jerryskids

She is not extremely good at interviews, no matter how many times you say it. Random word salads are not extremely good responses. Won?

It moved. I especially appreciated how the top girl kept the pressure on after the bottom landed.

I realize I'm pooping on some sports in this thread but... just watched the BMX racing, and every heat is a "boat race." Whoever gets in front out of the gate wins. The track seems too narrow at the speeds they are going to allow passing. Maybe it works at lower levels, but at this level, meh. Men's judo heavyweight final was good, worth a watch if you find it.

you are || close, you coont$#@!

This is what I thought when I first started reading the article. There does not to be any revolutionary technology in this patent. Measure speed, take a photo, send data. No rocket surgery here. They are just putting a stake in the ground for if this type of thing is ever implemented, so they can claim invention. Tech companies do this all the time. Bad publicity on this one, though. As this thread shows, most people will presume that they are imminently implementing this.

Squissy is on an ignore bender! He put me on it yesterday, which at the risk of tooting my own horn, means he doesn't want to read any posts right of Mao. Pretty soon he'll be down to just him and Real Tim, his perfect echo chamber. If he doesn't break his index finger first, banging the ignore button.

Most pundits. On Vox? MSNBC? Why was this amalgamation of Reagan/JFK/Obama kept out of the public eye all day? You didn't address that part.

Just getting around to this thread. If she had improved incredibly, the WH would have had her out front and center doing a bunch of speeches, since they desperately wanted to gaslight the American people regarding the cognitive decline of Biden. And yet, there she was, playing solitaire all day in her office. Also, by "Reagan," I hope you mean Alzheimer's Reagan. If you mean prime Reagan, I know we can't have a serious conversation on this. Then again, you still don't see the decline in Biden, so you've established your ability to evaluate people. I see short term enthusiasm for anybody but the half-dead guy. And to their credit, the MSDNC machine has done a good job in deciding to go all in on her, memory-hole her past, and instruct their lemmings that they are all enthused about a candidate who generates absolutely zero organic enthusiasm. We'll see if the machine can sustain it until the election.

What are those reasons? Two weeks ago she was historically unpopular -- your side was willing to roll out a half-dead guy instead.

Coconut tree!

I said we don't have the info to decide. What are her chromosomes?

No link. But weird! Very weird$#@!

Oh, I agree there is enthusiasm! You've been told to enthuse! Enthuse, Tim! Tell me, what makes you enthusiastic about her today vs. two weeks ago?

Yep, you read it and are parroting it, carry on, troll.

Well, I said several time about you trolling, but you didn't acknowledge that, instead acting like you were having some organic epiphany about weirdness. Post better.

Thanks. I don't definitively know enough to call her a man or woman. I am fine with her competing if she met the criteria, but given that she is an extreme case, I think the governing bodies should address this after the event. I've said this all.

Thanks for throwing the gun.

I've already said we don't have enough info to decide. Why don't you answer the post you responded to, to tell me if you agree or disagree? The post above is pretty much non-responsive to my post.

Yes, I've stated this. Why do you keep saying it to me? There are a very few number of people who have these issues. Are you suggesting we legislate to the extremes? The reasonable/obvious approach is to legislate to the binary which is true in 99%+ of situations, and deal with these rare exceptions as one-off situations. Tell me if you agree or disagree.

I the hell got that idea from your implying otherwise. You read (but not on CNN or MSNBC allegedly) that the Dems were calling Trump weird, and wasted a bunch of our exchanges to get to this point. So you are parroting what you've read on Leftist media. It's not triggering, it's funny how easily you fall in line, comrade. Harris is not weird apparently, amirite, centrist? Carry on.

You are in this mode once again. What is your point?

Cool. You implied that you organically started calling them weird, and now are admitting that you are following the MSDNC directive. Just not CNN or MSNBC broadcasts. Important distinction, good to know.

I said Trump. Harris believes in equity vs. equality, strongly opposes energy independence (shrouded in fossil fuel opposition), and most importantly, will be an utter failure in foreign policy and the border. Which are two of the main jobs of the executive branch.

Interesting. It's odd that you've used "weird" a bunch in the past day or so, yet you haven't heard anything from the MSDNC sending out the "weird" bat signal. Must just be a coincidence, great minds thinking alike and all.

Are we still pretending that there is a ton of enthusiasm for Harris? A few weeks ago the Dems were willing to gaslight us and elect Weekend at Bernies guy instead of flanking to Harris. Yet now, there is unprecedented unbridled enthusiasm. Enthusiasm enthusiasm, enthusiasm!!!!