jerryskids

True. Biden had docs he had no authority to have! Oh wait, you meant something else... Venn diagram.

Awesome! I'll skip the long story, but we ended up zipping through the area I think you are describing with the globe time line (the evolution of people?) to get to the gems/minerals at the end. I definitely want to spend time there on my next visit, along with the space section. Glad you like the 6Columbus req, if you stay there, let me know how it works out. Definitely on the , let me know. Fair warning: August and September are very hot here. End of October through... heck, today it is a dry 90, are much better weather times to visit. But I'll likely be here if you come, except for a week mid-August when we are doing a fam cruise in Alaska.

How does Merchan know that sending him to the pokey for contempt wouldn't work? Regardless, I'd need to hear from actual legal experts who were there and saw the behavior from all sides, not Katie the Leftist X stenographer and opinion reporter, if sighs and a mumble of "Jesus" would typically get a witness's entire testimony removed.

Look at how he keeps trying, it's pathetic. He thinks he has some big gotcha because I provided the statements of political experts to support Biden being influenced by protests. Yet earlier today he stated that Biden is only supporting men having babies to appease a few voters. I was tempted to ask for PROOF$#@! that Biden doesn't believe it, but then I thought nah, that doesn't help discussion and would be as stupid as BeachBlade. He is a woefully insecure pseud who desperately wants to think of himself as being aligned with the actual smart people, as evidenced by... well, most of his posts both to me and in general, disparaging the people who support Trump. He should seek help.

Oh, well, sighing and a mumbled "Jesus". You don't threaten to throw out his testimony. Not if you are impartial.

I mentioned the patents because you said I couldn't/shouldn't design anything. You posted this out of nowhere, and I'm the insecure one? Seek help, insecure girlio.

Not to conflict with Mike's recs/setup, but we were just there a few weeks ago visiting our daughter. Stayed at a hotel called 6 Columbus, right at Columbus Circle. https://www.google.com/maps/place/6+Columbus+-+Central+Park+Hotel/@40.7675742,-73.9857551,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m9!3m8!1s0x89c25858808111a3:0xd6bc0a96cf7a0521!5m2!4m1!1i2!8m2!3d40.7675702!4d-73.9831802!16s%2Fg%2F1wzt38ms?entry=ttu Reasonably priced for NY. Their sushi restaurant is considered the best in the immediate area, according to my informal pole of a few locals who were in there (it was good). Next door on one side is a 4.9 rated bagel place with a line out the door every day but worth it; we ate there twice. On the other side is a Starbucks. Across the street is a shopping structure and, of course, Central Park. Columbus Circle subway stop is a large one, right across the street, with multiple trains (1, A, C were ones we all used). Also, we did the Natural History Museum. Awesome stuff. We were disappointed that the costume section was closed (it was right before the Met Gala, and my daughter is in the fashion industry, it's open now I believe). But we focused on the ocean, dinosaurs, and gems/minerals, all great. I love geology stuff, so the gems/minerals was particularly cool for me. Have fun!

RMFF You are a sad, sad little accountant. Seek help.

There is a definite pattern here. 1. Merchan gets his panties in a wad over something, anything, the defense does. 2. Merchan then shows what I'll laughingly call "great restraint" at, say, not throwing out critical defense testimony because of an eye roll. 3. Leftist media tell you about the incredibly soft treatment Trump is getting. 4. Lefties post.

I replied to him with "I don't know...", hoping somebody would respond with a specific response relevant to the reference.

Are you thinking of a hypothetical candidate who, say, allegedly pays of a porn star to keep her yap shut?

The "tiny segment" is not the handful of women who think they are men while giving birth, but rather all of the people who support this concept. Which is a lot more people. Enough people that it's worth alienating the people who believe women should be celebrated for motherhood. ETA: But this is the Covid thread so I'll stop sidetracking after this.

Are the CDC and the Biden admin "absurd extremes" who think men can have babies? Source: AI overview from this Google search: https://www.google.com/search?q=CDC+uses+birthing+person&oq=CDC+uses+birthing+person&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigATIHCAMQIRigAdIBCDQ4MzBqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#vhid=zephyr:0&vssid=atritem-https://www.newsweek.com/biden-admin-replaces-mothers-birthing-people-maternal-health-guidance-1598343

I'm shocked. Also, that seems like a person who could shine some light on this pesky "election interference" crime that the prosecution never addressed.

I don't know...

Hey Tim, what is the Democrat proposal for this? 3. Federal regulations in order to combat systemic racism by police in this country.

I just looked it up and it looks like he and his team did review the report and corrected a few small errors, so I agree that is highly unlikely. I'll keep my money on Biden coming off really poorly.

My money is on him looking even worse than many people thought. But you bring up a good point about Garland's role in this. Seems to me it's worth corroborating the transcript. Regardless, it is an attempted abuse of Executive Privilege.

One example is that some colleges require professors applying for positions to provide "DEI Statements" as part of their application. Basically, the professors have to weave a story of how they've helped intersectional people in their careers, or else no job. Thankfully, MIT recently stopped this inane practice. https://www.thefire.org/news/mit-stops-using-dei-statements-faculty-hiring#:~:text=The university will no longer,their foot in the door. I am a member of the MIT Free Speech Alliance that helped make this happen. :humblebrag:

His 7 yr old will grow up in a DEI world where he will face discrimination for being a white male. I don't think he was specifically talking about 2nd grade recess.

I meant the witness disaster part. Lost all credibility? Like more than a convicted perjurer or a porn star? Also, perhaps some in the jury drew a different conclusion. Perhaps sitting there all day every day, some are thinking "man, this judge sure seems one-sided." Who knows?

He is saying: why should my 7 yr old son be held accountable for the past dominance of white males?

How did you conclude this?

Da fuq?

Should work now, cleared out some stuff.