jerryskids

Tim: we should have less poverty like Denmark! Me: [lists a bunch of specific reasons we can't be like Denmark.] Tim: those don't help me eat my cake, so I'll dismiss them.

I led with Hygge which you ignored and which is anathema to your desire to be a billionaire. I also listed low population, low diversity (and hence low immigration), and strict citizenship requirements including speaking the national language and proving financial independence. None of those apply to the US. You aren't a serious poster on this topic

I've often said here that if I had to give liberals one epitaph, it would be, "they wanted their cake and eat it too." I provided numerous reasons for you to discuss and/or rebut. Instead you just say it would be nice if we could be all things to all people. Carry on.

Occam's Razor tells me they discussed suiciding Kirk if he didn't support Israel betterer$#@!

The US isn't Denmark. Denmark is the home of "hygge," which loosely translates into "happy with good enough." True, there is little poverty. There is also little extreme wealth. The top 10% in Denmark makes $120K. Here it is $235K, almost twice as much. The top 1% in Denmark makes $300K Here it is $800K, almost three times as much. Denmark takes much more in taxes and provides much more social services. And of course, Denmark is not ethnically diverse. 85-87% of people there are Danish. Also a low population, just under 6M. This combination makes it much easier to provide services like health care. If this sounds like a better model to you or your socialist friends, you are welcome to move there and become a citizen. Be warned though, it's not easy.

So, both sides are the far right and... the far right? How moderate of you! You have a weird set of sources. You don't trust the governor of Utah, but you trust DropDeadBiased, +972Hamas, and now Candace Owens, a serial grifter. I guess as long as it supports your hatred of your people, you'll trust any hack source.

Thanks, I'll check that out.

Interesting take by Walter Kirn. Walter predicted that Luigi Mangione would get off for similar reasons, and a judge just dismissed the top two murder charges against him.

I know you hate context when defending violent Muslims over Jews, but he was talking about the violent Muslims that want to kill Jews. Seriously, why do you hate your own people so much? Were you abused by a rabbi as a child?

Stating the hard to argue fact that gays would get thrown off of a rooftop in Palestine is not nice? Or joking about how Israel has leveled a lot of the buildings used by Hamas to cover their terror tunnels is not nice?

So can ChatGPT:

The Freakonomics podcast is airing a series on ATC right now. One of the problems with their antiquated systems is that they differ from location to location, so you can't move an expert-level employee to a new location, he would need to start over. So it is more complex than an "ATC shortage." Also the Big Beautiful Bill has $12.5B allocated to upgrade the systems. You probably hadn't heard this, since it can be construed as a positive for Trump, so your Leftie sources wouldn't cover it. Aren't you the one who drank the koolaid that SCOTUS ruled that POTUS is immune for everything?

I just visited the memorial. Very nice, maybe 1-200 people there. Regarding the property, the buildings are in an industrial park. The memorial is between the curb and the fence to the buildings. The sidewalk is probably public land, unclear about the land between it and the fence -- in Phoenix, for a house anyway, that is owned and the responsibility of the landowner.

Courts have found bias against whites and Asians in elite university admissions.

Also, there is a Memorial at Cardinals stadium this Sunday. I'm going to be out of town so I'm not tempted to go, but I expect some violence if and when yahoos like this turd show up.

Disorderly, destruction of property? I'm sure they can come up with something. City of Phoenix has gotten bluer with all of the Californians scurrying in like rats, but I expect he'll get charged

To save his life?

I believe, and I suspect Kirk did, that the CRA had the effect of doing what I said. I also believe, and have said here many times, that the Left has the soft bigotry of low expectations when it comes to black people.

Why would you ask that? This sub-discussion started when Gutter copied and pasted a list of bad Kirk sayings from one of his Leftie sites, then challenged people to show how any of them were out of context. I did that, unless Gutter believes, despite what I said, that Kirk thinks the black folk should stay out of whitey schools.

Do you think he wanted to keep the negroes in the back of the bus, yes or no? Hate to go TimHauck on you here, but you are acting all indignant and haven't rebutted my position that the CRA comment was out of context. Which, by the way, I used words on. Way more than you are worth in this discussion, it would seem.

Copy/paste guy didn't watch the video I took the time to find, post, and summarize to his question.

I never questioned that he said it multiple times. In this one, he corrected the kid that he didn't say it should be overturned, he said it was a mistake. Kid says that's crazy. Charlie challenges him to try to figure it out. Kid is well spoken, well dressed, Charlie is pushing his mind to think. I don't know if any of your Leftist sites mention it, but Kirk thought the CRA created a DEI monster that was anti-Constitutional in its suppression of free speech and in creating an anti-white bureaucracy. Unless you think he meant that coloreds shouldn't go to the same school as whites, like Gutter seems to since he included it in his mindless cut and paste. In which case I'm done with the discussion. ETA: My first paragraph is a great example of why the Left hated him. He treated that kid like an intelligent young man who could grow to have complex liberal philosophical discussions. The Left doesn't want that for black kids. The Left wants them to hear happy things as they grow into the next generation of subservient voting block.

It's not the original; I just posted that there is no video of the original. We're dipping our toes into "you don't read my posts" territory again.

https://www.fox13now.com/news/crime/fbi-arrests-2-after-incendiary-device-left-under-fox-13-news-vehicle Remember, the culture is fine. We should assimilate them. And by assimilate, I mean let them practice a culture which is anathema to Western values. Also, based on the names and ages, maybe a father/son terrorist Muslim combo. Fathers teaching their culture of hate and murder to their sons. Quite touching.

The clear implication without context is that Charlie wants the coloreds to use different water fountains. There is no video from the reference you cut and pasted, but here is a shorter one where he repeats it. https://rumble.com/v4pvgc6-jeremy-carl-its-okay-to-be-white.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a It is an 11 minute interview with a guy who wrote a book about anti-white racism. I'd suggest listening to the whole thing because it is short, but he says the above quote just after the 8:00 mark. He adds, "the Civil Rights Act created a beast, and that beast has turned into an anti-white weapon." At the 9:25 mark, after saying that the liberal media won't cover this, he states "if you have unapologetic, ferocious anti-white racism, then young whites are going to find some very radical political positions, and I don't want that." Unfortunately, he is correct on this. Also, it's clear that he's OK sharing the bus with the negroes. You can put your head in the sand regarding anti-white racism if you want, that's your choice. But that quote without context is crap.