jerryskids

I appreciate the response. #2 has been addressed well by others. #5, I don't get it. A two state solution has been proposed, Palestinians have turned it down. Hamas doesn't want it because they don't want land, they want to kill Jews, and having a land dispute helps them to rile their masses to support their raping and burning Israeli women and children. #6, you aren't making another argument for moral relativism. There is no moral relativism here, there is pure evil in Hamas. The fact that your Muslim friends don't agree (and we see politicians like the Squad supporting Hamas) is why people are wary of Muslims. You can call it racism or whatever you want, but immigration in the US works only if the people assimilate to our overriding values. Your friends and people like them are anathema to our values. You can't just add such people and expect the country to continue working. I understand empathy, it is a large reason I had a successful sales career. Empathy means understanding, not agreement. I understand that people like your friends, and the Squad, have disgusting, amoral beliefs.

If you had read what I've been saying, your leftist media masters want you to believe in the false moral equivalency that you so eagerly accept. Part of doing this is playing up the "oh no the poor innocent Palestinians" while playing down the Israeli victims. Putting up these posters does a small part to help offset the support in the MSM for Hamas, and evil organization that rapes and burns women and children. The reason I keep saying that Hamas is evil and rapes and burns women and children is because they did, in fact, on purpose, go out and rape and burn women and children. And every time I see you, Tim, Worms, General, or others with the "both sides do bad things" idiocy, or the "Israel shouldn't escalate because maybe Hamas will go away if they don't" lunacy, or the "if they kill Hamas they'll just recruit more, so they shouldn't kill Hamas$#!" ratardedness, I'm going to remind you that Hamas, on purpose, raped and burned women and children.

You got your answer, which if you had read anything I had said you would already have had, and in typical Gutter fashion, you've thrown your favorite gun: "how many posters have you put up?"

They are videos of people tearing down posters of Israeli hostages. Do you think the bad part here is that such despicable behavior is broadcast to the people, and not the behavior itself?

So you support the dehumanization of the Israeli prisoners and victims. Not surprised.

That is a unicorn wish that is not an option, as I've said multiple times. You didn't answer my earlier question. Here, I'll repeat it: There is no moral equivalency between Israel and Hamas, and there is no "if Israel turns the other cheek Hamas will just go away." You either support the behavior of Hamas, or you support Israel killing some of the human shields while killing the evil, soulless Hamas creatures. I support Israel. Which do you support?

How has Israel behaved badly, and how have they contributed to the situation? Did they stop Egypt from taking in refugees? Did they not send in water pipes, so that Hamas could turn them into missiles? You are absolutely creating the kind of equivalency your masters at the MSDNC want you to have. "Both sides do bad things..." bullshiot.

Another week of watching the Cards be competitive, partially rooting for them to win, partially rooting for them to lose for a better draft pick. If they stick to script they'll be close or ahead going into the 4th, only to run out of steam.

If she gets to be a big enough problem, the MSDNC will find evidence of her being a racist sexual harasser back in high school. The Lefties here will not question it, instead breathing a sigh of relief that the media has once again saved them from difficult thoughts.

It is really that simple. It's not complicated to recognize that Hamas is evil and soulless, or that the majority of Palestinians defend their raping and burning of Israeli women and children. You make it complicated because cognitive dissonance makes it difficult for you to admit that you side with people who rape and burn women and children on purpose, then hide behind their own women and children, then prevent said human shields from leaving. Hamas places no value on the Palestinian people, other than as human shields. There is no moral equivalency between Israel and Hamas, and there is no "if Israel turns the other cheek Hamas will just go away." You either support the behavior of Hamas, or you support Israel killing some of the human shields while killing the evil, soulless Hamas creatures. I support Israel. Which do you support?

In other news... water is wet.

For #1, it is yes. The absence of data makes your initial statement incorrect. For #2, instead of severity, I should have stated time -- Ivermectin is thought to be effective early in the infection. Somebody who has had Covid for 7 days (as allowed in your study) is past the time when Ivermectin could help, regardless of severity. That being said, I find it odd that a 20% improvement in time to resolution of symptoms (from 12 to 10 days) is not viewed as statistically significant. This implies to me that their sample size is to far to draw any significance one way or the other, which they somewhat imply in their "meaning": "Do not support the use" is different than concluding it is ineffective.

True dat! Also, I googled "best songs about autumn" and the first one on the list was When September Ends. Also on the list, duh:

I originally was going to post California Dreamin' And yeah, it's really about him losing his father to throat cancer, but since that's what I have/had, it's a little close to home for me.

As I said up thread, it is to dehumanize the victims. You can't support a soulless, evil group like Hamas if you internalize the human atrocities they perform with a smile.

By "especially," do you mean "only"? And by "have ," do you mean "have a severe case of"?

Link? I haven't been around as much but I would be open to seeing an example.

I feel like it would be hipster to not like Scorcese because they seem somewhat formulaic, but it's a damn good formula. Plus he gets great actors into great roles (DeNiro in his prime multiple times, same with DiCaprio, Daniel Day-Lewis).

This thread has nothing to do with politics. You make this place worse with every post.

Already did multiple times in the past, but you are an inane troll. Carry on.

I've refuted it in the past, but you lack the intelligence to digest it. Instead you had the Spinal Tap reaction I predicted. I'm not wasting the time of finding and posting the data again, it's lost on you anyway.

Why are you proud? What end of this clown show is a win? Who is the uber awesome speaker that makes it worthwhile for Republicans to look like incompetent buffoons to independents?

I agree with you here, a private-only model doesn't work for sparsely populated areas.

Well, if there was any doubt that you are Wade Garrett and all his simpleton other aliases, it is gone with this post. Only they (and now you) are so stupid to continue this debt idiocy when I have repeatedly shown how Trump had his final year (CoVID emergency) of increased spending/debt, whereas Biden continues and builds off of it despite the non-existence of such an emergency. You will probably respond, like you historically do, with a Spinal Tap "But this one goes to 11" statement about how Trump raised the debt, not capable of understanding what I'm saying.