TBayXXXVII

Yeah, QB's would be the only position where a lot of points could be adjusted. Other than that, it's like 1 point because they changed a reception to a rush or vice versa for any other position. I guess a sack could be credited mistakenly for a tackle (or vice versa). Depending on your league scoring, that could be 1 or 2 points... maybe more if you use IDP's and the wrong guy was credited. Also, that ball was behind the line, so it should've been a run. They got that right.

Correction.... my bad. I meant Punters. Don't know what I was thinking with Kickers. In your league, Shaheed got the TD and so did the New Orleans Defense and Special teams (to note, I'm using ESPN and Shaheed did not get a TD for the punt return [nor is it an option in our settings]), is that the same for a Punter? Does the punter and the special teams get credit for a TD on a fake punt?

What website do you use?

Find me ONE league where a kicker has EVER gotten credit for a TD. Willing to bet neither of yours do. I've played in a bunch of leagues that used different websites and I've never seen that happen. Though, I haven't played on any site in the last 10 years, other than ESPN or Yahoo... to this day, neither give credit to a kicker for a TD.

Ok, let's put your system to the test. Tyler Bass is about to kick a FG. The snap comes and it's fumbled by the holder. Bass picks the ball up and runs it in for a TD. Who gets the points?

When is a "WR" on the field? True or False: It's when the "offense" is on the field.

I think what you put is the exact opposite of sportsmanship. Herm Edwards said it perfectly, "You play to win the game". If changing your lineup to ensure your lead and guarantee your win, that's playing to win the game, which is the objective in fantasy football... score the most points. Purposefully starting a player who's either out or on a bye because you don't want to drop someone is douchey because you're playing a man (or two), down on purpose and willing to accept a loss. That's a lack of integrity to the league. You're willing to hand over a win to someone at the expense of other teams. THAT's unsportsmanlike.

It is, if you ignore the purpose of special teams to make your argument.

I explained the answer to both of your questions in my post. When teams run the trick play, who's on the field? The offense right... not the special teams? When Taysom Hill lines up at RB or QB, he's doing that while on offense, right? Or is he doing that on special teams. If your league is set up that way fine. It's your league and you can set it up however you like, but like I said, it's to appease the crybabies.

What do you think his value is? What would you expect in return?

I think it makes no sense to give a wide receiver points when he's on the field in another role. When a player is on the punt or kick return team, he's on the field as a special teams player... hence, anything he gets, is as a special teamer. If you draft a "Wide Receiver", he's not a "Wide Receiver" when he's fielding kicks or punts. Making a rule for this is simply catering to crybabies. The fallacy here is that 1 person can get points twice, for the same score. That makes no sense. Either the special teams gets the points or the return man gets the points.

Outside of a QB being given or not given a TD because there may have been a mistake with a pass or handoff on these dump off's/pitches, I don't imagine anything being fixed much more than a point, from a RB/WR/TE perspective. Meaning, a reception being given or taken away (as in the scenario I just noted). Basically, if it's a RB/WR/TE, I can see really only 1 point. For a QB, could be 7+.

Then I'd keep them in there. There's a significantly high chance that the Bills defense at worst, gets only 0 points, so I think your win is safe. I'd take every point I can get if total points matter... you never know.

Is there any advantage to total points? If not, I'd bench them.

I think it's obvious that Lawrence is a horrible QB, but I love him... he keeps getting Engram the ball.

Is it funny or sad that the Jags have spent over a decade trying to build a fan base in London, and even the Bears have a bigger gathering today than Jacksonville?

Move on from him... the Jags have, so should you.

Who paid who a lot? Etienne is still under his rookie contract?

LOL, looks like you picked the gun up and shot blanks.

I'll take that as throwing your gun. So weak minded you liberals are.

Just pointing out the liberal mindset... "It's (D)ifferent". All they're (and you), are doing is proving I'm right.

5 years ago, Democrats said there's nothing wrong with this. Why is this different now?

1. I didn't say whether they'd do it or not... he asked ME a question and I answered it for ME. 2. I'm talking about people, not politicians. Who are you talking about? Most politicians vote party line, regardless of their feelings. The Democrat party loves to "tell" you that they're moderate or not extremist or what have you... but virtually every bill they pass (they ALL vote for it), is pushing us further and further left. That's politics. I'm not sure how you can sit there and assign blame to one side and completely ignore that same aspect on the other side and condone their activity. 3. That's because you've been brainwashed. This is a you problem, not a Republican party/Trump problem. What policies by Republican's are there that you are soooo against? 4. Again, this is just you being a brainwashed too. Everyone knew YEARS AGO, not weeks or months, that Biden was gone. The Democrats purposefully waited until it was too late to pull the plug on Biden, so that they can slip Harris in without a vote. If the Democrats pulled the plug on Biden last December and said they were going to hold a primary, then all is well. Here's the thing, the DNC knew that if they did that, Harris wouldn't win. Why did they know that? Because she was one of the first to drop out in 2019. No one liked her. Gotta love her virtue signaling, she announced her candidacy in January of 2019 on MLK Jr Day (lol)... in 1 year, she had no where near enough campaign money, that she dropped out before voting started. California's primary was 1 month away and she wasn't even projected to get any delegates. Her OWN STATE didn't even like her. She's done nothing in the last 4 years to become likeable. Nothing. Her own party knew that... again, that's why they didn't want her to run in a primary, because they knew she would lose. Trump at WORST, is where Biden was 4 or more years ago.

I thought your statement was an "in general statement". Now, if you're specifically talking about weather, then no, I haven't heard anyone on the left say they control the weather... but on the topic of climate change, I believe virtually every Democrat is an extremist because I believe that anyone who thinks we are in a climate "crisis", is an extremist.

He evidently doesn't think "The Squad" are extremists.