jerryskids

I see @The Real timschochet didn't respond. He never does when it comes to requests for expectations from Hamas. He has none. It's easier for him to believe the Hamas Information Minister that 14000 children will die! Hamas is starving the children. Say it, Tim. While we're discussing Leftist simps, I noticed this: Yeah, that's what's happening. Did Hamas or UNRWA tell you that? They know you are tards who will believe the numbers they throw out there, and will believe that aid sent into the country will actually get to any kids actually starving. Perhaps you have an answer Gutter, to what Israel should do against an opponent whose charter is the elimination of all Jews not only in Israel but the planet, who sets up bases under schools and hospitals and mosques, and who, along with their people, have never ever supported a two-state solution (that solution being a figment of Leftist imagination)?

Well gee Mike, your post was non responsive on the topic at hand, since you seem concerned with the topic and all. Let's start there.

Awesome! What's the prognosis, and next steps?

I'm not counting on anything, I was merely pointing out that there may be a valid legal attack on Harvard. And they haven't been laughed out of courts; ACB recused herself on the Christian charter school case which, had she not, would have likely been a win for conservatives. Can you think of a single case where the Leftist syncophant justices would have recused themselves to prevent a conflict of interest, errr... stopping a progressive attack on the legal status quo?

Looks like Team Trump maybe found a legal way to stick a dagger into Harvard.

Trump Admin Revokes Harvard’s Ability to Enroll International Students The DHS secretary posted the announcement on X. https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/trump-admin-revokes-harvards-ability-to-enroll-international-students-5862017?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2025-05-22-4&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2025-05-22-4&utm_medium=email&est=4JGh7l41ykerJzjEdQ5apfS%2FS8fRSOLSt7nZcdG8%2B3d4VfnfwlkCrb0jvnxgRMmu Dang, this escalated! From X:

That's fine, I'm not saying any one person is omniscient on this or any topic. In fact, that's kinda RFK's point.

Thank you for this. I know you've followed the science on this more than anyone here, so I appreciate your honesty. And then there is Gutter, who apparently thinks Covid is the same as the flu, and that the underlying technologies of the vaxxes are the same for the two.

1. That presumes that your model is accurate that the FDA was a perfectly science-driven, politics-agnostic organization. Does Big Pharma lobby the FDA at all? Also, "pulling" doesn't need to be 100%. It could mean removing recommendations and/or restricting for populations for which the benefits are not clearly obvious. 2. MSDNC refers to the cadre of leftist MSM organizations, not a specific person, so there is no dehumanization. 3, 4. The vaccine has been deemed not sufficiently proven safe and effective for certain populations. On this last point, I am a little concerned with long-term ramifications. Maybe I'll add my concerns to my old thread that was just bumped.

1. Thanks. So if for another vaccine, it was subsequently found to have a significant impact on heart health, would the FDA historically continue to allow them to young healthy people who absolutely do not need them? 2. I see you've entered Rusty territory with your dehumanizing "Brain Rot". What's your pet name for Biden who had dementia and cancer for years and wouldn't know his autopen if it was used for a physical prostate check? 3. We'll see. 4. Being a general supporter of vaccines doesn't mean I support allowing virtue signaling moms to give their young boys an unnecessary vaccine known to cause heart issues.

Thanks. You used to work in this industry, or adjacent at least: do you think that the FDA should require a comparable rigor for Covid as for other vaccines, particularly for younger people without comorbidities, given known issues like myocarditis? I say this as a person who has argued here in the past that vaccines are perhaps the greatest invention in the history of mankind, so I'm not anti-vax.

Is it a conspiracy theory that young people, particularly men, have a risk of cardiac issues from the vaccine?

@TheNewGirlaalready showed you are wrong. I'll add that if we got a bad strain, that would be new and the current booster would be ineffective.

Back on topic, it sure is fortunate that they found this cancer the week that the Hur tapes were released and Tapper's book comes out.

That's your point; "by making" vs. "to make"? Squistion would be proud. "to make" is in the context of discussions like the one we are having. Why in the world would I say that you influence the media? Man, you are having a bad day.

You still can't read. Try again. I know you are sad because it's been a few hours since your masters gaslit you.

bro doesn't read well.

To be clear, my comment about gaslighting is more about the inner circle you mentioned, and the attitude of the MSM since the release. We don't know who exactly knew what. That being said, presuming that most of the media didn't know about it, you would think that this might be the point where they finally gain some professional self respect and tell their leftist party masters to fock off.

Agreed, absolutely none. What's the topic of this thread again? Oh yeah, Trump conflating the Gleason scale with cancer stages. You are a stage 9 maroon.

I have no idea what fat, 6'3" men weigh, I'll leave that to you. What I do know is that the media is encouraging lemmings like Gutter/Ron_Artest to make Trump lying about his weight the lead, not the fact that we've been gaslit about Biden's physical health. Pro tip: Trump is narcissistic and likely to underestimate his weight. Also, I got the 10% because upthread the big argument was that Trump must weigh at least 250!

Of course! You are a good little leftist lemming; they've given you the lead and you are running with it! The lead is CERTAINLY not that Biden has a cancer that takes years to manifest. It's that Trump conflated a scale which is known only to people who've dealt with prostate cancer. Man, I laugh so hard at you whenever you accuse me being a good little MAGA. *WHAM* Thank you MSM, may I have another!

OMG Trump might weigh 10% more than he reported, it's the same as Biden%$#@

He's referring to the Gleason score for prostate cancer: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/22087-gleason-score That gaslight is burning bright for you. You've got your marching orders, bang that drum!

It's like you are addicted to being gaslit by the media.

I dunno, I could argue the opposite. People who aspire to be POTUS are wired differently. Joe spent his entire life in politics working towards it. People like that care about their legacy. The MSDNC will gaslight folks about it and make sure he looks the hero. Jill probably did a lot to make that happen.