jerryskids

Our smoker needs the igniter replaced. I got the igniter delivered from RecTeq but I haven't done it. They show a 2 minute sped-up video to make it look easy peasy, but you basically need to take the entire thing apart to do it. I'm askeered a little.

If one of them doesn't WANT to stay home, I'd argue that that isn't a sign of great parenting.

I feel strongly that the case should never have been brought, but in the end that is a matter of opinion. To my knowledge the prosecution has yet to broach the subject of election interference; perhaps the plan is just mention in summary, "well hey, there was an election, so it interfered, yahtzee!" But I have no idea how it is going to turn out. Also, your sad attempt to add "hung jury" to your side of the bet made me think: what if he is found guilty of the misdemeanors only? I feel like I heard there is a scenario where this is an option. If so, I could see this being the plan all along. Tying the docs stuff to a bullshiot election interference charge allowed them to call it a felony and bring the case in the first place. But they never even try to make it stick, and let the jury be Solomon splitting the baby and find for the misdemeanors. In the end, Bragg and the judge can go to their woke get-togethers and be heroes for convicting the OMB. I had another idea, more tinfoil hat, where the judge calls a mistrial at the end because the prosecution never brought the felony part of the case, and they do the whole thing again. Here the idea is simply to keep OMB busy during the election.

So, was he charged with election interference or not?

I think it's interesting that this thread title, and much of the MSM, call this an "Election Interference" trial, yet he hasn't been charged with election interference in NY.

Yes, she says I insulted her. I do not recall it but have apologized as best as I can, given that I don't recall it. Is this what a "sketchy past" means?

You buying that BeachGuy pablum that I said it was an undeniable fact that college protests are affecting Biden's policies? (pro tip: I didn't.) And then when he asked for data to support it, I provided the opinions of political experts who agreed? That's DEFCON 1 level idiocy, even for you.

I'm waiting for @Sean Mooneyto come tell me it doesn't happen often and I hate trans people.

I believe that young children at drag events (shows, story hours) has a grooming effect. We can debate the extent to which that is the intention (although the intention is at minimum to normalize the behavior), but if you don't think all of the bright clothes, makeup, hair, lights, and bombastic behavior can have an impression on young children, you know zero about young children. And before someone goes down the red herring about whether or not you can turn a kid gay, not all drag queens are gay. For many it is a lifestyle in and of itself.

I had cabbage at dinner. At home. With corned beef. I recall saying this to you. I didn't insult your wife. I insulted you. You were a d1ck to TNG, own it and stop being a poosay.. I have no sketchy past with TNG, she will confirm this. Have a great night!

I'd lean into it. Also you are in LA; like Phoenix, there is basically no weather. Do some research on monsoons and haboobs, and go full frontal weather on his ass. You might need his help in the zombie apocalypse, after all.

Divorced only twice? My bad. Third time is hopefully a charm. And I didn't say I was going to a baseball game. I said I had been at one. I was admittedly confused as to why somebody would think "going to dinner" would mean leaving the house. I forgot who I was chatting with. Perhaps your latest wife doesn't cook? Too busy with cats? Still a nice comment to TNG, congrats, winning$#@!

You still think "going to dinner" means leaving your house? Thrice divorced guy would probably think that. Nice comment to TNG, you should be proud.

Nice, you sure showed her, center-right guy.

Bummer that Hamas is going to take anything of value that comes into Gaza, like they have for the past 20+ years. And then the western Left will blame Israel for denying aid. Rinse and repeat.

Also, I googled this since weepaws is allergic to links. As usual, it doesn't represent the situation.

No link? Hippy surfer cult leader from SoCal fondled young boys in his cult. I don't need a link.

Nobody told Fatsuyama that the rest of my team is tanking for the next tourney. If I miss out on Scheffler because of this, I'm going to personally go Tonya Harding on his back.

That's why I typed all those words about doing our best to thoroughly vet every entrant, including legal ones. But I'm certainly not going to get into a semantic war with you, so sure, a wide open border is the same as a tightly-regulated legal immigration system which thoroughly vets immigrants, and focuses on economic vs. family justifications. You win, stop it all.

I just looked; $65 at my TotalWine. Perhaps JD released a bunch recently. Regardless, it's good stuff.

I argue that this is the same faulty logic I talked about. We should do our best to vet all immigrants, taking a cue from Canada (yikes!) to focus on allowing people in based on economic/professional value, not the family relationships of second cousin, thrice removed that we currently operate under. Or more to your point: just because some terrorists got through the cracks 23 years ago doesn't mean we should have a wide-open border.

I'd be shocked if that's the same whiskey. It's probably single barrel, but not barrel proof. I buy stuff from TotalWine all the time, love them. Their app for pre-buying is the best, if you know what you want in advance.

What the hell does this mean? I'd ask for a link, but I know you are allergic to them.

I just looked this up because I heard about it: in some states (including AZ), you do NOT need a membership to by alcohol at Costco. https://www.cnet.com/culture/what-can-you-get-at-costco-without-a-membership/ Apparently you can buy prescriptions and eye exams (but not glasses) without a membership in every state.