TBayXXXVII

I thought this as well, but it was lowered to .10 in the 80's and then to .08 in the 90's. There's a 50/50 chance that when he got busted, it was .08. https://www.brockhunterlaw.com/blog/2014/november/the-history-of-dui-laws-in-america/#:~:text=DUI Laws in the 1970s&text=15 to .,08 BAC. That said, a lot of people have been busted ONCE for DUI. It happens and was a bad mistake and the ones who only did once, learned and never did it again. I have no problem brushing this aside if it's a one-time incident.

That sucks. A long time ago... 20+ years, so it was no where near as bad as today, but some friends of mine and I were flying from Philly to Miami (November), on a Thursday morning. The flight was at 6:30 AM. We got there at 4, and almost missed the flight because airport security had 1 lane open for an entire terminal.

I'm starting to think that both Tim's are the same person.

LOL, I'm not like some here who pin threads or link them all over the place like others. He said MAGA was violent and gave me a link of 54 incidents over a 4 year period and "proof" that he was right. ETA: Again, I forget which thread, but he said he believed Smollette's story because MAGA was violent. He then shared a link where the title said something about 54 cases connecting the acts of violence to Trump's rhetoric. Note, that was over a 4 year period.

Here's the question, did they get beat because they were too far left... or not left enough? I didn't follow either race, so I'm not sure who the person was that beat them.

I think it was the dude in NY... Bowman? Didn't know Bush lost.

I believe I read one of the other Squad members lost in the primary. Forget which one. Not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing.

That would be a good trick anywhere in the country.

Says the guy who showed 54 incidents in 4 years of MAGA people being violent and saying that all of MAGA was violent... equating to about 40% of our population. LOL

I wasn't doing that either. My original point was that the Niners are using calf injury as an excuse to keep McCaffrey out or preseason nonsense without catching flack. They did that last year too, in Week 18, in a meaningless game. McCaffrey has never had a calf injury that lead to missing games in his career. Then, @wolves111 said that a calf injury is what derailed Montgomery's season. Montgomery never had a calf injury and then he [wolves111], went on some weird tangent. In 7 seasons, McCaffrey has missed games due to injury in only 2 of them. This "calf injury" doesn't concern me. That's my point.

Week 6 was the week he got hurt and missed the next 2, then had a bye week. His next 4 games were 17.6, 17.8, 15.1, and 12.5. Obviously if a guy is out he's not going to help you, but those last 4 weeks? Averaging 15.75 fpg shouldn't "kill" you. Last year, Mixon was RB11 averaging 15.7 fpg.

David Montgomery? You're sure? His first 2 games were fine, 13+ and 12+, then he got hurt (reported as a thigh bruise). He missed 1 game and had 2 big weeks, then hurt again (reported as a rib bruise), then the rest of the year was fairly consistent with his first 2 games.

They gave up on Pickett sooner. LOL I don't know if they're giving him up or not, but I think the fact that they're trading for someone who's similar to him in the first place tells us that already.

Calf injury was the excuse they used to keep him out of Week 18 last year. It's the only time he's "ever had one". I'm not concerned.

I would think the Steelers would make him a part of the package, because they're essentially the same type of player.

Coaches excuse to limit McCaffrey without catching flack from the media/fans.

There ya go.

I don't know... I kind of think the opposite, in regards to his potential in Cleveland. Now, I say that based on the speculation being accurate. Word was that a deal with the Browns will likely include Cooper going to San Fran. If we look at what Cooper did last year, I think there's a chance he could be better in Cleveland than San Fran. Last year in 15 games, Cooper had 128 targets and finished as WR20 (ppr format). In the 8 games where he had Watson and Flacco (playing the whole game), he scored: 6.7, 16, 24.6, 14.9, & 24.9 (Watson), and 12.7, 20.9, & 51.5 (Flacco). That's 21.5 points per game. Even if you throw out the high and the low extremes, that's still 19 fpg. Last year, both Cooper and Aiyuk had 6 games where they failed to at least 12 points. For Cooper, 5 of those came without Watson and Flacco. Cooper caught only 56.3% of his passes, overall. In games with Watson and Flacco, he caught 65.8%. I think that if Watson can stay healthy (and Cooper goes to San Fran), Aiyuk has a chance to be a top 10 WR. I think his chances of that are better in Cleveland than with the 49ers.

Just my take, I don't care what any Depth Chart says... I know that Clyde Edwards-Helaire stinks. If I want to take a Pacheco handcuff, I'll take Prince.

Heard on the Fantasy Sports channel (Sirius/XM), that the Steelers were one of the first teams that the 9ers gave permission to, to talk to Aiyuk's agent about a new deal and they said "no thanks". I'm thinking that's what New England did too. The word is that Aiyuk was looking for Justin Jefferson money... and I don't think many teams think he's worth that.

LOL, yeah, THIS is THE example.

LOL Yeah, we're the one's who moved.

Really? Why? With every election, the Democrats move further and further left.

LOL