Jump to content

IGotWorms

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    63,514

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

Posts posted by IGotWorms

  1. Posted

    25 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

    Where is that war at currently. Do you know a link to a current map of what land Russia occupies in the east of Ukraine currently? What progress or setbacks has Ukraine had in the last couple months? What is Ukraine's plan to win the war? I don't have any website to go to for this information that I know of.

    I don’t understand your point.

    If things aren’t going well for Ukraine, doesn’t that mean they need our help even more?

    When did it become acceptable to just lay down and quit? Jesus, imagine if MAGA was in charge when Hitler was laying waste to Europe 😢

    • Like 1

  4. Posted

    5 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

    No it wasn't an empty threat. Those words were for if Putin invaded Ukraine while Trump was President. As Putin invaded Ukraine while Biden was pres, it's Biden's fault, not Putin's. Trump won't retaliate against Moscow because of Biden's blunder. Maybe Biden should fix this he's the president now.

    Jesus 😂

  5. Posted

    57 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

    I’m not going to call anyone here an idiot, or a retard, or a bad person, or a traitor. You guys are entitled to your opinions, and I don’t think any of you who wants us to stop helping Ukraine fall into those categories. 

    But I urge you to reconsider. It really isn’t in our best interest to allow Ukraine to fail. It puts us, roughly, in the same situation that Neville Chamberlain put England in after he gave up the Sudetenland to Hitler: making a geopolitical enemy far more powerful while at the same time being committed to the defense of her most immediate neighbors. It puts us at great risk and in the end may cost us far more than we are spending now, not only in money but the blood of our children. Please think twice about promoting isolationism in the face of an aggressor. 

    Except it’s all because of Putin. Most of these same people are all for helping Israel. So why not Ukraine? Because Putin helped Trump — that’s it.

  7. Posted

    Just now, cyclone24 said:

    Comparing Taiwan to ukraine is comical and you know it.

    I do? Why?

    In both instances, you would be protecting a western-leaning nation from takeover by an autocrat.

    Only real difference is Putin helped Trump win an election but Xi hasn’t quite. Yet.

    And that makes you deplorable

    • Like 1

  9. Posted

    5 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

    Ya its bad news for you “Fund a losing war with our tax dollars” folks. Sorry. 
     

    I know you guys will cheer on china so we can spend it on taiwan in 6 months. Ghouls 

    I will not cheer on China, but I also won’t want to abandon Taiwan at the first sign of trouble, like you :thumbsdown:


    However, Trump doesn’t suck Xi’s c0ck quite like he does Putin’s, so maybe you’ll decide it’s okay to stand against China :dunno:

  13. Posted

    Trans fats that is.

    Seems like they shouldn’t be allowed in sports, right? Maybe o-linemen or sumo wrestling but otherwise keep em away.

    And if they’re in the bathroom, that’s not good either. If you have to go into the sh1tter to sneak your fifth doughnut of the day, you may have a problem.

    Hell, I wouldn’t be opposed to banning them altogether :o 

     


     

    Trans fat is considered the worst type of fat to eat. Unlike other dietary fats, trans fats — also called trans-fatty acids — raise "bad" cholesterol and also lowers "good" cholesterol.

    A diet laden with trans fats increases the risk of heart disease, the leading killer of adults. The more trans fats eaten, the greater the risk of heart and blood vessel disease.

    https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/high-blood-cholesterol/in-depth/trans-fat/art-20046114#:~:text=Unlike other dietary fats%2C trans,heart and blood vessel disease.

  22. Posted

    8 hours ago, jerryskids said:

    Well actually, I spent most of yesterday golfing.  Shot a 90 -- tee to green I could have maybe broken 80, but my short game was shiot.  That's what happens when you don't play enough. 

    But thanks for the concern.

    Also I thought my response to the tl;dr was funny, in part because you said tl;dr to a post that basically called you a not very good lawyer, and you didn't even bother to read it.  I'm not sure what that puts me on tilt.

    I'd have to go back and reread the "bot" comment I responded to.  I imagine it was stupid, though, given my comment. :dunno: 

    I've honestly been trying to welcome Dozer here.  He's a liberal like you, you should encourage my behavior.  I think he would agree that I've been doing so.

    Glad your golf game is going well :cheers:

     

    (For me, 80 or even 90 would be great)

  23. Posted

    1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

    I'm on tilt? Great detective work, counselor. :lol:

     


    You spent most of yesterday lashing out at pretty much everyone in here, bud :( 

     

    19 hours ago, jerryskids said:

    He said you aren't a very good pretend lawyer.

     

    15 hours ago, jerryskids said:

    Nobody is this stupid, you must be a bot.  So, greetings, bot.  :dunno: 

     

    13 hours ago, jerryskids said:

    I've tried to welcome you as a poster here, despite the advice of numerous other posters.  But I don't know what to do with your initial post.

    "But the orange man is bad, right?"  What response to you expect from this?  Do you want me to say that it's OK for NY to dredge up old cases that both the feds and prior NY admins rightfully decided were nothingburgers, but the current admin decided that "orange man is bad, right?", so here we are, prosecuting the Republican POTUS candidate for it?  Sorry, I won't sign up for that.

    Help me help you, if I'm missing something.

     

  24. Posted

    2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

    Because your house is going for top dollar right now? If you’re downsizing and old why would you want a mortgage at all? Why don’t you people ever read the whole thing? 

    Ideally, yes. But it seems many boomers did not plan that well

  25. Posted

    17 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

    A big problem is boomers not selling their houses as they age. My subdivision has about 30 houses and over half of them are older people with no kids or adult children 

    If you’ve got a mortgage at 2.5% why would you want to “downsize” to a 7% mortgage that would cost you as much or more for a smaller, sh1tier house? That’s a big part of the issue there, but time will heal that as people eventually HAVE to move — hell, to the cemetery if nowhere else in between 

×