jerryskids

The one with the floating green? We stayed at that resort, but didn't golf. A good friend of ours had a vacation place up there, and threw herself a 40th birthday party at the resort. This would have been around 2006-07, because I was close to 40 as well. After the party, I flew from Spokane through Seattle to Penang, Malaysia to visit my customer. I've wondered if I'm the only person to ever do that itinerary.

I've been to Spokane, en route to Coeur d'Alene. Beautiful country. Oddly, I've never been to the Seattle metro area (other than the SeaTac airport, but I don't count that).

Nice cameltoe.

Do they have a 4D experience where I get to lob molotov cocktails into a federal building, and then an AI-generated Kamala Harris bails me out?

What's the next tourney, Memorial? Whatever, I'll take Scheffler if he isn't in a jail cell next to Trump.

It's the other way around: a technicality is being used to call it a felony: basically, calling Trump's behavior "election interference". Which, I don't believe Trump has not been charged with, so I'm not sure how that works. Regardless, it is a creative (to be kind) interpretation of election interference. And by "creative," I mean "what crime can we manufacture to keep the OMB from running for POTUS"? I'm amazed by how many people here are OK with this, and think NY would have done the same with, say, Biden.

Careful Ed, @IGotWormswill be here soon to call you a Replacement Conspiracy Theory Raciss for even posting this video.

Although he is one of my alts, wheeee! I also passed on Noren earlier in the draft, because I'm smartz.

Could you imagine being @Ron_Artest, gleefully taking the role of Sherman to the pseud Mr. Peabody that is BeachGuy?

That's a fair position to take, but that isn't the topic of the OP.

Great post. I think a lot of the arguments here are over the differences between stolen and interference.

RMFF

So if I understand: Thomas should recuse himself because of his wife, but the NY judge shouldn't have recused himself because of his daughter?

Surrender accepted. Typnig away.

Bump for @BeachGuy23

Scrabble Trivial Pursuit Cards Against Humanity

You seriously can't read something you wrote yourself and see the problem with it? VP of what again?

Looks like you are struggling with a simple question. Here, I'll repeat it for you. As you pointed out: I said "19th century French Literature degree." That is shorthand for "some degree that doesn't afford the person the ability to get a job to pay off the loan." You said I was arguing the extremes. I responded that it was not the extremes, that people with less useful degrees are the majority of people who can't pay of their loans. You typed... this, and think it's a big win for some reason. So, if I am arguing the extremes, please educate me on your opinion of the typical persona of a person who can't pay off their loans. Heart surgeon? CFO? Patent Lawyer?

Read it.

I'm not exactly sure what this word salad is saying, but taking a stab at it: feel free to ask him for a link if you want one. I was interested so I looked it up myself. It looks like there is data on both sides. HTH

Extremes? Is your assertion that a person with a STEM degree is typical for people who can't pay off student loans?

I'm well aware that people with college degrees make more money. But those aren't the ones who need loan relief. I doubt that many engineering/STEM grads need their loans paid off. Because those are useful skills. Finance degree, maybe, because that just involves making a debit and credit column add up the same. Cog work.

It's hilarious that, on the heels of a 7 page thread with mostly good, nuanced discussion, you read the OP and give a 3rd grade summary, then accuse me of missing the big picture. Class is in session, and you missed it. If you want to go back and read the thread (which I'm confident you haven't), or re-read the OP, and you want to ask something new and interesting that hasn't been discussed, feel free. But sorry, I have no response to "an issue with transgenderism poses a threat to our survival". Read the thread. Or don't, as I don't think you'll learn anything anyway.

Nothing wrong with prepared statements, but they aren't debates. You could just read a website for policy positions.