SaintsInDome2006

The National Security Counsel & White House counsel confirmed it after it happened. & for once I’ll say it would’ve been better if they’d denied it, but they couldn’t even lie right.

Signal isn’t an authorized medium for TS/SCI, period, & this discussion was above even that level. This was SCIF material no matter how you slice it. But it gets worse, Witkoff was in Moscow while doing this. And they discuss a meeting at the president’s country club, also completely reckless. And people were on the ‘chat’ who had no business in the discussion, not just Goldberg.

Bondi’s not prosecuting anyone & Patel won’t be investigating. In fact my guess is this amateur hour will continue on Signal, Telegram, open WiFi or Starlink, you name it.

Goldberg is not bound by the law on retaining classified material because he was never read in in the first place. The 17 personnel using an unauthorized platform were the ones in violation of their duty & NDA.

He logged off the platform when he saw what was happening. However my guess is Hegseth is still posting away. - Also fir the Demented Joe Biden fans, where’s the president in this chat?

Magnitude of the situation is greater. The security of the platform is weaker.

I see a considerable difference between Hillary’s storing data on a server - & IIRC it was <10 emails at Secret level or higher produced redacted by FOIA - & ***war plans***. I think the answer here is Trump & his Maga supporters were never serious about national security.

I can read the law. So can you. If you cared one whit about Hillary’s server then surely you know the statutes.

I argued that what she did was illegal. Barking up the wrong tree there.

My friend - posting on a non-secure platform like Signal is intentionally breaking the law.

I argued for that multiple times. But the worst things revealed by her screwup came as a result of Foia requests. This is 1000x beyond all that.

Shockingly the bankrupt casino owner / hotel manager, cable tv morning talk show host, & ambitious shitposter have no clue about operational security,

Buddy I was absolutely & totally against what Hillary did. ***That was a hair on a rat’s ass compared to this. To even be using Signal for this kind of thing is massively, criminally irresponsible.

So tonight Trump's ally Putin is attacking the old city of Odesa, residential neighborhoods and civil infrastructure is being targeted. The city is on fire.

I don't think Taylor is now believed to have died of food poisoning, supposedly there was some sort of dysentery generally affecting DC resulting from the fetid waters of the Potomac by the White House.

Well we could start with “American Carnage” vs “City on a Hill” but it extends to almost every area or subject. Immigration, attitude towards Russia, support of allies, support for democracy & traditional American ideals, tariffs, the economy, respect for the Constitution, on & on. IMO best comps for Trumpnin US history are Lyndon Larouche, Horace Greeley, Eugene Debs & WJ Bryan, except Trump won (2-1) & they all lost.

Zelensky wasn’t even in office when the war started. He was on TV, like Trump.

Trump is the anti-Reagan. You can have one or the other but not both.

Given the technology that exists today they could have simply searched for the term "Oswald" and just produced that. My guess is under 10% has anything to do with him. A good deal of this stuff seems like highly technical spycraft that has nothing to do with Oswald or even connected to the assassination and shouldn't have been released. And it's all entirely unredacted. The Russian and Cuban governments, and history researchers, will love it though.

Just skipping through this stuff.... and so far maybe 10 docs, not one mention of Oswald. It's a series of highly classified looking spy/intelligence stuff. I'm starting to wonder if this stuff was never produced because it's totally irrelevant.

I’m fine, I’ve read a good deal of history.

It’s been going on since 2015. The whole driving force for Maga is ‘what upsets liberals is good.’ That’s the whole thing.

I give you The Musk-Trump New Conservative Republican.

Huh, confusing, I could’ve sworn I was told that Mao wasn’t a murderer.

Ah, this is fine. Mao Tse Tung is not a murderer then. And following this conservative, logical line of reasoning, what is your take on Mao? Is he a good man who merely seized the reins of power to drive his people out of poverty?