jerryskids

Oh good, Rusty came back from the bar for an inciteful comment about the debate.

I think an undiscussed topic is that Vance is, to some extent, auditioning to be POTUS should something happen to Trump, natural or otherwise. He clearly passed this test.

No you didn't.

IMO nobody buys blaming Trump for a once in a century pandemic from China.

I thought Vance would take the "Trump killed the immigration bill" head on. Disappointed he didn't. There is a good response to it.

Vance isn't taking the bait. Moderator: Why does Trump suck on his border policy? So objective.

Climate change, oy vey!

Round 1 to Vance

Walz stumbling on his words, we'll see how it goes.

I do say that. I was only responding to the question.

I think we'll never know. I've never argued on this site that he won, only that the system was a cluster fock. But hey, I appreciate your trying to pile on.

Some might say your incessant calling me dumb and a focking idiot are indications of your own lack of confidence in your intelligence. It's OK Jeff, the country needs ditch diggers too.

What can I say, I don't react well to Slingblades calling me a focking idiot. Room for improvement I guess.

Not necessarily. But it wasn't secure. I don't expect you to understand the difference.

Drunk already? Enjoy the debate.

I'm extremely confident about my intelligence. You aren't.

Throwing the gun already?

It was absolutely not secure. Ballots were shotgunned. Are you special?

Looks like we have a full-on Sanctuary attack, sorta You told me to "shut the fock up you idiot." Feel free to establish how you are smarter than me.

You know this how?

Truth hurts worms?

Minnesota, not Wisconsin. On my dumbest day, with the flu and Covid, I'm smarter than you've ever been. Walz is not an all-American guy -- he's a beta male who puts on a camo hat to put tampons in boys bathrooms and stand in front of Alex Soros looking deferential like a sex slave. Vance wore eyeliner for a costume. I'd ask you to be better, but I don't have much confidence.

I've discussed this in the past. I am something of a complex systems expert. If the system doesn't have the ability to find errors, it won't find errors. I'm confident you'll miss my point and say something like "so you have no proof." In other words, if you shotgun out millions of ballots with no way of verifying things, you can't find evidence of cheating. HTH

There isn't a single thing on Walz's resume that is true. Other than that, he's the aw shucks assistant football coach socialist beta male.

thegeneral doesn't understand the difference. He thinks that shotgunning out ballots to anyone who ever registered to vote, is the same as a vetted absentee ballot process. This was the same logic used in 2020. Most secure election ever!