Beyond Chaos

Don't see the Pats doing anything if the league doesn't. They've already had a murderer on the team, can't go much lower than that.

Tyreek and Justice? What about the T.Y. HILton

I would probably take Julio. If Pitt can't get a #2 guy going, it will be a long year for JuJu.

I would probably go with the Godwin for Cooks offer.

Add the loss of a potential T. Hill return for a TD and KC D/ST has lost it's appeal. I'd probably take Houston.

You've been out of the game for too long.

Too early to tell, Thielen still did ok because of the TD. They also were up 14-0 after 1, 21-0 at the half, and 28-0 after the 3rd. The run was working so they didn't have to pass much.

2nd best maybe I'd put him behind Bell.

I'm going to chalk this one up as a loss.

Don't have any info, but maybe he got nostalgic after last night and wants to come back.

Personally, I'd rather have McCoy than Michel at this point, but I've been wrong many times before. I think you hit the nail on the head with the inconsistencies of a Pats back. McCoy may be a higher injury risk, but I think his numbers will be more consistent than Michels if he stays healthy. Michels might have a career game next week, then completely disappear the following just due to Bellichek exploiting an opponent's weakness.

I think he's good to go until Hill is back in the lineup. Then back to the inconsistency, but who knows for certain.

10 team, 0.5 ppr, 0.1 pt per yd, 6 pt per TD Start 2 WR and 1 Flex: WR: R.Woods @ Car Edelman vs Pit Lockett vs Cin Gordon vs Pit RB: A. Jones @ Chi starting Bell and Conner for sure so A. Jones would have to be the flex, but having some trouble deciding if I should start 3 WRs and bench Jones due to the uncertainty of usage and the tough D. Leave a link and I'll offer my opinion.

Thanks. I am not counting on it, especially against the Saints.

That's still a good amount to me. How many times your wager is your 4 team parlay payout, just curious?

Nice. If you're really worried you could a hedge a play with Oakland. It's always nice to lock in some gains, but can understand the live or die by the sword mentality.

Doesn't look like it's going to happen, I'm down about 15pts with Houston D left against their Josh Jacobs. Unfortunately, they had L. Jackson in. I had Prescott on the bench but wasn't going to put him in over Goff, but I guess I should have because I'd be up about 8 instead of down 15.

I see many Browns games being in Ohio and over the years a good amount of talent has gone through that organization. I haven't been paying attention to the management/coaching changes lately, but that has always been the problem as long as I can remember. I know it's only one game, but it's shaping up to be that way again.

Did you do a parlay?

I expect nothing less from Tomlin.

I like to think of it as the first of many.

you look at the Lions boxscore and see that Matt Stafford is leading the team in rushing with 22 yds and they are still up 14.

Jets D is no push over. It's their offense that stinks.

Went with Jones, Edelman, and Lockett. The main reason I sat Woods was because I had Goff as my QB. Looking like Jones was the guy to sit. Hindsight''s 20/20. Thanks all for the help.

I'm not sure of his ability to pickup the offense, but watching just about every game he's played in as a Steelers fan many of his big plays were a result of Ben scrambling around or shedding tackles and both of them improvising on a play. Don't get me wrong AB is a superior route runner, but many of his long TDs were a result of breaking off a route and finding a hole in the defense. Brady hardly ever scrambles and unloads the ball faster than anyone I can think of so the majority of his big plays are going to come from design rather than improvisation. I can't say this will be positive or negative for him, so I guess I'll just have to see how this plays out. As far as the money to pay him, I know Brady and I'm sure others on that team consistently take pay cuts so they can bring in talent. They probably had some cap room.