-
Content Count
64,138 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
66
Posts posted by IGotWorms
-
-
17 hours ago, jonmx said:But that is the problem. It should not be about winning the election. It should be about was justice served. I outlined 7 reasons in the trial thread why this case was a gross miscarriage of justice. But nobody cares. You don't care. It is about getting Trump and winning.
I care about justice. You don't bring charges because you hate someone. You bring charges because it is a fair administration of justice. That is why I hated the trials for Rittenhouse and Zimmerman. Those trials were not to administer justice, those trials were to punish people on the wrong political side. Neither of those cases had any chance of success in a fair trial. But the point was to punish those bastards because the left hated their guts by dragging them through the hell of going through a murder trial.
This trial got the political result because it was carefully rigged. There is zero chance this stands up to appeal. There were far too many errors which all favored the prosecution.
Um no. Stupid statement
-
It’s true, they have no substantive ideas except more tax cuts for the rich
-
1
-
-
Burn in hell!!
Hey, thanks for reading
-
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:Clownzo cultists call for violence.
Well I would say they’re not serious and to just ignore them… but there was January 6
-
Scab!
-
29 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:Will Trump be sentenced to jail or will the corrupt judge make him carry a cross and wear a crown of thorns through NYC while left wing traitors shoot dice for one of his trademark ties?
It’d be kinda cool if they aired that. A modern day walking of Cersei through King’s Landing
-
How disturbed some corners of the internet can be
-
1
-
-
All this stuff about the charges was already argued and decided in the motions to dismiss.
I am sure there will be an appeal but until that’s heard and decided, these are really moot points
-
-
5 minutes ago, jonmx said:JFC....every attorney who ever existed advises their client not to testify.
You side is full of a bunch of disingenous bootlicking low-life liars.
Well no sh1t Jonnie boy. Trump is the one making an issue of it
-
1
-
-
I’m just really proud of our country for being the greatest nation on earth. Agree or disagree, we’ve got our systems that keep us strong and we revere them
-
2
-
-
I respect verdicts. Because I’m an American
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:Naw just if he showers with his daughter and touches kids
Hack
-
4 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:him standing with Epstein at a party means hes a pedo? cool
It sure as fock would if it’d been Biden
-
Unanimously guilty on 34 counts but it’s rigged
-
37 minutes ago, squistion said:I don't see any violence coming from the left even if Trump is acquitted of all charges.
I saw Chris Hayes on MSNBC last night and he said (paraphrasing) that no matter what the jury verdict is, this trial shows that the legal system worked and that no one is above the law.
Well said. Hopefully there are enough people left in this country who can still respect the verdict, whatever it may be
-
1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:omg elite guy was at a party with another elite guy
if Trump was on the list your party would sacrifice everyone to take him down, thats how severe the TDS is
Oh now you’re excusing pedophilia! Color me shocked
-
Just now, TimHauck said:He has done this a couple times, I still wouldn’t call him a “right wing but job” though. He certainly leans right however
His tweets often indicate he’s a nutjob. Basically any right wing conspiracy he buys into. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was even into “chemtrails” and crap, that’s how nutso he can seem.
But I dunno, it must be an act to some extent because I can’t see how he could be such a successful businessman if he really is that unhinged.
-
49 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:and yet you vote for the guy who molested his
This might not be your best line of attack
-
Just now, jonmx said:Have you ever heard of a trial where the jury was not given a hard copy of the jury instructions???? This judge is so bizzare. It is as if the judge wants to control how the jury hears the instructions and to be able to spin it.
I have never heard of that before. It is a little strange. I’m guessing it’s a New York thing but really don’t know
-
1
-
-
Wouldn’t mind his input on stuff like manned space programs (which we’ve basically privatized) and trade
-
Wanting the instructions re-read on drawing inferences could be bad for Trump. What I’ve been saying all along is even if you completely disregard the entirety of cohen’s testimony, you can still easily get there through circumstantial evidence and inferences (which is how most cases are made)
-
1 hour ago, BrahmaBulls said:You ever find the hate, dipshit?
Yep and I gave it to your mom last night
-
57 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:Correct. The “Appeal to Heaven” flag has a long history of being an extremist symbol going back to two weeks ago when you retards first heard about it.
I’ve known about it for a couple years now. My POS white supremacist neighbors like to fly it in a rotation with don’t tread on me and the blue line one. There’s a few others I don’t understand but I’m sure they’re even worse
The state of the Presidential race
in The Geek Club
Posted
It’s a dumb question to ask if the verdict “was correct.” They should be asking if the system worked or if people respect the verdict.
With Rittenhouse and Zimmerman, I did not think the verdict was “correct,” but I do think the system worked as it was supposed to and that those verdicts must be respected.