IGotWorms

Whoa! The lack of self-awareness is astounding

Maybe the local news. MAYBE.

You guys are totally right. If only France could be like the US, and then he would’ve had an AR15 and killed 30 people. Pvssy-ass French with their knives

Dear Zachary was a “classic” (sorta weird to use that term in relation to such an upsetting doc)

Pretty interesting doc you can watch for free on YouTube right now: Lots of footage of a city under siege in modern times. Pretty crazy to see the destruction and breakdown.

Looks like they made her lips swell up into a hideously stupid looking duck face https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/11/28/politics/wife-of-ukraines-top-military-intelligence-hospitalized/index.html It may be permanent

Belichick will be gone. But that’s exactly why he’d Fock ‘em on his way out

Super awesome thread, bro

Fixed

Only tragedy is he made it to 100

Or he’s just focking stoopid. Always hard to tell with him

You don’t need to have that, it isn’t an impeachment proceeding. So it’s a pretty disingenuous argument really. I guess they’re saying US Congressmen should have to be impeached just like presidents and members of the judiciary, but that’s not the way it was set up and probably for pretty good reason. I mean you’re just one of 435 in Congress. The real issue for the Rs is they have a super slim majority as it is and don’t want to lose even one vote. Also they might be worried ol’ Georgey will squeal on em — after all he publicly threatened to do so

lol, the only person I see people protecting here is Trump (mostly HT)

Haha you guys are focking dumb. 112 republicans voted to keep Santos, including all the top leaders! More republicans voted to keep him then ship him out

Can’t help yourself

Has anyone said otherwise, dumbo? If bill Clinton is “on the list” (I don’t think it’s a literal list??) then fock him. If Joe Biden is, fock him. If Barry Obama is, fock him. Etc etc etc HTH!

Seemed like an angry, spiteful attitude you had towards them as a group But anyway, sorry, I really don’t want to derail your congratulatory thread. That is really an awesome achievement by your daughter and you must’ve been a pretty damn good dad to have raised such a bright and motivated woman

Not my fault you can’t read Jerry.

Yeah and I think literally everyone here has said that

Haha you hate trannies but your daughter is a lesbian? Sorry to be an ahole but that is pretty hysterical

Some of you have short memories. It was mostly the defense and running game ‘01-‘04. Brady was clutch but he did not drive those offenses. Later on it mostly was Brady, though again, people forget that Belichick did have a pretty successful run as GM. It’s in the last 5-10 years that his drafts fell off and the talent dried up. But anyways, yes, those last three championships were mostly Brady

No he is not good. He did have a short little run last year before defenses figured him out. Since then it’s been awful and he’s just not physically gifted enough

Yeah you read that right. These guys are CNN — Following what some conservatives view as legal victories on the battlegrounds of abortion rights and affirmative action, a number of politicians and influencers are turning their attention to another long-held construct: No-fault divorce. Right-wing commentators like Steven Crowder and Matt Walsh have ramped up complaints in recent months that it is too easy for people — specifically women — to get divorces. All states currently have some version of a no-fault divorce law, but Republicans in Texas and Nebraska list the dissolution or restriction of no-fault divorce in their state party political platforms. In Louisiana earlier this year, state GOP members debated officially backing the dissolution of no-fault divorce, but no decision was made. A lack of full-on legislative attempts to curb the practice hasn’t stopped an abundance of conservative anti-divorce rhetoric, or an answering wave of fear from progressives. Newly minted House Speaker Mike Johnson has been a vocal opponent of no-fault divorce, which allows couples to obtain a divorce without proving fault — and without both parties agreeing to the split. In a 2016 sermon, he claimed it turned the United States into a “completely amoral society.” Though no-fault divorce was first legalized more than 50 years ago, it has long been sneered at in conservative circles, who see it as a danger to the sanctity of marriage and the concept of the American family. For feminists, human rights advocates and others, no-fault divorce is an important buttress for gender equality and directly addresses issues like marital abuse. Many legal minds also see no-fault divorce as a common-sense legal path that reduces unnecessary burdens on courts and couples alike. https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/27/us/no-fault-divorce-explained-history-wellness-cec/index.html