Gepetto

https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/brighton-park-migrant-meeting-tensions-escalate Oh yea, great idea. /sarcasm

You can watch any game you want: https://www.thestreameast.to/v2/ If you get a pop up opening another tab, just close that and try to open your game or expand your game again.

accurate list

That's who I was thinking and going to say.

Cadbury egg

That's great. What a great memory. Also that was a great game and win by KU today. I like seeing OU lose.

Getting rid of AR-15s doesn't solve the problem; couldn't get rid of them anyway, several already out there. There are other guns, other weapons, bombs. The problem that needs to be addressed is our society, social structure, people falling through the cracks, recovery help for life circumstances like death of a loved one, loss of job, failing out of school, divorce; can't let those people not be helped. Mental health for all especially those right as they're being affected by mental illness need help.

It's on FS2. I just found it on my big screen TV. Didn't know I had that channel.

OK I have Nebraska on my phone on the Fox Sports App. Huskers stopped Purdue on their opening possession. Purdue had 4th and 11 from Nebraska 35 and went for it and threw it to the endzone. Close but Nebraska had it covered so turnover on downs for Purdue.

Now it's on FS1 but that's supposed to be Nebraska - Purdue that I want to watch. Now I have to find FS2 for Nebraksa. Don't know if I have it.

Just watched Halloween H2O last night. I've seen it before. It's good, not the best. Also watched Halloween 6 which is not good but there's some good killing scenes.

This KU - OU game is scheduled to end at 2:30 but they're only in the 3rd quarter. That's odd. Did it kick off on time?

Exciting ending to Indiana - Penn State. Was tied 24-24 with 2 minutes left, Penn State throws a 57 yard touchdown down the sideline. Indiana gets the ball back after the kickoff. Sack, fumble, safety for a Penn State 9 point lead with 1:33 left. It's over.

Live press conference: https://www.foxnews.com/live-news/lewiston-maine-mass-shooting-october-27

That's because GE is bad and what came when I bought my house. Fridge died and dishwasher stopped but my dad fixed it as it was just hard water build up in the hose. I replaced the GE fridge with LG and no problems after several years. I also bought an LG washing machine and dryer and it's been at least 5 years with no issues.

United States Population 1990: 250 million United States Population today: 331 million

I think it's the start of 3 that shows Halloween tricker treaters from different cities and it shows Omaha, NE, where I was a kid at the time. Showing actual cities makes it seem more realistic and scary. I don't know which one it was but I liked the one the most where it shows Michael Meyers when it began when he was a kid, must be 2007.

This is pretty interesting: https://www.yahoo.com/news/videotaped-confessions-hamas-militants-kidnapped-145756186.html

Just stop. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/allegation-river-sea-palestine-will-be-free https://www.ajc.org/news/watch-from-the-river-to-the-sea-what-does-it-mean https://uk.news.yahoo.com/river-sea-prompts-vienna-ban-164435845.html https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/oct/10/people-supporting-hamas-in-uk-will-be-held-to-account-says-rishi-sunak

Where's age 12 Larry Bird video?

I miss Trump era economy and investments. Those were the days.

https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does-0 What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law. Whether a particular type of search is considered reasonable in the eyes of the law, is determined by balancing two important interests. On one side of the scale is the intrusion on an individual's Fourth Amendment rights. On the other side of the scale are legitimate government interests, such as public safety. The extent to which an individual is protected by the Fourth Amendment depends, in part, on the location of the search or seizure. Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83 (1998). Home Searches and seizures inside a home without a warrant are presumptively unreasonable. Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980). However, there are some exceptions. A warrantless search may be lawful: If an officer is given consent to search; Davis v. United States, 328 U.S. 582 (1946) If the search is incident to a lawful arrest; United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973) If there is probable cause to search and exigent circumstances; Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980) If the items are in plain view; Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463 (1985). A Person When an officer observes unusual conduct which leads him reasonably to conclude that criminal activity may be afoot, the officer may briefly stop the suspicious person and make reasonable inquiries aimed at confirming or dispelling the officer's suspicions. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993) Schools School officials need not obtain a warrant before searching a student who is under their authority; rather, a search of a student need only be reasonable under all the circumstances. New Jersey v. TLO, 469 U.S. 325 (1985) Cars Where there is probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains evidence of a criminal activity, an officer may lawfully search any area of the vehicle in which the evidence might be found. Arizona v. Gant, 129 S. Ct. 1710 (2009), An officer may conduct a traffic stop if he has reasonable suspicion that a traffic violation has occurred or that criminal activity is afoot. Berekmer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984), United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002). An officer may conduct a pat-down of the driver and passengers during a lawful traffic stop; the police need not believe that any occupant of the vehicle is involved in a criminal activity. Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 (2009). The use of a narcotics detection dog to walk around the exterior of a car subject to a valid traffic stop does not require reasonable, explainable suspicion. Illinois v. Cabales, 543 U.S. 405 (2005). Special law enforcement concerns will sometimes justify highway stops without any individualized suspicion. Illinois v. Lidster, 540 U.S. 419 (2004). An officer at an international border may conduct routine stops and searches. United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531 (1985). A state may use highway sobriety checkpoints for the purpose of combating drunk driving. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990). A state may set up highway checkpoints where the stops are brief and seek voluntary cooperation in the investigation of a recent crime that has occurred on that highway. Illinois v. Lidster, 540 U.S. 419 (2004). However, a state may not use a highway checkpoint program whose primary purpose is the discovery and interdiction of illegal narcotics. City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000). DISCLAIMER: These resources are created by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts for educational purposes only. They may not reflect the current state of the law, and are not intended to provide legal advice, guidance on litigation, or commentary on any pending case or legislation.

Add Bagent now. Then when Fields and/or Watson are officially out you can add Zach Wilson or Mac Jones.