SaintsInDome2006

This is the part I don't get. Someone murders a mother and injures 2 children with 2X the legal limit they need to be in jail and stay in jail.

I did include the GOP there ("prior GOP & Dem DOJs were sincere") because this case has also been under Bush, Trump1 & 2 FL GOP AGs. Do you agree with my point about the girls?

I posted earlier about all the state & federal AGs who’ve had oversight over this, including Bondi twice. I think I’d even agree with you, though I think prior GOP & Dem DOJs were sincere about the rule about not implicating uncharged individuals. The difference here is Bondi is going through the pretense of reviewing & releasing material. I’ll add there are the girls to consider. No one is talking about the issue of releasing their names.

This also happened, at DOJ.

A couple weeks ago a FEMA administrator (maybe the director IIRC) !was fired after testifying that he disagreed with a White House statement that FEMA should be eliminated. So yeah the end can come quickly.

Kentucky also.

It’s beyond lying & unconstitutional behavior. This is something whereby government officials fear contradicting the leader. Imagine the consequences if she merely acknowledged the truth here.

The DOJ has rules against implicating people not charged. Aside from that & given that the Trump administration doesn’t show any compunction for following rules, & that they wouldn’t care if it was just innocent bystanders or Dems, I don’t think it’s ridiculous to think that if such tapes exist some powerful people who support or know Trump are implicated.

I’m pointing out a red state that supported Trump got hit by a major storm & it can’t get its calls answered by FEMA. My point about Hawley is he’s a guy who usually preens to get hits on a fox & right wing news but here he had to leave his posturing to directly ask the head of DHS to ask the president to look at the request. Same thing has happened in Mississippi & Arkansas.

The man himself: “Many of these folks don’t have insurance.” - It’s funny how this TV personality becomes an actual Congressman when as he puts it his people become actually “desperate.”

Sen Hawley of Deep Red Mizzou begging for assistance for his state.

Just in the way of an attempt at serious discussion about a serious topic - leaving Trump out of it FTSOA - Epstein did much of what he did if not nearly all of it at homes, his homes and others'. He traveled with the girls for instance. The premise that if Person was on Express he did nefarious things is probably incorrect and if Person didn't ride on Express he didn't do Bad Things is also likely wrong. Epstein had homes in USVI, Palm Beach, NYC, outside Santa Fe, and elsewhere, like Paris. One of the reports was about his using the home of the CEO of The Limited in Ohio for a prolonged period. IIRC Giuffre escaped from Epstein while traveling and he wanted to "loan" her out to others. It's all way past disgusting, but the assumptions are often wrong in general. Same is true of the "black book". Epstein had perhaps, no kidding, like 10 numbers to reach Trump in there but that doesn't mean Trump was a John. For instance I doubt Prince Andrew was in his book.

Hypothetically if a law was signed - any law - without presidential approval it would be a big deal. Like IMO appointing department heads illegally would be a big deal. Or creating fictitious departments would be a big deal. Or a president abolishing all past laws by imperial fiat would be a big deal.- But in general presidents - including Trump1 & Trump2 - have been doing this a long time. I have no idea how anyone thinks someone is going to invalidate any given thing done by Clinton or Obama or Biden or Bush or Trump this way.

I'm trying to think of the belief structure that says the right of habeas corpus is not only not a right but also completely unknowable because... a woman got appointed to a totally different job.

I think the 'define a woman' debate is as nuts as you do. I care about the Constitution.

Our Homeland Secretary has no clue what the right of Habeas Corpus is.

These are AG's state and fed that have had oversight of this investigation: Bill McCollum (FL AG), Pam Bondi (FL AG), Alex Acosta (USA SDFL), Eric Holder (AG), Merrick Garland (AG), Bill Barr (his father hired Epstein at the high school where he taught in NYC) (AG), Jeff Sessions (AG), Matt Whitaker (AG), Loretta Lynch (AG), Pam Bondi (again) (AG). That is a lot of covering up. This thing was D.E.A.D. Epstein was free. The only reason it got new life was a MSM journalist (the bad guys) interviewed one of Epstein's victims, Virginia Giuffre. And there were a couple other articles in between, one by New Yorker magazine IIRC. Journalists brought this to light, not underground blogging-posting "researchers."

Years and years ago here in my fair, corrupt city we had a scandal. Big prostitution ring. Doctors, judges, businessmen, lawyers, a US Senator. The judge sealed the record. Just like what happened with Epstein in Florida. It is a really serious issue, it involves massive corruption, degradation of young girls, sex crimes of the worst sort, and maybe corporate or state espionage. The biggest concern these Johns had was that Epstein would write a book. I guess Maxwell still could (really she knows practically everything, right?) but "surprisingly" she doesn't. We've got Luna after it, Blackburn, both heavily pro-maga, and I support them in that. But the reality is the data was largely taken in the 1st investigation, around 2008-2009 or so. I'd be all for Bondi naming a special counsel, and if affects the Bush/Obama/Biden era, so be it.

Can you imagine if someone like a Dan Bongino or a Jeanine Pirro was in a position to investigate that? Man, that would just blow things up.

Comey is indeed a class-A idiot. The guy starts out being loved by the GOP and hated by the Dems because he was the guy at John Ashcroft's bedside. Then he's hated by the GOP because he's appointed by Obama. Then the GOP loves him and the Dems hate him because he investigates Hillary. Then both the GOP and the Dems hate him but also love him because he simultaneously accuses and absolves Hillary. Then the Dems love him and the GOP hate him for investigating Trump & Pals. Then Trump fires him for investigating him while claiming it was because {snicker} he had investigated Hillary improperly. Then he leaves office and he insists no one forget him because he posts triggering stuff while getting upset everyone is triggered. Ex-FBI directors like ex-presidents and ex-CIA Directors should just go away.

Just guessing the number of people who have both been to a Combs party and visited Epstein at one of his homes is pretty, pretty narrow, and it definitely includes Donald Trump.

Now see this makes more sense. The Clintons likely have it in Westchester, in ChapaQua. You know who was a judge and DA in Westchester? Jeanine Pirro. She knows every square inch of Westchester. And now she is US Attorney in DC, so she would be able to investigate all the Clintons' crimes in DC. Surely Judge Jeanine will get a search warrant for the Clinton home. Shirley.

This will end some way, somehow, at a pizza business. Maybe it will be a bubble tea shop. There's no telling how deep this thing goes.

Fun thing about data, forensic experts can tell when it's been deleted. The combined powers of Patel, Bongino, Gabbard, Ratcliffe, Bondi, Pirro, Stephen Miller, Holman and Vance can surely - surely - hire competent data experts who can tell if Hillary has destroyed evidence. But you know what has to happen first? They have to open an investigation.

One, they could nail Hillary or Bill for just one. It would be earth shattering to hear there’s even an investigation into it.