TBayXXXVII

1, 8, 9... in that order.

Well, baseball and football are different because everyone fully expects multiple years for the player to really take off. With basketball, the vast majority of great players come out their freshman year, coming off a "solid", not multiple jaw dropping seasons. On top of that, with football, the college players have the same time off. The basketball players have more, and so do baseball, with respect to their pro leagues. Clark just finished her college season 6 weeks ago.

Like 15 to 20% https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/SportsProfitability University of Iowa, in 2022 made a total profit of $37M. The biggest sport was football, at $14M. That $37M ranked 13th in country that year. If you notice, Alabama is 11th overall at $52.6M with football leading the way at only $6M.

Never happen. Ticket prices will increase, merchandise costs will increase, concessions will increase, etc. The biggest losers of money are women's sports. A few years ago, I read an article that said only UConn, Tennessee, Notre Dame, and South Carolina women's programs make money... every other women's team across the board, loses a LOT of money. Title IX will make it virtually impossible for schools to drop programs. Even if they do drop some, the impact will be pennies on the dollar, so it wouldn't be worth the effort.

I don't mean demand literally, I mean it in terms of supply and demand. Because there are only a few conferences worth a dam, the selling price for the Networks to buy the broadcast rights will just go up. So, if the SEC was asking for $50M (example only), per year for 10 years from 2015-2024, instead of the asking price being say, $75M per year from 2025-2034, it'll be $100M. They could only get this at the end of the contract. They obviously can't do it mid-way through.

Neither. We're going to pay for it. They'll raise the cost of ticket prices and demand a higher dollar for broadcasting. In turn, networks will increase the ad prices which trickle down to price increases in the products. Don't you worry, Title IX will be safe and the NCAA will still get their money.

Very few schools are "making millions" off of them. The good ones, causing the viewership, are.

I agree, they do.

The order did say they were authorized to use deadly force, did it not? So he's telling the truth. Thanks. We're good. I wouldn't doubt that the Communist party IS ready to kill him. Don't know why you aren't. Oh... wait, you support them. That might be why......????

Yes.

You mean a free education worth about a quarter of a million dollars wasn't enough?

He didn't say assassinate.... and you have to audacity to say to us: "apparently people are buying it".

I think it's funny how board Communists are always up in arms about Trump's lying... and when he tells the truth, they complain!

I wonder if at any time during her last minutes, she ever thought... "maybe I was wrong."

Listening to the fantasy sports channel a bit lately, and a few shows have said that Corum is the guy to get. They seem to think that Williams doesn't have the body/build to be an every down lead back and point to his multiple injuries in such a short time frame, as evidence of that. They believe Corum has that body/build and is a more talented player... to which they think he could beat him out for the starting job. Or, if the Rams feel that they don't want to make that depth chart switch, Williams get hurt, Corum would play too well in Williams' absence, to reduce his playing time when Williams gets healthy.

I didn't say the author did... nor did you quote me saying that. You even said that I quoted CDub about THE BOARD hating the nuclear family. I said that based on the Libturd website, if people on this board disagree with Butker's take, then they in turn, hate the nuclear family. I think that's pretty obvious.

Makes sense... polls generally skew towards liberal opinion.

I'm with @Strike on this. I'm using a Leftist article as the a factual representation of what happened. It's why I keep asking him (and he's not answering), if they have it wrong.

Based on the Huff Post article of what Butker said, if you people are against him, then yes, you hate the nuclear family. That's a you problem, not a Butker or me problem.

Correct. I used the Huff Post article as the source of what Butker said. Are you saying that Huff Post has it wrong?

I didn't insert an argument. I read the Huff Post article and commented on the issues they had. Now, if that's inserting an argument, fine, then your issue should be with Huff Post article.

I stand corrected. Thanks.

The Democrat platform and feminazi agenda ARE anti-nuclear family. I specially called out abortion with respect to the Catholic Church (corrected by Jerry), being actually Biden, where I agree with him. In parts where I disagree with him, I'm ok with it. I don't need to call him out on it nor do I feel the need to call him names like your side does. I didn't watch or read what Butker said, I just see your side freaking out about it. Generally, when you're freaking out, you're on the wrong side of the issue.

LOL, I just read his post and thought the same thing. He's worse than Tim.

I don't think Tim understands what the word "systemic" means.