IGotWorms

Alright well spit it out then

The bolded is completely false. The rest isn’t what I said. I flat-out told you I don’t know what the answer is. Simply that, yes, lots of civilians are being killed in Gaza, and yes, that is an issue. Of course it’s an issue.

Your first paragraph is exactly what I acknowledged The rest is childish. Yes Hamas needs to be eradicated. Yes lots of civilians are being killed by Israel. Yes there is a tension there. HTH And then to invoke Russia invading Ukraine? While claiming I am not sufficiently defending the West?? Putin’s whole thing is to try to beat the West, you dummy.

Evidently, you can’t read

Yeah that’s a fair counterpoint. But personally, I think he’s lost his touch. It happens at 70+

You must be classy. I get the horrible Honda adds

There were some murmurs about one of his daughters. Seemed to come from the racist segment so I’m guessing she got herself into some trouble that they thought could be used to smear black people generally

“For DNC”? Pretty sure they’re protesting against the DNC, dumbass

You used to be a smart fella. But you’ve gone way down the rabbit hole and now I guess I have to explain things to you like you’re a toddler It is, indeed, highly doubtful that Israel is attacking hospitals just to do it. Much more likely is that they are targeting Hamas either in the hospital or in tunnels right underneath. However, obviously, there will be significant collateral damage when you target right under a hospital. So the question is what is the acceptable risk there? Israel says we don’t care, it’s not our problem, Hamas built the tunnels under there on purpose so it’s their fault. But there is a counter, which is that regardless of what Hamas has done or their purposeful use of civilians as human shields, Israel still has an obligation not to blow up hospitals where civilians are being treated. Now I don’t even know where I, personally, come down on this, because I do see both sides here. But to pretend like it’s not even a question for debate is either extremely silly or ridiculously stupid.

She’s cute when she’s angry

Yeah that’s reasonable. But also: This.

There's nothing that wild about it. The story is Pelosi was trying to keep calm this crazy focking lunatic who had broken into his house and wanted to find and seriously injure or kill his wife, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives. If that story were not true — and try to follow along here — the defense at trial would be that something else was, in fact, happening. That it was a lovers’ quarrel or whatever. Because that’s a far better defense than “yeah he did it but he was a lunatic MAGAtard.” And yet that isn’t the defense. Because there’s nothing to support it. Because it isn’t true

What are you, stupid? There would be texts or phone logs. There would be video of Pelosi answering the front door with his d1ck in his hands vs a guy breaking in. There would be all kinds of links and evidence

Pretty sure the defense could prove if pelosi had this dude over for a fock session

That’s like trying to bring democracy to Afghanistan

Oh that’s crazy too. But not Idaho crazy

Funny thing is they don’t understand how fuckin crazy those Idahoans are

You can put on whatever defense you want, including “it was a ghey lovers’ quarrel.” And yet they’ve never claimed that

This conspiracy crap is straight from the MAGA handbook

That’s why we have a trial

Watson hasn’t been great but PJ Brown is a disaster

Because it’s false, just like most narratives you guys peddle

The primary takeaway is that you’re a fockin idiot for having given credence to MAGA conspiracy theories, as usual. HTH