jerryskids

Yes, I've stated this. Why do you keep saying it to me? There are a very few number of people who have these issues. Are you suggesting we legislate to the extremes? The reasonable/obvious approach is to legislate to the binary which is true in 99%+ of situations, and deal with these rare exceptions as one-off situations. Tell me if you agree or disagree.

I the hell got that idea from your implying otherwise. You read (but not on CNN or MSNBC allegedly) that the Dems were calling Trump weird, and wasted a bunch of our exchanges to get to this point. So you are parroting what you've read on Leftist media. It's not triggering, it's funny how easily you fall in line, comrade. Harris is not weird apparently, amirite, centrist? Carry on.

You are in this mode once again. What is your point?

Cool. You implied that you organically started calling them weird, and now are admitting that you are following the MSDNC directive. Just not CNN or MSNBC broadcasts. Important distinction, good to know.

I said Trump. Harris believes in equity vs. equality, strongly opposes energy independence (shrouded in fossil fuel opposition), and most importantly, will be an utter failure in foreign policy and the border. Which are two of the main jobs of the executive branch.

Interesting. It's odd that you've used "weird" a bunch in the past day or so, yet you haven't heard anything from the MSDNC sending out the "weird" bat signal. Must just be a coincidence, great minds thinking alike and all.

Are we still pretending that there is a ton of enthusiasm for Harris? A few weeks ago the Dems were willing to gaslight us and elect Weekend at Bernies guy instead of flanking to Harris. Yet now, there is unprecedented unbridled enthusiasm. Enthusiasm enthusiasm, enthusiasm!!!!

Tell me more about monitoring pregnant women. I'm not aware of his position on voting power and children, but it is an interesting one. A culture without children has no future. Opening the border to let in a swarm of people from other cultures isn't the solution, despite what you say. (I don't think you ever responded to my "well thought out" post about immigration, btw).

I don't view it as semantics; as I've said, a lot of stuff has to work in conjunction for a woman to get pregnant. Whatever, that's not important to this discussion, so I shouldn't have jumped into the mud with you on this. I've otherwise said my peace on this. I already said I'm fine with her competing if she met the requirements, so you are arguing with yourself. Carry on.

I'm arguing that CNN and MSNBC, out of nowhere, started using "weird" to describe mostly Vance at the same time, to the tune of 100+ times per day (or so I've heard, but people have posted compilation videos). You are being a good lemming, and effective troll to boot. Trump's "weirdness" is baked into the cake at this point. To suddenly start calling him weird is, as I said, an attempt on the Left to pull an Aikido redirection on the fact that Harris is, in fact, really weird. And as comrade @nobodypointed out, a good stroke of strategy by the Left and MSDNC.

I'm pretty sure I've never stated that having a vag is the sole determiner of being male/female. I'm also pretty sure I've never stated that it is an absolute binary, as there are clearly a very small number of people like this boxer. You do your best to set up the rules for fairness, and If she passes the tests to qualify, then she should be able to compete. And after the fact, perhaps the governing bodies analyze their rules to see if there is room for improvement. To that end, if she does have an XY, what if any benefits would that provide? I'm not an expert, but I wonder if that also impacts things like larger heart, better lung capacity, better lever strength, and other known physiological benefits of men.

I understand that they are playing by the rules. I'm questioning the rules. Also, I still haven't figured out which throws result in points and which result in instant win (Ippon?).

I'm enjoying your trolling by using "weird" in every post. It's an interesting attempt of aikido by the Left and the MSDNC. Because Kamala "Coconut Tree" Harris is weird. And the Dems are the party of weird people. But somehow, a guy who rose out of hillbilly West Virginia to become a Marine and a Yale law graduate is weird. Simps on the Left just nod along with whatever the MSDNC tells them to believe.

I'd use a puffy labia shaped one against this Egyptian guy. Might prove distracting.

But I think you could try.

What in my comments makes you believe the first sentence? As you go on to say, we really don't know a lot about this situation. If she has an XY, and/or testosterone levels above those which are allowed (even if he/she naturally generates them), she should be disqualified. It's unclear what tests they performed. You had stated that she had a vagina so could get pregnant. I asked if you knew how it works, because it is a lot more complicated than that. It requires working ovaries, fallopian tubes, uterus, and the proper hormones to regulate it all. So merely having a vagina is insufficient. I'm pretty sure you know all this.

Watching a Swedish table tennis guy who uses an octagonal shaped paddle. He claims it provides a larger sweet spot. If I heard the announcers correctly, there are no rules on size or shape of the paddle, which is interesting if I heard it correctly.

I think that whenever I watch it. What they call "resting," I would call "drowning."

It is more Hitler-esque than anything Trump has done.

I think @TimHauckhad responded to me to tell me if he knew how women got pregnant.

Well, Israel could always have ended the war quickly, but your side would probably not like the result. It is essentially pulling the band aid off quickly, and killing some of the 80% of "innocents" who would vote for Hamas to continue to stay in charge. Perhaps you have a different interpretation of "get it done quickly"?

Did she educate Bibi that a 2-state solution is the answer, and that that is what Hamas has always wanted, and if he would just agree to it they could all poop rainbows together?

So, your opinion of a leader on the world stage is that she should act like Veruca Salt from Willie Wonka and show Israel that they don't have our support?

No, because the MSM is feverishly memory-holing her uber-progressive Senate voting record and platform when she ran for POTUS in 2020. Also, it's a full-court press on enthusiasm. We're enthused, everyone is enthused, you've always been enthused by Kamala! Enthusiasm, catch it! More recently, her skipping the Netanyahu speech to Congress was chicken shiot and showed she doesn't have the chops to be a leader. We are talking about a major ally fighting an existential, evil, terrorist threat, and she just quit. Nobody in the MSM will even consider pressing her about it though. Because, enthusiasm$#@!

Obama was an 18-month senator whose claim to fame was the most "present" votes in the Senate. Just saying.