out what kind of HC/OC you need to hire to fit the QB. It's why I said the Jags screwed up with the extension... they went with the second option not the first. He's the next Alex Smith.

Senior moment.

Well, that's a fair point. We do actually have a statistical range that proves the number is between 75M and 82M.

It's funny you say that when the racial wealth gap in NYC & CA are the 2 biggest in the country.

You understand that the teams that stinks, still add similar funds to the pot as those who don't, right?

Your answer proves otherwise.

Yeah, most likely.

I find it interesting that as a Democrat, that you have think a problem with Trump entering office as a convicted felon, but you don't have a problem that he was a convicted despite his rights being violated.

...and you DEI hire still couldn't beat him.

I know you're that naïve to believe that crap, but do you think the rest of the country is too? Yeah, sadly, so do I. After all, 81M "people" did vote for Biden, so we know there's at least 81M.

This was a kangaroo court that the mayor bilked the city out of a couple million dollars. I see no reason why Trump needs to force anyone else to pay for that bull crap.

What does it matter if she was a DEI Mayor or not? I thought DEI is supposed to be a good thing? If it is, then why are you questioning it and not championing it?

I'm very confident that I don't want to know if I'd win or lose that bet.

So... Trump was found guilty of election interference by a mayor who created a crime in effort to interfere with an election?

Who's dumber.... this woman who doesn't get the point you're making or the people believing the climate activists (who fly around on private jets all year every year)?