jerryskids

Adding "January 6th" for Biden to the drinking game. May God have mercy on our souls.

No problem. Wife and I were in Venice last October, absolutely spectacular. I've never been to San Antonio/Riverwalk but my wife has, so I I can't personally compare. Enjoy your trip and report when you can.

I thought the point was to have a true debate without histrionics. Thanks for stating otherwise.

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts, and a general report on Amsterdam. Also, CNN just showed Trump getting off a plane and asked "why isn't Melania there?" Objective.

Awesome! We didn't go to the left at Scouts Lookout because we had the OK to go on Angel's Landing. It's a once in a lifetime experience; don't die, enjoy, and report back

Of course not, don't be dumb. I'm OK with a catch-all "-est" word. "Tremendous" seems a bit too much -- it needs to be an "ultimate" word. I like adding "c'mon man" for Biden.

My proposal for a drinking game. I'm open to change/amend this, just throwing out an idea. Also, I'm thinking of taking sips, not shots. Take a sip/shot when: Biden says: anyway, democracy, felon, lgbtq Trump says: biggest/best, crooked, Hunter Thoughts?

From the neutral, objective network that is "exclusively" showing the debate to the country including undecided independents? Really? Are they also discussing how Biden has no brain cells left? Wait, I'm watching...

I agree with your premise that the concept of DEI has value, and that removing names from interview screens is a good, objective step in that direction. I disagree with the exponential additions of DEI-related positions to support graduates with DEI-related jobs. I think the NFL has a good idea to require interviews, but that is a very self-contained fish bowl. And it doesn't translate to the general application to all American businesses. We need to figure out a system to optimize the advancement of superior minority people into positions, without putting clearly insufficient people into those positions.

I promise to try, after tonight. I have a few things more to say to him. Otherwise, I only promise to try.

Got CNN on. Van Jones and company are talking about how Trump is going to destroy democracy. Objective presentation for the American people. Democracy!

Why do you keep saying 50 patents?

So, what's your response to how it started in this thread? We had a discussion about aborting at 9 months, you jumped in ignorant as always, I called you out, you couldn't admit being wrong and alluded to some super secret thing in your response that was so awesome. So what is it, boyo? What made your response so great in the context of our discussion? I look forward to your irrelevant response.

So he started it, good. Fair enough, I confess to having a soft spot regarding responses to a pseud who posts irrelevant pablum and thinks that makes him intellectually superior. I may have a few posts tonight that respond to that, but I will try to just ignore him or say "gun thrown" in the future.

It's BeachGuy, you'll admit it if you are honest.

One of us is an immature little child who keeps preening his feathers, then throws the gun because he has nothing salient to add to the topic. You are a black hole of intelligent discussion. Now respond with how I post too much, or how spreadsheets are more important than top line growth.

I already showed you otherwise, corporate finance VP who sucks at math, English, and getting along with people.

Again, irrelevant pablum that has nothing to do with my post. Stay dumb, boyo.

You might want to Google what throwing the gun means. Or not. Stay ignorant, my friend.

Why do you feel the need to jump in when you have nothing remotely relevant to say? You look dumber with every post, if that's possible.

Cutting off 30 minutes, adding two breaks, no audience of constituents, and a lackey host/network are all part an honest debate?

I called opinions from experts data, not facts. Supporting your second point. We've discussed this ten times. And you still don't get how you look stupid jumping into this thread. Then you threw the gun. Never go full ratard, BeachGuy.

Growing up, Styx, Yes, and to a lesser extent Rush were three of my favorite band. Styx was my favorite -- I wore the shiot out of my Grand Illusion, Pieces of Eight, and Paradise Theater cassettes. These days, I listen to more Tool than anything, so that's my current answer.

Falcons under 9.5. 9.5 for the Falcons? Also I'm a homer but I'll be betting the Cards over 6.5. They were on a .500 pace last year after Kyler returned midseason, and he had basically no offseason of work with the team. I disagree with @patweisers44 and think Seattle takes a step back with the new coach and system, and no real QB that I can think of (Geno?).

Also this belongs in the "jokes you can't tell anymore" thread.