TBayXXXVII

Ok, then why the question? Weren't we talking about deporting convicted criminals?

Like I said, you're constantly calling out Republican's for doing things that Democrats are currently doing, hence the nickname. It wouldn't be so bad if you were doing it from a pedestal of superiority, but here we are. What would you like to know about my opinion of January 6th? That Trump gave a heads up to the Capitol Police and to make sure they kept everyone in check? That when he said to send in the National Guard, Pelosi said "No"?

Certainly. Do you want the food you're about to eat, be prepared by convicted criminals? I certainly don't.

You are King Irony. Virtually every post of yours is calling out Republicans of doing things the Democrats are doing and/or have done. Your posts are pretty entertaining.

Are they convicted criminals

If we eliminated sanctuary cities and states and didn't have an open border policy, this issue would be negligible.

LOL, King Irony has an opinion.

The criminals should be Phase 1 and the one should/must be carried out. Even though common sense says that everyone should be in favor of this, we know for a fact that there have been local elected officials protecting these people in terms of, letting them back out into society. If they had just turned them over, then I think there'd be a lot less of an issue. The government always screws things up... even perfectly laid out plans (even though, if the government is coming up with those plans, they aren't perfect), but that should prevent them from actually trying to their job. Heck, they screw things up that are legal.

People crossing into the US are committing a crime. The federal government has the legal right to deport them. If there are elected officials preventing the federal government from doing their job, that could be seen as treason. I'm ok with that. I'm ok with using the federal government to use the military (if necessary, generally just an FBI agent doing this... but leftists are pretty intolerant and hateful), to arrest such government officials. Now, I'm a very reasonable person. I'm willing to be rather lenient. If said elected official committing treason were willing to say "Yeah, sorry, I was wrong. I'll help you carry out the rule of law.", then this person can be allowed to do their job and go back to the position they held. Now, if they want to be a belligerent leftist scumbag, again, I'm still willing to be lenient. I'd allow them to choose their penalty for committing treason. How many governments would allow that? See, I'm a nice guy. They can either chose to forfeit their citizenship and be exiled from the US forever. OR, they can choose the death penalty. I think giving these people 2 chances to help themselves for committing treason way more than fair.

We already have agencies like ICE who will do the rounding up... that is part of their job after all. My guess is the use of the military would be to carry out the deportations since there'll be a lot of people. Also, it might be necessary when liberal governments want to commit treason.

Did he say that he was going to use the military to round up the people or use them to carry out the deportation?

No, they got her 2 weeks ago.

Because she lost, I don't care how the money was spent. I think the fact alone, that she spent $1B should be a sign to everyone that she had no problem spending other people's money. It also should show everyone that when you raise that much money, the vast majority of it is coming from high wealth donors. The obvious conclusion to draw from that is that they were going to be paid back through wasteful tax dollar spending.

To be fair, he only played 2 home games in 2023.

Exactly. Plus, the MSM won't mention it because they don't want the "average voter" to know that Trump and the Republican's are doing exactly what the Democrats have been saying they don't do. It would be showing the DNC and the MSM as liars. Can't have that now. Don't want the truth coming out. That's why they want to be the arbiters of "misinformation".

That's because she's not a DEI hire where the Left needs to pander.

I think there will be some liberal outlets that take this approach. They know that they screwed the pooch this election and want to come across as more neutral to the independent voter that they turned away. I'd expect this move to last 4 years.

Certainly reasonable.

Sure, but that's because he had the time. A media outlet as big as MSNBC (or even Comcast - if he bought the whole thing), would take a lot more hands on work... I would think. He really would only have like what, 2 months? Doesn't seem like enough time. Maybe I'm wrong.

Aren't they even the ones that like to post those "Media Bias" charts all the time to show us that Fox News is far right? Those same charts show MSNBC as far left.

This is why I don't think he would do it. Because it's too time consuming, he couldn't just jump in and do what needs to be done. As you said, he'd have to hand it off and would have to be disconnected, which I don't think that would be how he wants things.

I don't think he really has any interest in buying a media outlet. It would be too time consuming.

In your world, I have no doubt you think that.

You don't think his bow tie's would turn her on though?

I wouldn't be surprised. The majority of the Democrat party is on the extreme left.