jerryskids

She doesn't have to, but using "he" helps make her point. Tell me if you see this or not.

No it's not. Her entire argument is that the competitor is a man. To call him "she" is to validate him as a woman. So she should say, "it's unfair for her to compete with women"? Dumb You are wrong on this, just stop.

Her objective is to emphasize that he is a he. Again, why would she not do this?

Her entire point is about biological men competing in women's sports. Why would she NOT call them "he"? Does it help her cause to obfuscate their biology?

If my car is surrounded, I'm sure as shiot slamming the gas. I'll happily face a jury of my peers... alive.

Not surprisingly, you've managed to confirm everything in my post, and you have no idea you did it. Congrats on your win, Tim.

If I said something to offend you, I apologize and certainly didn't mean it. I was just explaining my thought process. Also, looks like I may be adding Cantplay to my DND list. Mr. 9 for 9 cuts is +4 after 11.

I said that the riots weren't started from them going after the pickers, they started going after businesses accused of federal crimes. Wrong again, Gutter. Also, we don't know the backdrop of this. Could be Homan or Trump being vindictive against Newsom, wouldn't surprise me. Could be part of some larger activity, we don't know.

Another day, another morning waking up to Tim calling me out looking for his big internet win on something. BTW, you forgot to say I'd call you a yip yip dog, which you clearly are here. Again. I went back and read your link, and I decided I didn't know the back story or history to make a determination, so I didn't comment. All I did was ask what she said, because there seemed to be some question based on the posts of others. Here's a pro tip, Tim. If your takeaway from this situation is that Riley Gaines is the bad guy in this whole boys in girls sports topic, and not that Biles is a raging kvnt about it, you aren't center-right. I don't expect you to get it, because you never seem to.

Thanks. My responses/reasonings: in general, given the killer setup of the course, I put a lot of premium on past US Open success and overall tour experience, as well as total driving. Fleetwood: 7 of 9 made cuts, best finish 2nd. Consistent, good to great in all summary stats. Straka is not good around the green (133rd) and has MC in a few majors this year, plus 2 of 4 made cuts in this tourney, best finish T-28. But I do really like him this week; I just didn't know you liked him. Lowry probably would have been my second pick and I know you like him, so I maybe should have taken him first (not knowing you'd take Fleetwood). 8 of 12 cuts, 2016 success. But only 103 in putting. Cantplay: I haven't been burned like you, and he is 9 of 9 made cuts with a top-15 in I think the past 4 or 5 in a row. Game is made for this tourney. Weakness is around the green (89th) The other 4 I didn't analyze as much, but Hovland helped me win the PGA two years ago and he's been kinda hot recently. Bobby Mac was best value IMO, and Day is 8 of 12 made cuts with two T-2s. I also like Fumble's team. If I don't win, I hope he does. Or anyone but you.

No wonder you were mad I took Henley. Now I really wish I took Straka ahead of you as well.

So far so good.

I've never said that, child. Otherwise, this post is still pathetic and non-responsive. Which is to say, typical. I'll take the W, sit back, and watch you make a fool of yourself some more.

Why, because I refuse to see that this is all part of Trump's master plan to take over LA and then California$#@!? Like Hagar and his friends tried to take over America on J6? Face it, you mainline whatever the MSDNC spoon feeds you straight into your veins. If not, I'm still waiting to hear from Rusty or you, since you agreed with him, what I "whiffed" on.

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” George Orwell, 1984

I recall hearing about a study which showed your point that these kinds of protests actually turn the public against their cause. They also talked about the geniuses who try to destroy invaluable art to save the climate or whatever omnicause du jour. Joe and Jane Normie aren't blaming Trump for trying to uphold law and order, particularly when the violent protests are against authorities trying to enforce valid laws.

1/2 of my EdEx team goes off before 5AM my time, and the other half after 10AM. Looks like I have a sold 9+ hours of watching golf and not getting a damn thing done for the next two days.

Didn't read your own article, or understand what I said. Your article tells her own story of obstructing justice, and the raid never said ICE targeted an office building for its high concentration of farm workers. But if they encounter illegal aliens in the course of carrying out warrants for customs violations, tax evasion, etc., so be it. HTH And what is the point, No-win Ryan? That this is all part of Trump's plan to take over LA and then all of California$#!

More LOL, as if on cue. That isn't why ICE raided that downtown facility that started all this.

LOL misinformation. Like the misinformation from the MSM about the purpose of the ICE raid in LA that gaslit the mob to start this entire thing?

As I posted yesterday, adding to your point: the MSM gaslit them on the government's "actions." ICE didn't raid that place in LA to get a bunch of "California men" who pick fruit. They were serving out a warrant on a company accused of customs fraud, tax evasion, and other crimes. I'm pretty confident nobody in that mostly peaceful crowd knows this. Not even the college kid.

So true. All of these college kids who've faced fairly little adversity, and certainly have no life wisdom. They desperately want to feel significant, like they know something. "Yes biotch, I'm in college!"

This is a great quote. Did you make it up yourself?