jerryskids

My hayfever is acting up from this strawman. Also, inaccurate strawman. But hey, weepaws is on your side, so you've got that going for you. He hates fellow Christians like you hate fellow Jews.

Oh well, I guess your anecdotal feelings supersede all of the links in that article to actual data. That adds credibility to your asinine assertion that he wasn't a hillbilly, and that a Yale law grad is an idiot.

You should read the recent Compact Mag article, "The Lost Generation," to learn some statistics about how many industries went ape-shiot DEI for hiring in the past 10 years or so. https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-lost-generation/ Too many stats to quote; here are a few examples from media:

Yeah, still a phayle, sorry. Abstracting from the possibility that something happened to the person in your link to add trans to their litany of other diagnoses, the overall premise is just weak. You should have taken my advice, oh well.

Sorry, still don't get it. Are you saying that all motives need to be the same? Maybe you should just toss this gotcha into the phayle pile with all of your others, and save us all some time.

I'm not following your attempted gotcha du jour, what is your point?

The biggest mistake the R's could make, and probably will, is to try to keep the Trump/MAGA coalition unchanged in 2028. Like him or not, there is only one Trump. Trump is MAGA, and MAGA is Trump. I'll add that I would be hard pressed to vote from a Rep from the Tucker Qatarlson / Groyper block.

I would never vote for Newsome; I think he may literally be Satan's spawn. No one from Team Bernie Free Stuff either, including AOC. I'd look at Josh Shapiro, he seems somewhat moderate and reasonable. Not surprised that we disagree, but I think Vance has a lot of charisma, more than Rubio, who just seems... forced somehow. Vance could have destroyed Tampon Tim mumbling bumbling stumbling through the debate, but his role was to be the nice, sane one to offset Trump a bit, and he did it to perfection. If Vance were unleashed in a debate, he would be a formidable opponent. I voted for Desantis last time and still like him. I wouldn't blame him if he stays in his current gig as King of Florida, tho.

This guy is pretty focking smart: Not only did I predict Maye's success, but in a "gay for Maye" thread, I said I wouldn't mind going in on him!

Hmm... black women don't get married; they have all of their babies out of wedlock. So, not black?

Weepaws showing he knows nothing about Christmas. About the least surprising thing ever.

Thanks. What a maroon! First comment says it all.

So, why did you post the first document, Muslim strawman guy? That pdf came up black pages for me. Had it not... I still wouldn't have read it. If you want to point out specific info in there which says Trump molested children, feel free. I'm guessing you won't, because like your first whiff, it isn't in there.

Where in that 15 minute video is the action?

And here I thought you hated straw men. This post is a hay field. In case you forgot, the point was you posting a link in support of Trump molesting young girls which did absolutely none of that. HTH

Yeah, when I hear "mass deportation," I think deportation... on a mass level. I'm happy to have experts like you who are in the know so I can learn that it's a coded reference to Nazi 2.0. Sorry, not working. I tried. It's still dumb.

By "decent comment," do you mean the one where you conclude that since they use the phrase "mass deportation," they are like the Nazis? If so, you might want to reconsider your classification system, because to call that decent is to insult mediocrity everywhere.

So if I understand, I posted a comment "some reports are saying..." and you chastise me for not vetting it, but in response to a request for evidence to support the statement that Trump molested young girls, you provided a link which 100% does NOT do that in any way. But it fits your model of Trump, so it's (D)ifferent. Tell me if I got something wrong here.

Can you point out where in that first link it shows that Trump raped underage girls. Perhaps this part? TIA!

Reminds me of a dad joke I just heard: Someone asked me which kid is my favorite... I found out I was supposed to pick one of mine.

Sorry I wasted my time explaining that. I guess trolls gonna troll. At least I know you think Israel is morally equivalent to Hamas, so intelligent discussion is impossible. Have a good night

It's not dozens of sources. It's dozens of media sites quoting the same source -- the Hamas Information Minister. Heck, your two links have the same number (well, 94 and 95). Do you think they dozens of sources each individually counted the corpses of the women and children brutally shot in cold blood by the Jewish soldiers? Plenty of horrendous behavior. It's the same! Yes, I'm aware the IDF banned journalists. I'm also aware of plenty of videos of Hamas-aged men dressed in black running through the desert with gunfire in the distance (one of Tim's evidence videos of the massacre of innocents), and numerous videos at the aid sites. Are you saying there are no videos from the aid sites? They just somehow are never turned on when the massacres are happening. I gave you the two scenarios, you chose the one that fits your model. The one where people get injured and the Hamas Information Minister says what you want to hear. We're not talking about a single rogue soldier shooting some innocents. We're talking about a systemic application of brutal, cold-blooded murder of innocents. If it did indeed happen, you can believe it was the soldiers, I'll believe it was Hamas who did not want Gazans to get aid outside of them, and has shown a propensity of raping and murdering women and children.

Sigh... the Palestinian reporter for far-left NPR reports that the Hamas Information Minister reported at least 94 people brutally murdered by IDF! The UN report uses the same source (95) and then says cumulatively it's thousands! But then as you read the info from the UN Human Rights Office in Palestine (OHCHR, I'm sure an objective organization): So hey, sure, Hamas might have been around with some Uzis, but they were, umm, just directing traffic. It was all Israeli soldiers who indiscriminately shot the innocents. The article also tosses in people who died of starvation in the death counts, although it is unclear. Tim and I have already litigated this, but I'll say what I said to him: so much killing of innocents, so many shootings, and yet not a single video or photo of it. Apparently nobody in all of Palestine, including the author of the NPR pap piece (Anas Baba), have a phone with a camera or internet connection. It's a conundrum wrapped in an enigma. Tim is too far down his path of Jewish hatred to see, but maybe you can: what is more likely: (1) large swaths of Jewish soldiers, who joined the IDF to defend their homeland, indiscriminately brutally murder innocents in cold blood. Or, (2) the Hamas Information Minister is a lying sack of shiot, and an eager Leftist media regime is all too eager to lap up whatever pablum they are fed.

I agree with others that you did a great job picking leftovers. Regarding your performance, I'd bet that the majority of voters are those of us who drafted, and every character on your team was passed over 28 times by each of us. For a few of yours listed here: I thought about Thanos, but IMO he ended up being more of a wildcard IMO. Norman Bates seems kinda chalky, vs. "I think this guy is really villainous." I've never actually seen Psycho, I wonder if others here have. Picks like Freddy were interesting. I almost pulled the trigger on Michael Myers (who I'd have picked over Freddy FWIW) but nobody seemed to be going the slasher horror route. Similar with MCU in general -- Thanos, Stark, nobody was going that route. I'm not saying you were wrong to do so, because those areas clearly offered the most fertile fields. But, I dunno, they didn't seem to fit the vibe of the draft.

If I lose by 0.05 pts like in the Geek FF playoffs, I may kill somebody.