jerryskids

Wow, you are an idiot. I'm heading to dinner, congrats, you won. You are tied to BeachGuy, the biggest idiot on this board. I used to think you were intelligent. No longer. You are a troll, nothing more. Have a great night!

Umm, no, I posted a bunch of posts that you quoted. How about after all that work, you ask BeachGuy to provide a single link to anything that he supports? Too much to ask for a center-right guy to provide? If so, stay out and let BeachGuy provide shiot responses.

I've repeatedly posted links. You, dummy?

I don't deflect, and fock you for implying I do. Here is one, regarding his assertion that support of Hamas is just a few college kids. https://www.pewresearch.org/2024/03/21/views-of-the-israel-hamas-war/

We can have that discussion, but my main point now is that BeachGuy is a blithering idiot, completely incapable of having an intelligent discussion. Yet he'd have us believe that he is a VP of a billion dollar corporation. I'm looking for someone to prove me wrong, but so far I've got nothing. I respect you and think you are intelligent, so please let me know what I'm missing.

Respond to my Pew Research post, then I'll curb stomp you on this.

I very much appreciate your honesty and openness on this.

No I didn't, dummy. You are a blithering idiot. Answer my post. But you won't

The facts that BeachGuy has provided to substantiate him "mopping the floor with MAGATurds today!"

The "new rule," which isn't new, is some link to substantiate your feelz. You've provided zero. Got any? No? Here is mine, showing Biden's motivation: https://www.pewresearch.org/2024/03/21/views-of-the-israel-hamas-war/ Your party has 1/3 support for Hamas, and a much higher percent of younger people, who are Leftists like you. Not exactly the "only fringe college protests" you blindly espouse. I don't know why I waste my time, other than to curb stomp you, because your response will have no data whatsoever.

Post one fact, just one, about anything you support vs me. You claim "data boyo which opinions are not," yet you've posted zero point zero data. I'm seriously amazed that any company would fast track you to an almost CFO position who fundamentally doesn't understand what facts are.

You haven't posted a substantiated fact yet. Link? Anything? You are a blithering idiot until you do so.

Great post, thanks for the contribution.

This is what I quoted: You both responded to this. If @thegeneral denies this then I'm done, and will just conclude that he is a troll on this subject, because he clearly did so.

What does this mean? I suggest you let Tim die on/defend his own hill of the two week summer.

That's it for now. But I'm not sure you understand what you just agreed to, given that you consider "acceptance" of trans people a moral absolute. You agreed to a biological male who considers himself a female, NOT being in female safe spaces, if they still have boy parts. Go back and re-read if you'd like to change your position.

Fine, so we can agree and move on?

Again, no data. @Fnord has posted that this has occurred at his company, where he is a HR manager. If, as you assert, it is the equivalent of being struck by lightning... what is the objection to making a national policy?

Wow, thanks for posting this new info! Wait, it's already been discussed for several pages. Did you even bother to read them? Never mind...

With whom exactly, center right guy? He hasn't posted a substantiated fact yet.

Non responsive. I'll say again: you think your feelz are facts, yet they aren't, unless you substantiate them. You put nobody in their place. Sorry, I can't take you seriously.

I'm not saying they are women. I'm saying that, by having their male junk removed, they've shown a seriousness about their conviction. See my response to HT above for more.

Again, how do you legislate this? You are talking about a person with no boy junk who looks like she might be a guy. Do you disallow any women with extra testosterone from women's bathrooms?

And I'm being honest and real with you. You honestly and really never support your assertions with data. And then you double down by accusing people who provide data of feelz, while maintaining that your feelz are facts. If you want to have adult discussions, you should change this pattern.

Show us a single post you've made in this thread that you've supported with data. This should end this conversation quickly. Yet I suspect it won't.