jerryskids

I passed on Zal because I didn't want an all-injury team, plus like you said, he hasn't played well. I felt like getting Clark at the 1/2 turn was good value, but he fell because of recent performance. Niemann is the highest ranked LIV player, but is he really that much (if at all) better than guys like Homa or Fleetwood picked later in the second?

Thanks. I don't necessarily disagree, as I am fairly libertarian in my thinking. The challenge is, for this model to work, there needs to be an underlying acceptance of what is "harm." And a general selflessness or deference to the needs of others, which I believe we lack in our current hedonistic society (and might be part of a future installment of "cultural existential threats." ) For instance, to me, a biological man competing in women's sports is clearly doing harm to the other women. As is such a person being in a woman's locker room, spa, prison, even bathroom, if one is to err on the side of consideration for others. I've used before the example of my daughter with Type 1 diabetes. She is free to pursue whatever she wants... with restrictions. She can't join the military, for instance. Becoming a pilot or commercial truck driver is extremely difficult. This is how I view trans people.

Yeah, but I look at my team and think meh... at the end turn, there was never one time where I was "ooh, awesome, he's still available." I was looking at piles of players who were all comparable.

Allman Brothers

Good topic. I'll start with Chicago: Terry Kath (my favorite), Peter Cetera, and Robert Lamm. Also the Beatles

Wow, you are spun up on this. That word is used here all the time. Your Leftist buddy Gutter used it Saturday. Feel free to go call him out, center right guy. But you won't. The diabetes thing made sense in the context of why you are so butt hurt by a word. It's 9 pm here, 11 pm in Texas. I agree it's bed time for one of us.

I presume you are upset by the word because of your son. I would never use it in such a case. My daughter has type 1 diabetes, but most people conflate that with type 2, which is more behavior driven. I don't take it personally. I would suggest you do the same with my reference to a poster like weepaws. You dehumanize the former POTUS and current nominee with every Clownzo post, and I think less of you with each one.

I don't know God's expectations. I do know that you are a pseud who dehumanizes not only Trump but all of his supporters Have a wonderful evening!

For the remainder of this discussion, I shall refer to Biden as Clownzo. Clownzo's daughter wrote in her diary that her dad molested her. There are numerous videos of Clownzo sniffing the hair of underage girls and pinching their nipples There is nothing "legally in play" because the right hasn't figured out how to call paying off a porn star "election interference". I see you ignored Clownzo's drug-addled son. That being said, you are correct that it was Jill who slept with Clownzo while married. Have a good night!

So what do you propose instead?

Says the guy who dehumanizes Trump with Clownzo at every opportunity? And I said borderline retard. I admit that this phrase has a special meaning with @kutuluwho resurfaced recently, which made me think of it.

And President Biden is a P.O.S. who sexually abused his daughter, cheated on his previous wife with Dr. Jill, and uses his drug-addled son to collect money for the Big Guy. Or at least used to, before dementia set in. Note I didn't dehumanize Biden with a silly name. Good night!

Who is "Clownzo"? Is he the former POTUS, and current Republican candidate for president, as represented by a pseud Leftie, former journalist turned insurance salesman, who knows better than the majority of the country?

What lies, I admitted to misrepresenting his position. People make mistakes. Jesus forgave such mistakes. You don't. HTH

What lies did I say about you, or Jesus? I know you won't answer because you are a borderline retard, but I figured I 'd ask in the interest of conversation.

I plan to vote for Trump given the current candidates. I see you continue to dehumanize him in a machiavellian way with your insistent use of Clownzo, congrats, you suck at being a Christian. Also, according to polls, you are in the vast minority of people right of center who will vote for a dementia-ridden guy increasing his support for Hamas terrorists. My bad, you made a point that she was a porn star, not a prostitute. Mea culpa.

Is this your center-right position of Republicans? Also, @GutterBoy posted recently that Stormy is NOT a porn star, FTW%$#@#!

I don't see it as a far divergence, but obviously I'm missing your point. I was trying to differentiate society's expectations from God's expectations. But I feel like I already said as much, so I'm just not seeing the difference.

Sorry, Lager https://sports.yahoo.com/rory-mcilroy-files-for-divorce-from-wife-erica-after-seven-years-of-marriage-165443365.html

Your model is fantasy, it has no basis in reality. It will absolutely never happen, at least in this election cycle. The path to minimizing abortions, in AZ anyway, is to allow the 15 week law (or similar) to stand, diffuse the constitutional amendment on the November ballot, and "boil the frog" over time to reduce the 15 weeks to... As a bonus, your position will rally a bunch of young, single women to come vote for that ballot initiative, and while doing so, vote for Biden to win AZ. Also, putting women in prison is not a good strategy. A better strategy is to push for a positive culture shift which celebrates birth, babies, integral families. We both want to minimize abortions. Your approach is an abject failure, mine works.

You have no positive results. In your model, AZ voters pass a constitutional amendment allowing abortion until birth.

How so? I'm being sarcastic; IMO Jesus would think you are a bumbling idiot for pushing a policy that leads to more baby murders.

It should absolutely be God free IMO; that is foundational to our culture. Worship how you wish, or not. But you cannot practice sharia law, nor can you have polygamy with minor girls like Colorado City, AZ. Regarding your second paragraph: I read somewhere recently, probably in research for this thread, that a society will eventually settle on a moral code, and in the absence of a religious one, it will be determined by the state (a Marxist philosophy). I prefer the teachings of Jesus as the basis, especially given recent support by this administration.

No, I endorse minimizing abortion. You, not so much.

Bless your heart. Do you understand the concept of letting the perfect be the enemy of the good? I'm guessing not. Congrats, your position results in more murders of unborn babies.