jerryskids

Congrats, I knew you could find a way to bring your hatred for Israel into this. From the Brookings Institute earlier this year: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-we-learned-from-the-peoples-march-about-attitudes-toward-political-violence/ Granted, the people who participate in such a march are on the more extreme side. But there is a growing belief among young people especially that violence is an acceptable response for what they perceive as hate speech.

I'm not sure I can compete with the combined borg stupidity in this thread. We've got Gutter acting indignant about the most likely scenario with the letter, not to mention the collective hive mentality of THE LETTER IS ALL THE MOST IMPORTANTEST$#@!, no good answer about why Biden, Harris, or whoever was running the country didn't leak anything about the bad orange man, Saints added to the list of people who engage with me without reading what I say, and now we have Sean equating signing a birthday card to autopenning executive orders. I'm out for now anyway, you all keep up the MSDNC's good work. Git him for that card!

Well, Daily Wire had three AI tools analyze it, which is three more actual sources than you've ever provided defending Hamas. But yeah, you are right, Trump probably wrote that third-person play-like thing with "enigma" and all. Saying "but Biden" is still an irrefutable defense of Trump not being implicated directly. Another moderate post from you. Seriously, you might be the least self-aware person on the interwebs.

I wasn't. But I addressed that earlier today; go back and read about how you are chasing the MSDNC butterfly.

How does this not lead to the ruination of lives?

What now?

Instead of wasting my time with a question, why don't you tell me what should be done here and why?

No, as I said earlier today, the US government is perfectly able to leak info about Trump (were he implicated) and not leaking the rest of it. If you are talking about why they didn't just release the whole thing, then yes, same as Trump. I don't recall you being moderately concerned about it during the Biden* years though.

That doesn't stop people's lives being ruined.

Not maybe, yes. Don't be a chicken shiot, man up to your unbiased moderate ways and resolve the Team Biden dilemma. In fact I think you were the weak sauce guy I mentioned, although I don't recall for sure. The rational answer for not releasing "the rest" is that any names would instantly have their lives ruined without the data being vetted or them having their day in court (which is why grand jury testimony is by default sealed). Add to that, a lot of those names are likely hella powerful and influential. I'd ask you to take an L here, but you'll just refuse to, and probably bump your Strike thread for the 3rd time today. Because you are much better at trying to dish out L's than you are accepting your own. HTH

Who stole Newsom's account?

Looks like overall it's a wash. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/06/26/demographic-profiles-of-trump-and-harris-voters-in-2024/ Your explanation seems like a good one.

I'm a few years younger than the Boomer line, but I spend a lot of time with them in my retired educational activities. As a group they are mostly Left -- let's just say that I never bring up my politics in discussions. I've wondered why that is. Certainly the hippies/Vietnam protestors come from that cohort, but it must be more than that.

People need to vent.

I just learned from you that I support pedo ring coverups.

Dang, you are en fuego today. Any chance you'll let me in on the Powerball numbers?

Good point. A much more rational position, in the face of the arguments I've presented, is to have concluded already that since you know Trump is a pedo, he's guilty of all the butterflies that the MSDNC is flitting at you, so your rebuttal is that I just believe whatever my Dear Leader says and support his covering up a child sex ring.

Also... nailed it.

And Harris. And whoever was running the country. And the DNC. Not everyone in the White House was a vegetable. I think your TDS has broken your brain. Meanwhile, enjoy chasing the butterfly!

I recall asking this before. Somebody tried a weak sauce answer like "they didn't want to release all the names because of too many powerful people," as if the US government lacks the ability to leak some info and keep other info back. There really is only one rational answer. The Party of Science doesn't like it though, hence the reason the letter is all that matters. The usual suspects do seem to love getting gaslit about it.

The only question is to what extent he read it. I'm sure he knew enough about his buddy to know an outline of a naked woman wouldn't be out of place. To what extent he read, absorbed, parsed, edited the text, I can't say. Donald is definitely a detail guy though, so I'm sure he went over every word with a fine-toothed comb. I had to google to make sure DEFCON 1 is the highest level. Because you seem at DEFCON 0. I haven't read all this thread: I presume you've provided an intelligent reason why Biden and Harris had the Epstein files for four years, including a contentious election, and never leaked all the bad stuff about Trump therein?

Did I say he read it? Also, looks like a woman's outline to me: I know you are at DEFCON 1 TDS and beyond rational discussion, but can't you find something more important to complain about Trump. Tariffs? Being mean to illegal aliens? Letting Israel kill terrorists?

Please stop wasting my time and read my posts about Trump's signature.

I don't know for sure, I'm guessing he signed it. To deny it is a very Trump thing to do though, like with Stormy. Something, maybe his narcissism, makes him a chronic denier.

It got into the book because his admin sent it to Ghislane or whoever. The last sentence is hilarious. 20-year-ago Trump wrote in a completely different style to throw off future AI tools when he would become president. That's some 987-D chess right there.