Jump to content

IGotWorms

Members
  • Content Count

    66,355
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    69

Everything posted by IGotWorms

  1. Yes, when you’ve raised it to the level of an existential threat!! to the country’s continued existence
  2. @jonmx got confused as to which side was giving the press conference?
  3. What’s funny is you guys don’t understand the term transphobia. You don’t necessary have to love the trans movement (I don’t); it’s when it becomes an irrationally huge fear that you’re transphobic. Like arachnophobia. There are poisonous spiders out there you should be wary of. You don’t have to deny that. But it shouldn’t run your life either
  4. IGotWorms

    JK Rowling.

    Frankly that Harry Potter crap was garbage literature, imo. But I don’t like fantasy so maybe that’s it. Anyway, she’s the new Ayne Rand. Hooray for her
  5. IGotWorms

    Harrison Butker, geek club hero

    Butker is a huge assh0le, is my thought. Don’t really need to get into the substance of what he said —though it is asinine— but who the fock tells women graduating that day and getting their college diploma that they belong in the kitchen and not the workplace? Only a focking assh0le, that’s who. Anyway, he’s a pretty good kicker though. Should probably just stick to that
  6. Ok jer bear, we’re Marxist heathens as demonstrated through the trans issue. Now do the replacement part and you’ve covered “white Christian nationalist”
  7. Does anyone like Eric Adams? I don’t follow NYC politics very closely but my understand is he’s basically a mob guy, or acts like it?
  8. You brought up trans in your OP. Do you even understand your own posts? And of course it’s about trans because that’s your morality concern. What else would it be? But no, do get to that replacement thread because that’s what you really mean. The existence of trans people is not an “existential threat” to this nation and you know it. I’ll look forward to your “nuance” aka rationalizing your racist beliefs
  9. IGotWorms

    Chiefs WR's

    I would’ve said Rice but he’s sure gotten himself into some trouble. I dunno, maybe he somehow skirts punishment or it doesn’t come down this year. Bears watching. Otherwise I’m saying Hollywood Brown. He’s not actually that great but Worthy will take time to develop, Watson is a JAG, and it doesn’t seem like Moore will turn in to much. Kelce is another year older so they can’t just lean on him even more. I suppose there’s an outside chance Toney keeps his head screwed on straight for one season? But that’s definitely a dark horse play
  10. Sure, like I said, cohen is very easy to impeach, because he’s a lying piece of sh1t. But he was Trump’s right hand man, because Trump is also a lying piece of sh1t who surrounds himself with the same. Some defense you got there. Plus Cohen’s testimony is almost irrelevant, there is so much other corroborating evidence. It will come down to the documents.
  11. Of course I understand that. However, if all the evidence is on one side and there is no contrary evidence — not even a statement of denial under oath — then it sure seems to favor the prosecution. So yeah, you can try going with the “the prosecution didn’t meet its burden” theory, and it may well be the only one available here, but in these circumstances and with this kind of case, the jury’s just going to be thinking “well I never even heard anyone deny any of it.” Not one thing refuted under oath or by documentary evidence. Ouch
  12. Of course he will not testify. Zero percent chance. But it does beg the question of exactly how they will mount any sort of defense. Trump would have to take the stand and say “I never focked Stormy Daniels” and “I never directed or knew that cohen was making those payments.” Without that the evidence is essentially unchallenged. There is no contrary evidence to weigh — only the prosecution’s version. So I don’t know how they get around that. My guess is put on some BS to claim they made a “defense” but in substance there will be very little. Either way though, absolutely no way Trump testifies. Zero.
  13. These cohen attacks are a double edged sword. Yes he is an odious person and a well known POS liar. Should definitely point that out. But the more and more you hammer on it it’s like, wait, didn’t Trump pick this guy as his right hand man? Why does he surround himself with two bit piece of sh1t liars and doesn’t that indicate that he’s an extreme piece of sh1t himself? (Yes, it does, and he is.)
  14. Meh, trials are hard. People have this idea from movies and TV shows that it’s all smooth and masterful, and at times it can be, but most of it is just fumbling around and confusion
  15. So I called the transphobia but where’s the racism? Y’all are dancing around it with the “Judeo Christian nation” stuff, and RLLD is, as usual, leading the charge for outright saying it, but you haven’t gotten there yet. Cmon, you know you want to. Jerry you know this isn’t about trans. That’s a side issue. One that gets you guys going, yes, but it isn’t the real root of your concern. What’s really got you worked up is that “replacement” thing, no?
  16. IGotWorms

    Pelosi: Populism is a Threat to Democracy

    You’ve already done this stupid thread, jon. Populism needs to be guarded against. The “tyranny of the majority.” The founding fathers knew this, that’s the whole reason we have the bill of rights and so forth. Separation of powers as embodied in the US Constitution. Guess you hate that? And yes, you probably do, since you’re just a Russian troll.
  17. That’s it, right there. Should’ve been charged with treason
  18. After Trump asked them to. No conspiracy (“collusion” is not a legal term) my ass, Mueller was just too cowardly.
  19. IGotWorms

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    Agreed and I'd also point out Biden has used that strategy himself in the past. He was much younger then but that’s partly how he destroyed Paul Ryan’s career in the VP debate — laughing at him and mocking him while Ryan was speaking
  20. Oasis did it. Though they were only good for a few years long ago…
  21. IGotWorms

    Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

    Gotta hide that 280 pound girth somehow
  22. IGotWorms

    Which Megyn/Meghan you got?

    Markel, though I wouldn’t begrudge a man for choosing Kelly
  23. IGotWorms

    Jared Goff Extension

    You’re welcome?
  24. An Alabama Supreme Court’s ruling that frozen embryos in test tubes should be considered children has sent shock waves through the world of reproductive medicine, casting doubt over fertility care for would-be parents in the state and raising complex legal questions with implications extending far beyond Alabama. On Tuesday, Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House press secretary, said the ruling would cause “exactly the type of chaos that we expected when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and paved the way for politicians to dictate some of the most personal decisions families can make.” Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One as President Biden traveled to California, Ms. Jean-Pierre reiterated the Biden administration’s call for Congress to codify the protections of Roe v. Wade into federal law. “As a reminder, this is the same state whose attorney general threatened to prosecute people who help women travel out of state to seek the care they need,” she said, referring to Alabama, which began enforcing a total abortion ban in June 2022. The judges issued the ruling on Friday in appeals cases brought by couples whose embryos were destroyed in 2020, when a hospital patient removed frozen embryos from tanks of liquid nitrogen in Mobile and dropped them on the floor. Referencing antiabortion language in the state constitution, the judges’ majority opinion said that an 1872 statute allowing parents to sue over the wrongful death of a minor child applies to unborn children, with no exception for “extrauterine children.” “Even before birth, all human beings have the image of God, and their lives cannot be destroyed without effacing his glory,” Chief Justice Tom Parker wrote in a concurring opinion, citing scripture. Infertility specialists and legal experts said the ruling had potentially profound effects, which should be of concern to every American who may need to access reproductive services like in vitro fertilization. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/20/health/ivf-alabama-abortion.html
×