TBayXXXVII

@nobody was NOT who I was talking about... it was the far leftist branch that I was referring to because they constantly post their ignorance and you can never tell when they're being ignorant or making a joke.

Good thing the Communist has his priorities straight.... And Democratic U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan replied to a message from U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden on X, saying in part: "Support better gun laws or stay out. Thought & prayers are useless. Action!"

Ah, the old "I disagree with religion so I'm going to take it 100% literal and purposefully ignore the point" approach. I'm not even religious, but I'm not ignorant like some of our leftist/atheist brethren.

It's an excuse to be a heathen. It's what keeps AIDS and HIV around. Good thing we have Big Pharma, amirite?

Be careful, if you call him dumb, he's put you on ignore. He doesn't like those kinds of facts.

I agree. If you're taking someone's account for things, sure, I can see the source mattering, but when you have an unedited video I don't see how you can question it. If the tag line is "A lot of black people are calling the mayor a negro" and just show 1 instance, then I can see the hesitation. That's not the case here. They said "A woman", then showed the video. I've seen abbreviated clips of this meeting and saw a lot of black people calling out the mayor's policies on the illegal immigrants, so I know a lot of them are angry. Now, I don't know the full extent, but I do know there's a lot of people unhappy.

Link from CNN (so libtards can't complain about the source): A nice 4 hour video so they can see how many there were, for themselves.

Yeah, lol, this is the evidence.

You could be right. Will definitely be interesting to see how it pans out.

From the article... If I recall, many people on this board who are on the left and the right, seem to be in agreement that they should stay away from kids. Of course, the far leftists of the crowd are fine with that, but I believe that is the minority. Correct me if I'm wrong. With that being said, Adam Smith's last statement implies that this is a far-right stance. If that's what he thinks, I think we can all agree that he is a far leftist.

That's not good. Generally this is a sign of osteoporosis.

What goal posts? You said good like finding him [Fauci] guilty. I just pointed out in NY that Trump was convicted of 34 felony's, but we don't even know what those felony's are. Apparently in NY, you can just find someone guilty of a crime as long as you think they're guilty of "something".

They should probably try him in NY. I hear that in their trials, you don't actually need proof of something illegal, you just need jurors to think that he's guilty of "something" and they don't all have to agree on what that "something" is.

I don't know... I seem to think this might be a perfect job for Belichick. He calls ALL the shots, money isn't an issue, and he has no one telling him who he can and can not recruit. I think he might do really well there.

Based on that, it looks like a local NY radio station that will simulcast ESPN when they don't have anyone or anything, going on locally. That's probably why you never hear any Trump stuff... unless they're saying something bad about him. Of course, it's up to the stations to sell ad time and it's possible that Trump isn't wasting money in buying up that ad time in a demographic that wouldn't be favorable. So it might be Trump's doing and not the radio stations.

Oh, my bad. I thought his premise was talking about the summer of 2020.

She and I both employ the same tactics. We listen to each other throughout the year and make mental notes and surprise each other by showing that we listened all year. I'll say, "Why's it so cold in here", "How come the grass isn't cut", or "Why's it so hot in here", and I've been know to say "How come the remote doesn't work" She'll buy me sweatshirts, a lawn mower, a ceiling fan, or batteries. She'll say, "What aren't the dishes washed", "How come the floors are a mess", and "Why are the clothes still in the basket in the laundry room". So I'll buy her a new dishwasher, vacuum cleaner, and clothes washer.

My guess is that you're listening to a local NY channel that is simulcasting the ESPN feed, and not a radio station that is actually owned by ESPN.

I think this is debatable, unless you include the fact that did it while dealing with racists and angry lesbians. If so, then I agree with you.

People rioting in the streets and destroying public property aren't "innocent people in the first place".

I'm merely saying that colleges, publishers, special interest groups, and corporations are paying big money to politicians and former presidents for making appearances and making bank on it for very little effort. I see that as no different than Trump trying to sell watches, cologne, or any other kind of thing. I'm not making any claims that they're stealing tax money, just putting it out there that I don't understand the rationale to be willing to give your money to things like that. My guess is that in large part that it's to put money into the pockets of the politicians as grift for getting things done at the government level, that help these groups make (or save), money. Meaning, they're paying off a bribe so to speak. For example, Bill Clinton passes a bill into law (The Telecommunications Act), that allows big corporations to buy little corporations in the media industry giving more control of information to corporations (weird that it's supposed to be Republican's who do that). To thank Clinton for that, these major media outlets pay Bill $100k here, $100k there, and alike, to come speak at events for like 30 minutes. Things like that.

I was just saying that I hear it all the time, that's all. Not making any judgements or anything like that.

They all are. I'm sure it happened when I was younger, but Bill Clinton with all these "speaking engagements", the Bush's, Obama, it's all the same. They're all millionaires because people pay them for crap. Why? Makes no sense. They also write books too, even Bernie. All people are doing is giving egotists money, because they're suckers.

He's discounting the fact that the police were handcuffed by their bosses in what they were able to do.

What happens when the police aren't doing their jobs in these situations?