jerryskids

I didn't call them al qaeda. I said you would have to be an idiot to think they aren't organized. You then proved your idiocy by providing a link which defended my point, and as a bonus called them a violent terrorist group. BTW, using a far left website (wikipedia) to defend a far left terrorist group might be an example of a non-conservative thing you've done.

That's not the topic Rusty. Focus.

Pick an issue for what?

You've been calling me a MAGAturd non-stop recently.

Benatar although close, Madonna and Spears by a lot. I'm talking then, haven't looked at recent pics.

You truly have no idea how dumb you look in this. If you did, you would just slink away and come back to troll another day. Although, my fist does hurt from you hitting it with your face so much.

Accidentally created? That's stupid talk. Either it was created on purpose or not. Perhaps you mean intentionally released? Also your politifact report is two years old, we've learned a lot since then. And they are a hack Leftist shill.

Interesting, thanks.

So, loosely organized. Which in English means organized. They were organized enough to get 50 people together to riot in Philthy: They count among "fascists" mainstream republicans. Also organized enough to get 200 people at a Rose Parade to threaten any Trump supporters with violence. Hmm, trying to silence voices through violence. Who are the fascists again? In summary, they are a violent, POS terrorist group. BTW, these quotes are all from your own link. I mention it because, for the 912734289th time, you posted a link without reading it. Or at least thinking that I won't read it. Have I not shown that I will read your links yet? You seem incapable of learning. In summary, your own link shows that Antifa is a violent terrorist group. Now get your shinebox.

Also, no other event will have crazy scoring like this, so the penalty wouldn't be that bad.

Put my $100 towards the next two events, pwease.

We disagreed politically but generally we got along. I wouldn't mind having that version back, before he went off the deep end.

I thought Newbie was back! Also I like Manilow songs.

Me and my MAGA ilk. You are such a childish troll. Also, anyone who thinks Antifa isn't organized is a total Leftie sycophant, Leftie.

I think Lager has it. :kicksrock:

It's hard to say because the verb is omitted. If it is an implied preposition (like, "Here are pictures of..."), then "me" is correct. But if it is a "to be" tense, like "Here are...", then it is "I". https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/eb/qa/It-Is-I-or-It-Is-Me-Subject-and-Object-Pronouns-after-Copular-Verbs#:~:text=When the verb is "to,Peter%2C Tom%2C and me.

I think I'm up 3 at the moment, but things can change fast here.

He was a rock star in the Baltimore school system!

Required but not sufficient. I don't expect you to understand the difference. But for grins: you need such a degree AND a deep academic record. She lacks the latter. Seriously, you look dumber with every post, please stop, I'm getting uncomfortable reading your posts.

PhD from Harvard is barely table stakes to even look at the resume. By itself it is significantly insufficient for that position. But you are a pseud who thinks he knows how stuff works at elite universities. Just like your "trusting the science," which really means trusting the scientists and what the government tells you is science, since you clearly don't know much about science. Also you obviously don't know her family background. You are just looking dumber with every line. Then you end with an answer to my question: if you think Claudine Gay was a DEI hire, you must think all non-white hires are DEI. You clearly lack the mental ability to differentiate those events. Boyo.

Well, now you are getting into the proper definition of "inappropriate." I have actually never read that book, but based on my understanding of it, I would disagree with its banning. What exactly did SCOTUS say regarding the right to show inappropriate books to children? Because that is relevant. The right to write books that bother people is irrelevant.

If that is the extent of her resume, then for the job of president of Harvard University, that is a DEI hire. Her academic record is incredibly sparse. Also, your post omitted the fact that her family in Haiti was uber rich. This is what the Left considers diversity: admit and/or hire uber rich POC. As a bonus, giving a "best dissertation" award to a paper riddled with plagiarism is also a DEI award.

If what you listed is your beliefs, then you have some non-normal lefty tendencies. But I don't believe your list based on your posts here. And you called me "boyo" in an earlier post. Do you use that as a term of endearment?

No stupid. The "wacky left leftist" is the new normal left. They are setting the wordspeak and the policies. They aren't some fringe group.

Also you didn't answer my question: if you think Claudine Gay was a DEI hire, does that mean you think all non-white hires are DEI hires?