SaintsInDome2006

Weiss, Durham, Huber, Barr, now Wray & Siebert. Golly all these bad guys…. appointed by _______.

And what happened. Weiss never charged HB on ‘the other stuff.’

No I do, the gun charge was part of the 1st plea deal. It would’ve been deferred but he also was required to do monitoring. So they ended up doing a trial for the gun charge, and we don’t know what the judge would’ve done on the sentence. The 2nd charge on taxes he pleaded guilty to anyway. - What didn’t happen, & which triggered the collapse of the plea deal, was HB getting charged on something else. Weiss never did charge him on that stuff.

It is sort of ridiculous. The plea deal included exactly what Biden was found guilty on. (& he did a plea deal on the tax charges anyway). That’s the point of plea deals, to save everyone the cost & time & trouble & risk of litigating. But if they had done a plea deal Biden would be paying back the American people & would’ve been reporting in for probation. But this way the People (us) get no accountability from the lawbreaker.

Actually I think Cruz’s question to Comey was if he wanted to change his statement and he said no. *That is the testimony they’re charging him on not the original statement. Also apparently Cruz’s original statement had to do with the ‘anonymous’ nature of the original report, & anonymous sourcing is a very specific thing with its own guidelines at FBI, so the way Cruz asked it was about whether Comey had authorized the way the reporter had couched the sourcing, which he couldn’t have possibly had any control over. It sounds like Cruz botched the question itself. The grand jury refused to indict on one of the three charges as well, & my guess is that third charge may be needed for the other two charges.

Totally neutral question here, just asking for info - what is the actual leak that is being referred to here? Was it the October surprise NYT story where they said Hillary was still under investigation or something else? TIA.

It’s Latin. Indict, dictate, predict, contradict, addict, etc.

You might want to think about the Epstein files here. And I don’t mean OMB, look at an awful man he is. I mean DOJ procedure has always said that if someone isn’t charged Thats it, thats the end of the story. You don’t both not indict then publicly indict but not charge. Well except here, Comey did that. And yes I do think what she did is or was or should be a crime, but I understand why they didn’t charge it. We have a massive national security problem with data in the highest levels & it’s only gotten mega-times worse under Trump1 & now especially Trump2. But that’s another conversation. No, FBI Directors shouldn’t run investigations themselves & they definitely shouldn’t make pronouncements themselves.

Yes, actually. You’re talking to someone who was (is) very anti-Clinton. This is not a new subject for me. However after wayyy too much thinking on the matter I can say they are not the same thing. And I actually care about the data issue. What Hegseth did was Hillary X100.And there have been multiple reports of personal email/platform use by the Trump administration. It’s a long discussion.

Buddy back in the day I likely quoted whole pieces of it. I’ve read the report, I used to ingest this stuff.

He saved Trump by carrying the investigation personally into the election season then leaking the drip-drip-drip we all used to crow about (hello) & then making a big public announcement in which he damned her as having committed the crime but also never mind he’s not charging her. So, yeah.

From the link: >>A 2018 inspector general report sided with Comey’s account, saying McCabe authorized the leak and “lacked candor” when he told his boss and later investigators that he didn’t.<< This is a trip.

Trump & smart people.

It is pretty funny. Comey who saved Trump in 2016 & Bolton who saved Trump in 2019. Trump has a burning resentment against them more than anyone.

Close, Trump’s legal porn did.

Exactly my point. It was a puss move.

And this is the truth.

Yet again leftists are running again realky well trained in long distance shots, rifle scopes & generally good knowledge of guns that your typical 2nd Amendmenter might have. Seems like a real hippie alright.

I remember once I was in a pickup basketball game and someone called a foul after they missed a layup. He got his foul shots. The look on the other guys’ faces while he took his shots. I don’t know why that comes to mind but it does.

The permit was through Sunday & it had a stated purpose of expressing free speech. The US Park Service took it down by the same afternoon of the day it went up & has still not stated a basis for the removal.

“In which he expressed his hatred of the American government.”

I have an offer from over the weekend & it’s still open for tomorrow morning - 0.5 PPR, redraft, superflex - I send McCarthy, I get Treveon Henderson in a 1-1. Just assume I’m ok at QB & RB.

>>A plaque at the base of the installation reads, “We celebrate the long-lasting bond between President Donald J. Trump and his ‘closest friend,’ Jeffrey Epstein.”<< >>The National Park Service issued a permit for the sculpture that allows it to remain on the Mall until 8 p.m. Sunday. <<

LOL yeah, they investigate & prosecute public corruption. So they weren’t “on board” is right.

They’re draining the office whose actual mission was to drain the swamp.