jerryskids

Here, I'll simplify the logic for you. Some people are racist and/or misogynistic, and think all blacks/women/both are stupid. Others think Kamala isn't a rocket surgeon based on her book of business to this date. But if you think Kamala isn't smart, that doesn't mean you are racist. It is the same incorrect use of the symmetric property of mathematics that pseud Lefties apply to think, say, all Trump fans are racists and misogynists. That being said, even if some people think the first part, I would expect few if any memes, because even if they were made, they'd quickly get shot down. Instead I'd expect memes about her being a man, and her being there because she is Saint Barack's wife. HTH

Yeah, she'd have been a stone cold lock. I wonder if it went down like you said. My guess is that it's simpler -- she simply turned it down. She is living the dream: rich, revered going on worshiped, and able to opine about things without the phenomenal effort of being POTUS.

True, but the point is, there wouldn't be anything about her intelligence. Pulling the "raciss!" card when you accuse Kamala of not being smart, is a gun throw.

That first tweet is from a parody account

I'm confident that if Michelle Obama were running, we wouldn't have a meme about her having a 78 IQ

Laughable. You are at least as prejudiced as I, most would say more. Also, like I said, I did this for a living. You manage your father's properties. I would defer to you in the best way to get illegal aliens to clean out a parking lot. At the debate, she did well spouting non-responsive word salad and in baiting Trump to be Trump, which I'm confident was pre-planned. Like I said, she may be smart, but anyone with observation skills can see that she is not quick on her feet. Last time I said something similar about observation skills: Biden being brain dead. You probably still don't see it, which basically makes your skills extremely poor. But for grins, feel free to provide links of objective people saying she's extremely bright.

I used to be for the death penalty, but now I oppose it. Cases like this are part of the reason, although Rolling Stone is so Leftie, it's hard to tell how accurate it is. But in the general sense, I don't think the government should be in the business of killing it's citizens, especially in the larger sense that I believe the government is generally incompetent at most things.

Agreed. I'd have gone with 96. Just below average. Much more believable That being said, it's hard to tell how intelligent someone is. I'm confident, though, in saying that her mental acuity, or processing speed, is quite low. She clearly can't think well on her feet. That's not inherently a bad thing, depending on the job. For POTUS, it is a bad thing. Some of you might recall that I used to measure this for a living, so I'm somewhat qualified to make this observation.

Sweet Jeebus my team shat the bed. Who knew I should have started Odunze, Michael Wilson, Lazard, and/or Kalil Shakir over Conner, Achane, Aiyuk Also LaPorta can lick my dirty taint. I guess it bodes well for my bench and options, but it's shaping up to be quite a management challenge. I like when clear starters emerge and I can just plug them in.

The Left: Three pages of denigrating Melania Trump. The Right: Kamala slept with Willie Brown to get her career started. The Left: Misogynist!

I don't think so. Here is how a list experiment works: https://www.gradientmetrics.com/resource-old/list-experiments Pretty interesting; I wasn't familiar with these. I can see how it works. It sounds to me like they asked different questions through this technique, including wishing if he was hit. Here is what I think happened: - 30% of Democrats wish he was hit. - Other questions were asked to identify political affiliation, like "white republicans are racist," which are attributable to hard-left opinions [my guess here]. - Math ensues, and he comes up with his number of hard-lefties who wanted him hit. -

Figures. I was at the Cards/Lions game and only tracking my players online, not the other games.

You calling me a shell of my former self is great irony. You used to be one of the best; now you respond with "wow" and yet another Eeyore gun throw.

It's not misogyny, it's recognizing that there is a difference in the way men and women think. Girlios like you two hate the indisputable science on this topic. How much estrogen do you guys have, anyway?

Exhibit A. You are like a woman who says, why do men do [insert manly behavior]? It's so stupid$#@! Maybe you should go vacuum or something, boyo. Get in touch with your inner woman.

That's fascinating. It could explain why conservatives see the threats from our lying MSM, censorship, etc., while liberals don't see them, and say "muh conspiracy!"

Kaiser Soze

Snake Pliskin

He's killing my team in the Geek Balls league. Jeebus, he can't crack 10 pts PPR? Is there even another WR playing for SF?

This site shows an excellent graph of which states "lose" votes and which "gain" based on representation in Congress vs. population: https://usafacts.org/visualizations/electoral-college-states-representation/ Because every state gets 2 for Senators, the smallest states all get 3 EC votes vs. just 1. But Cali still gets 55 (albeit instead of 65). So yes, your vote counts "less," but not too much less. Also, looking at that chart, it seems to me fairly distributed between Red and Blue as to which states lose votes vs. which gain. If you read that otherwise, let me know. Finally, I'm not sure why you would pick AZ as your example. You'll note from the graph that AZ is on the losing (larger) side as well. Plus it is one of the fastest growing states, in large part because people from your shiot hole keep moving here in droves, bringing the same liberal policies that are destroying Cali. Thanks for nothing.

California and South Dakota have the same number of EC votes?

Well, that's sorta a Kamala word salad. Are you voting for her? My spiritual journey is personal, and is not ultimately one of choice, but of revelation. The election is one of choice, and happening in less than 50 days. Who is your choice, if you are a man?

Weepaws spamming this thread. Who are you voting for? Be a man, make a tough choice.

You obviously did a google search and just posted links you didn't read, boyo. None of them are polls. One of them is a collection of opinions. I never said Trump aced it, or even did well. Back in the thread about the debate, I was clear that I didn't think he did well. I explained why Trump said nice things about the last debate, and why his team is more concerned about debating a live person with CNN. You did not respond to that.