IGotWorms

As I understand there are audio recordings and testimony of several others, plus a jury can rely on circumstantial evidence and draw inferences. I think it’s a pretty strong case even with cohen’s substantial credibility issues, but I suppose we’ll find out

Yeah like I said, this case will be won or lost by the paper trail. I wish cohen didn’t have to testify at all but they probably need him merely to authenticate some documents

Aiding and comforting the enemy. It’s all part of his effort to destroy NATO because he can’t get enough of Putin’s dong

Now here’s something we agree on. Except I don’t think cohens testimony will matter much, if at all, on its own. The issue is the paper trail. If it’s there that damns trump regardless of whether cohen has any credibility at all as a witness (and he shouldn’t)

Avenatti has been thoroughly discredited. And mostly by your side

It’s an interesting issue imo. I mostly agree with weepers and wiffleball on this, but I do think, like strike is essentially saying, that cities and towns still need to be able regulate their public spaces and not have them filled up with homeless shanty towns. I don’t agree that auschwitz is the answer and think you’re a POS if you do. Yeah yeah I know, joking

A. “Collusion” is not the applicable legal term. It was made up by Trump because it sounds harder to prove. B. The special prosecutor said that Russia was willing to help Trump and that Trump wanted to receive that help. Mueller said he couldn’t bridge the gap to show the two actually conspired towards those ends. I think that was a cop out. HTH. I recommend reading the actual mueller report if you want to know what he really said and found.

Did they pass aid for the moon?

That’s shocking, if true. I mean, in a way it’s totally obvious. Trump asked for, and received, Putin’s help in winning the 2016 election. And he’s been throating Putin’s knob ever since. But still, for an American president to say that… it’s treasonous

Or letting dudes take out her fake tatas for all to see

Stay classy, Boobert!

The Supreme Court case that’s being heard on Monday. Read the link. But essentially, ninth circuit has held you can’t criminalize homelessness when there are not homeless shelters available. They say it’s cruel and unusual punishment under the eighth amendment. Cities and towns don’t like it because they want to kick the homeless out.

Very atypical for me in that I find him pretty annoying and yet, somehow, I do like him. Usually if I can’t stand em that’s that

It’s all about Putin baby. MAGA him

What are you, stupid?

Could happen. It’s called a quagmire. Not ideal, for sure, but neither was Russia’s invading in the first place.

She got nice gams and that b00b job was pretty well done

Nice, sounds like a great experience!

Another inane response.

Your posts are stupid. They make no sense

Okay, so what? The question is what to do today. And you want to abandon them

MAGA are the ones that want to abandon Ukraine. If Trump disagrees, he better get his lackeys in line

No I am essentially willing to use my tax dollars to provide military assistance