IGotWorms

It’s a mess. They don’t remember details, daydream, doze off, can’t hear certain witnesses, miss the magnitude of certain evidence… it’s really all a mess. It does need to be made better but courts have no money and are stuck way in the past

Well, Ukraine has been fighting with one arm tied behind their back. But I am concerned about the provocation here… Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken suggested on Wednesday that the Biden administration could be open to tolerating strikes by the Ukrainian military inside Russia, saying that the United States would “adapt and adjust” its stance based on changing conditions on the battlefield. Mr. Blinken said that the United States had neither encouraged nor enabled such attacks. But he said that the Ukrainians needed to make their own decisions on how to best defend themselves — a position he has stated before — and that the U.S. government had “adapted and adjusted as necessary” as the war evolves. When asked by a reporter whether his words meant the United States could support attacks by Ukraine inside Russia, he said, “Adapt and adjust means exactly that.” Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Washington has sent the Ukrainians military aid but has repeatedly asked that they not fire U.S.-made weapons into Russian territory for fear of escalating the war. Several European leaders have called on President Biden to stop imposing those limits, among them Jens Stoltenberg, the secretary general of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and Emmanuel Macron, the president of France.

Which wasn’t fauci’s jurisdiction. Seems like you’ve got Newsome to blame for that. But anyway, it was still four years ago…

Ehh, the movie was overrated and he was just okay. IMO, he hasn’t been great since the 90s

Lockdowns were like two weeks. Four years ago. Time to move on

The Donald is 80. He’ll die someday

Who gives a fock? Dumb “controversy”

Gun thrown — that was quick!

The jury selection is just how it works. You weed out the people who say they can’t be impartial or where it’s clear they can’t be impartial regardless of what they say. Changing venue makes no sense where the defendant is universally known — you’ll have the same problem in Buffalo or wherever the fock they wanted, and that venue doesn’t even have any relation to the case. The rulings don’t seem that crazy to me but that’s what appeals are for. Whether Trump did anything illegal is for the jury to decide. That’s why we do this process.

You’re the one that claims he’s lying. Your burden to prove

What was on it then?

Get over the Fauci stuff. That’s MAGA garbage. But as for the rest, yes they both deserve credit. Trump got that vaccine out in an incredible amount of time. He also staved off a depression with substantial and immediate stimulus. Biden then continued that on and brought us to a “soft landing” with no huge economic collapse. It’s impressive and they both should be proud. Sure inflation was a problem for a year or two and it still needs to shave another half a percent, but compared to a Great Depression-style collapse (or even the Great Recession, which dragged on for years and years), this was definitely a preferable outcome.

You could prove him wrong, no?

Why do you think there will not be a fair outcome? Isn't this how we decide these things in this country? Trial before a jury of your peers? And we respect the outcome, right?

How so? Give a substantive response here — if you can

What a weird line of attack. It’s a pretty big deal that the jury is now deliberating and could come back with a verdict basically any time now. I think you’re showing yourself as a hack

The neighbors in question said they never even saw it

Oh my god, Hunter Biden once owned a laptop computer??! Well if that’s not a smoking gun, I don’t know what is!

I was going to say Pattinson too. He was great in The Lighthouse and Good Time. Feel like I’ve seen him shine in some other stuff too. He is as good at acting as Kristen Stewart is bad

This is % correct. I do not know, or care, what stupid unrelated bullsh1t HT has been going on about in this thread

Stupid

So you think the evidence against Trump is overwhelming?

Sounds like Blanche did a pretty good job. Really with the whole case, except that one witness the defense called (which probably won’t matter much)

That’s a healthy attitude. I just couldn’t stomach the guy. But that’s if I was a hanger-on that didn’t need to be there anyway. If I were on the team or coaching staff etc, I would feel obligated.