jerryskids

Survive stage 4 cancer 3.5 years later, come back and tell me if there's a God.

That's OK, they are dark skinned and Leftists mistakenly think they are oppressed by white people. It's not terrorism, it needs to be looked at in the context of 100 years of colonialism.

This has nothing to do with what I said, but thanks I guess.

The Catholic Church is chartered with the souls of the entire planet, and billions are already under their watch. It is a challenging charter, trying to weigh the needs of all of the cultures of the world, to lead them to Jesus. Churches like @weepaws surfer dood, and American Southern Baptist, collect like-minded folks, and it is easy for them to be sycophants in their beliefs, and to throw shade on those they don't believe like they do. It's kinda funny that you say church isn't a business like up north. Because... they just magically print money from above?

Pudgy ugly guy says wut?

My thoughts are as follows: - When looking at revolutionary, outside of the box ideas, it would not surprise me that more of them come from a liberal mindset. These are the same people who tend to excel in arts. - To make these pie in the sky ideas reality, they need engineers, which come more from the conservative mindset. Because, reality words. - I have lived in this scientific community for a long time, and I understand their thinking. - By and large they have no basis in the real world. They think that everybody wants to be productive, nobody wants to skate on the government dime. If they just invent a better mousetrap, the world will be a better place. - Most importantly, they think that all of us are stupid. Including @BeachGuy23. They feel that it is their moral imperative to make the world a better place, and if you disagree with their solutions... well, that is your failing.

@BeachGuy23, your thoughts? Specifically the bolded. TIA

I would probably have gone Fatrick (I have a soft spot for PXG guys, if he's still playing them), then Conners, then Henley. Not sure what I'd have done in a Burns or Henley, Henley or Burns matchup.

Spoiler

I liked them too. Luckily I had identified three I liked: Russell Henley @Fumbleweed

Oof...

I can't think of a post which would have less self-awareness. Awesome job.

Raining cats and dogs is a terrible analogy. And before you trip over your own feet and bang your head from backpedaling so fast; what in your "hyperbole" was the purpose of "prove it?" Otherwise, good post, good effort. Lots of feelz.

Actually, the bigger point is that you made an asinine claim, and when confronted about it, instead of changing your position, you doubled down on your stupidity with "prove it!" So I did.

Give him a break, he is a liberal, he operates on feelz. 81% feelz like 90% feelz like EVERY, an undeniable fact.

I understand your point, but IMO all SCOTUS judges (heck, all appellate judges and maybe all judges) should lean conservative. The default should be to not shake things up too much, and only do so when existing laws clearly need a tweak. They should not be activists like Sotomayor who rubber stamp every progressive feeling du jour.

3.04 - Tony Finau @WhiteWonder

I hope you count beans better than this.

You are such a girl! An ugly one.

Looks like I hadn't so I just venmo'd you. Last year I won early and played with house money the whole year, so this concept of paying is new to me. Also it looks like several others haven't paid; why call me out? Is it because I called you ugly in the eclipse thread? :twak:

We're in the middle of our eclipse, whee! I poked some pinholes into a piece of paper, it makes little crescent circles, which I've seen before. Maybe 50-60% coverage I'd guess. It's also slightly darker for a sunny day, which is always weird during an eclipse.

@dain11279

This data is 15 years old but still interesting. While the majority of scientists are Democrat, as expected, it is far from 100%. So you are wrong of course, because your claim is idiotic on its face. QED. That's Latin, HTH https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2009/07/09/section-4-scientists-politics-and-religion/ I would argue that the public split has become more 50/50, which should bump up the scientific Republican percentage somewhat.