jerryskids

Occam would say that they are there, ubiquitous, in all of those situations, because they are a net positive to the societies they represent. Your interpretation, for all of those constituents, is inane.

My simple question came first: anything to support your conclusion? I provided my thoughts: That's a tangible fact. Respond to this before I entertain your "subject to whiteness" amorphous tripe.

Was it already in the title? If so, then oops.

I appreciate your optimism.

OK, you are a child incapable of serious discussion. Carry on.

Every day. I haven't seen the Trump quote, but great whataboutism. Biden: 90132878459271 gaffes showing his age. Trump: About 90132878459261 fewer. Gutter: They are the same! Seriously, you position yourself as an adult in the room, nobody with any observation skills can equate the two for mental decline.

Didn't see this posted: Biden's latest gaffe-filled interview, this one with Time. Article by Newsweek: https://www.newsweek.com/joe-bidens-gaffe-filled-interview-raises-eyebrows-1908401 Full transcript is worse. Lots of rambling word salad. https://time.com/6984968/joe-biden-transcript-2024-interview/

Wait until he finds out that the author of the study, Roland G. Fryer, is an economist... ... and black.

Again I'll ask for data supporting police being an "overtly white supremacist system." I'll start. Here is data showing it isn't nearly as racist as you think. Study from Harvard: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/fryer/files/empirical_analysis_tables_figures.pdf

Yeah... I'm trying to be polite, but it's tough on this one. Like I said, the ubiquitous existence of police forces in jurisdictions of all shapes, sizes, political leanings, education, wealth, culture, would be my support of police being a net positive. But I'm mildly intrigued if he has anything tangible to defend his position.

Do you have data to support this conclusion? Because it seems to fly in the reality that virtually every jurisdiction has police.

I understand the words. It's the comical way you combined them.

Adam Hadwin at -7, nobody drafted him. We're smartz.

@edjr, you might want to put an "NSFW language" note on that.

That would mean he spent all our money on hookers and blow.

Got it on PeeCock now.

We used to have one close to us, it's quite good. I'd say a step above fast food, $10-15 range. Just looked, there are a few still around within 5 miles, and lunch is coming up. That Mexican corn bowl with shrimp or seafood looks yummy...

I always return shopping carts, and generally consider those who don't to be neanderthals. That being said... I could see some situations where you might not do it. Phoenix summer, for instance -- inside of a car approaches boiling. You aren't going to put young kids in a car seat, then take a minute walking a cart to a corral while the skin burns off of your kids. You get in the car and crank the AC ASAP. Also a woman at night, sketchy area, I could see not wanting to do it. But, she's in SoCal and sounds like she is lying to herself with statistics to justify her sociopathy, so... fock her.

IKR? I'd have kept the anxiety on the down low. Opposing crowds are going to ride him mercilessly going forward.

Wut? Please explain.

The other day my wife was watching a video on her phone. Wife: OMG, Megyn Kelly looks turrble these days? Me: Really? Wife: Yeah, look [shows vid]. Isn't she really skinny? And those hair extensions? Me: I mean, oh yeah! Sure, she looks like she's had a little work done, but she's still good looking.

I learned in this thread that all cops are white supremacists. At least all the bad ones.

Appeals court halts Trump’s Georgia case during appeal of order allowing Willis to stay on case This one is definitely not going to trial before the election. https://apnews.com/article/trump-georgia-election-indictment-fani-willis-1c14171f33e7fb76bf3bdae6aba57d1d

That's actually pretty good.

I'm beginning to sense that you don't like police...