jerryskids

But as others have pointed out, multiple times: gender dysphoria is a mental illness which requires significant counseling, and those who have undergone or are undergoing medical alterations (hormones, surgery) require constant medications. Both of these disqualify the person from deployment in the battlefield. I've said before, my daughter with Type 1 diabetes cannot join either, because of the physical/medication issue (she requires constant insulin access). It's a practical limitation that has long existed for other such conditions.

So he lied to the court, either to stay with his family, or he was in MS-13 (or another rival gang to Barrio 18), or both. Bring him back, undo the stay, then... whatever. I've already said that I don't support shipping people to El Salvador prisons, but unfortunately, people have dug their heels in on both sides of this, so I don't see how it can be avoided. I'm moving on.

Ah, carefully worded I see. I'll do similarly. I concede that his testimony is that he left for a gang-that-isn't-a-rival-gang. But given the situation at the hearing, with his family's business gone and them moved to Guatemala, provides further evidence (that word again) that he may have been in a rival gang to Barrio 18 at the time. Because otherwise, there is no fear. Yahtzee.

US Supreme Court lets Trump's transgender military ban take effect Full article: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-lets-trumps-transgender-military-ban-take-effect-2025-05-06/

Fair enough on the first part. At the time of his hearing, the family business had shut down and they moved to Guatemala, but they were still threatened with what exactly if Garcia went back to El Salvador? They had no business and were in a different country. On your second part, I'm reminded again of the difference between evidence and proof. There is plenty of evidence. Whether it meets the burden of proof for a non-criminal proceeding is up for interpretation.

This is still my opinion, and unfortunately it came true. Also clearly, nobody has pimp slapped Trump on this.

So how or why would Barrio 18 make a 30 yr old husband and family man join their gang?

That wasn't my question, and you ignored the part about the family business and what has happened in that time but you long ago abandoned intelligent discourse. How's that last word coming?

Thanks. Wiki, as usual the arbiter of non-partisan truth, states the following: But the link to Newsweek, source #2 above from which most of this was derived, contains a key omission from above: So the source is his testimony. @TimHauck, you are the expert here: is he a credible witness in a court hearing about his own deportation? Also, this wasn't my question. What did the gang do to the family business after he left? Also, he was born in 1995 so he's 30 now; is the gang still extorting the family, and they will make a middle-aged man join their gang if he returns?

Then he left. What happened next?

1. I don't recall. If you prefer, we can call it "gang-that-isn't-a-rival-gang" for now. 2. Gee, no, I've never heard that. Your turn: 1. Walk me through this logic from your impeccable source, Garcia, since you are an expert on source impeccability: Gang-that-isn't-a-rival-gang threatens the family business, and Garcia's response is to flee the country. Your argument is that gang-that-isn't-a-rival-gang was just doing bizness, and it was nothing personal about him. Explain to me why his life would be in danger from gang-that-isn't-a-rival-gang if he went back to El Salvador.

Because there is no hypocrisy, as I've explained and pointed to. Unfortunately, I don't speak stupid, so I don't know how else to say it. Good strategy on your part to toss the gun, then make that last comment. Enjoy your Tuesday.

What's not odd is you misreading some posts and not reading others, but trying to get a gotcha anyway, then when proven wrong, trying to move the goalposts to some irrelevant red herring. I guess this is the closest you'll come to admitting the L, so I'll take it I guess.

I've always called him a wife beating, human trafficking gang banger. I've also said we should bring him back because of the existing stay. Those two things are not inconsistent. And I've said it in this very thread, along with other threads on this topic. I just explained to you how you are wrong about flipping my opinion. It's too early to be drinking, even for you. Trouble in your personal life? Are you a little touched? None of us is getting any younger after all.

The "whackjob activist judge" I referred to, was the one who bought the story in the past that he was in danger if he went back to El Salvador. In context, we were discussing Kilmar making up a story to avoid deportation back home. Also in the very post you quoted, I referenced his 4th and 5th paragraphs. Go back and read them, since you didn't the first time. Nice try trying to dig up months-old comments of mine as a gotcha, though.

Reading is fundamental, gutter.

I also agree with your 4th and 5th paragraphs, as I've stated multiple times. Your last paragraph is hilarious, Mr. Immaculate Sources. Who told you that, the multiple-time wife beating, human trafficking, hand-tattoo adjacent gang banger? So walk me through this smart guy: a gang, not a rival gang, just a gang different than the gang he allegedly is in, threatened his family business, and the solution to the problem is for him to flee the country? The only people idiotic enough to buy that are a whackjob activist judge, and a center-right poster who vets his sources.

Hey, it's all relative.

Man, I live in your head RMFF 24/7, don't I? When those autism pills kick in, how about you explain to us how the officer's other issues, from which he personally benefitted, means that he just randomly made up shiot about every gang banger on the street? I've already proposed that if he had shady stuff going on, it would make more sense for him to NOT draw attention to himself by doing so for no reason. Also, you seem to think you have some gotcha with the bond thing, but multiple people have explained to you that due process to deport an illegal alien gang banger is different than the criminal process. Smart people like @The Real timschochetare taking the position I have from the beginning, which is that the smart (and correct) play here is to say it doesn't matter if he's Hannibal Lecter, he had a legal order to not be deported to El Salvador. And yet, folks like yourself just can't help dying on the hill of calling a multiple-time wife beater, who fled El Sal because of (alleged) threats from a rival gang (and abandoned his mother to do so, allegedly), has suspicious tattoos, trafficked other illegals errrr... picked up 8 hitchhikers with no luggage, a "Maryland man" like the MSDNC pablum you gorge on daily. You do you, center-right guy.

MLCKAA in history class. NSFW language

She has my canon working just fine.

I'd like to try to get some blue milk out of those jugs!

I wonder, do you think the Jews have the right to the land currently called the West Bank, which correct historical name is Judea and Samaria. The "Ju" in Judea being where "Jew" comes from. Jews were there centuries if not millennia before Islam even existed.

The fact that a "Little Armenia" exists in the second largest city in the country is not surprising, and its name speaks nothing of a "perfectly fine reputation." I've noticed recently that you like to respond with red herrings like this. I thought of it yesterday in your long exchange with Voltaire; it was like you didn't read a word he said.

What does that have to do with Woodland Hills?